
I'd say the structure and convection are good enough for possible development still.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Steve wrote:>>KWT, Aric Dunn - much thanks to the both of you for your knowledge. Is it in your opinions that we can point to these anomalously low vertical instability profiles as a cornerstone in any explanation for the lack of activity, not only with ex-Gaston, but in the basins as a whole? And if this is the case, is it reasonable to state that until we see these instabilities increase, we cannot reasonably expect "typical" peak-season performance?
I don't think it is at all. I think each of the storms is a product of what's going on at the time. The biggest issue to date, and it's something Bastardi threw out there a few weeks ago that KWT and I had been talking about, is that the generally lower pressure in the NE US and Canada have been doing the work of redistribution of heat. In other words, there hasn't really been a need for the tropics to do the dirty work (at least up until Danielle and Earl came along). We're also in a somewhat strong and increasing La Nina season where there is a greater likelihood of a later season with plenty of weaker, western-biased storms and recurves. I think we total it up at the end of the year and see if things made sense. If not, then we wonder if it was low vertical instability, lack of temperature contrast between the sea surface and upper atmosphere (which was what Dr. Masters started hinting at in mid-August before the season took a turn) or if it was something else or many factors. But I think the initial slow start had to do with low pressure profiles in the northeast. There is no strong signal that that profile is going to change or flip for any length of time as both the ECMWF and GFS are +/- neutral-negative NAO for the forseeable future.
Frank2 wrote:Amazing that there have been approximately 1,500 posts on a system that has never been more than a weak TS - life's very short folks - don't waste valuable time on something that doesn't require this much discussion...
Frank
Vortex wrote:Should I dare say we have lift off....
hcane27 wrote:Frank2 wrote:Amazing that there have been approximately 1,500 posts on a system that has never been more than a weak TS - life's very short folks - don't waste valuable time on something that doesn't require this much discussion...
Frank
Just a curious question from a novice and rare poster ...... but why tell people not to waste valuable time on a topic you appear to be following and posting to regularly ??? Are you saying you are not wasting your time , or that your posts are more valuable then someone else's ??
If it stays south of Haiti/DR, and develops, you're probably getting a cat-4 in the west-carr. Remember how quickly Gustov intensified?canes04 wrote:All I hope for is it stays south of Haiti. I will go out on a limb and say it develops within 48 hours(barring land interaction).
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests