- What are the models saying about the system's speed once it's in lower central gulf? I've noticed that NHC's forecast moves it rather slowly once it reaches 96 hours.

Moderator: S2k Moderators
HURAKAN wrote:RL3AO wrote:Usually these big depressions take time strengthening since it takes time to consolidate everything.
But I have a hard time believing that a system in the WCAR with favorable atmospheric conditions will only go from 35 to 50 mph in 2 days. Lets see.
njweather wrote:Quick question:
- What are the models saying about the system's speed once it's in lower central gulf? I've noticed that NHC's forecast moves it rather slowly once it reaches 96 hours.
While I totally understand the concept of making a quasi-ensemble by using model means in a forecast where the envelope is fairly tight, I agree that it really loses its point in a situation like this. Just because you pick a camp doesn't mean you have to mirror it exactly . . . but at least pick your more probable solution and base it off that, rather than just slapping them all together and seeing what comes outAir Force Met wrote:AllI can say about this forecast is: I am holding my toungue for the sake of the young on the board. Many of you know my opinions about the NHC's "split the difference...consensus forecasts"...and this proves my point.
I guess I am just a pick a side type of guy.
HURAKAN wrote:Accuweather. They seems to think it will track farther south, but just in case, they leave the door open farther north!!!
Air Force Met wrote:Comanche wrote:
The discussion said it was a blend of the models, so I imagine now witha center, the models will pick sides, I lean towards the GFS and Euro personally.
"AFTER 72 HOURS THE TRACK MODEL GUIDANCE
DIVERGES...WITH ONE GROUP...INCLUDING THE HWRF AND GFDL...TAKING
THE SYSTEM ON A MORE NORTHERLY OR NORTHEASTERLY TRACK. A SECOND
GROUP OF GUIDANCE...INCLUDING THE GFS...ECMWF AND NOGAPS KEEPS THE
SYSTEM ON A MORE WESTERLY TRACK OVER THE SOUTHERN GULF OF MEXICO.
THE OFFICIAL FORECAST IS A BLEND OF THESE TWO."
AllI can say about this forecast is: I am holding my toungue for the sake of the young on the board. Many of you know my opinions about the NHC's "split the difference...consensus forecasts"...and this proves my point.
I guess I am just a pick a side type of guy.
ConvergenceZone wrote:HURAKAN
yea, that Accuweather Track seems more realistic.
HURAKAN wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:HURAKAN
yea, that Accuweather Track seems more realistic.
Could be too. What I find interesting is how large is the right side of the track compared to the left side.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests