ATL: TROPICAL DEPRESSION TWO - DISCUSSION

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#181 Postby HURAKAN » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:18 am

mvtrucking wrote:
Hurakan,
Am I reading this right? (About 20 kts SE over 96L )Thanks in advance


yes, 20 knots, which isn't that bad.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#182 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:19 am

Yep, you can see in the recorded data overnight that a low passed over the buoy in the Yucatan pass. Check this data. The winds dropped during the passage.

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42056
0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#183 Postby HouTXmetro » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:20 am

Can a pro met such as WXman or AFM chime in on what's going on today?
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#184 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:21 am

mvtrucking wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:
Image

wind shear isn't bad


Hurakan,
Am I reading this right? (About 20 kts SE over 96L )Thanks in advance


I don't know Hurakan, if take into account that 96L is moving NNW against this 20kt shear moving SSE it could actually be 30kt vertical wind shear at least in combination.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#185 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:24 am

HURAKAN wrote:
mvtrucking wrote:
Hurakan,
Am I reading this right? (About 20 kts SE over 96L )Thanks in advance


yes, 20 knots, which isn't that bad.


20kts is going to be pretty bad giving the actual shear levels going against 96L is going to be higher then 20kts given its forward speed it has right now.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

HurricaneRobert
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 9:31 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#186 Postby HurricaneRobert » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:25 am

Are there dueling centers? If it does develop it looks like it will form way to the south which would cause it to miss the Yucatan channel.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1792
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#187 Postby hurricaneCW » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:26 am

It seems like the Gulf, the Caribbean, and the rest of the Atlantic are still quite hostile. You can have a lot of upward motion, tons of convection, and very low pressures but if conditions aloft aren't conducive for all of that to spin up anything, than you won't get anything. I still think 96L will develop but it might be a slow process like Alex was. So far this season has a few anomalies that would support high activity such as water temperatures and low pressures.

Yet this season has a bit more negatives than 2005 had so far. Overall wind shear seems to be a great deal higher than 2005 was at this time and there is plenty of dry air around. However, once conditions improve just a little bit more than we should see many developments. If conditions were just a bit more favorable, all of the disturbances mentioned yesterday would have probably developed.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#188 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:28 am

I think the problem here is that the lower level say below 850mb is screaming toward the NNW thus the strong SSE winds and this in combination with the 20kt. shear out of the NW above is causing any mid and upper level structure to be left behind very quickly, thus all the mid level turning we are seeing to the SSE.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#189 Postby Dean4Storms » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:32 am

I think we still need to watch that area east of Honduras around 16.5n 84w, if it persists all day while the other low races away it could develop a surface low there as well.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#190 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:35 am

Yeah sounds about right Dean. If this hadn't occured we probably would have had a system develop out of that area today as it was starting to really look the part but now it seems to be in more trouble....

ps, as for your second post, the convection down there is fairly stubborn and obviously if we can keep the turning down there then we could well need to watch down there...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#191 Postby wxman57 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:51 am

Development chances definitely appear to be diminishing. Lowest pressures are in the Yucatan Channel, not near Honduras. Looked impressive yesterday but not now. And it looks like it may be inland into Louisiana or east Texas within 72 hours now. Not a lot of time for something so disorganized to develop. I think the NHC's 40% is quite generous. Maybe closer to 20%.
0 likes   

redfish1
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 125
Age: 44
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2010 9:24 pm
Location: Port Arthur, Tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#192 Postby redfish1 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 10:53 am

wxman57 wrote:Development chances definitely appear to be diminishing. Lowest pressures are in the Yucatan Channel, not near Honduras. Looked impressive yesterday but not now. And it looks like it may be inland into Louisiana or east Texas within 72 hours now. Not a lot of time for something so disorganized to develop. I think the NHC's 40% is quite generous. Maybe closer to 20%.


that is still 3 or 4 days over the GOM anything can happen
0 likes   

User avatar
AJC3
Admin
Admin
Posts: 3998
Age: 61
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:04 pm
Location: West Melbourne, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#193 Postby AJC3 » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:01 am

KWT wrote: 20kts is going to be pretty bad giving the actual shear levels going against 96L is going to be higher then 20kts given its forward speed it has right now.


Dean4Storms wrote:I think the problem here is that the lower level say below 850mb is screaming toward the NNW thus the strong SSE winds and this in combination with the 20kt. shear out of the NW above is causing any mid and upper level structure to be left behind very quickly, thus all the mid level turning we are seeing to the SSE.



The only reason one would even consider either adding or subtracting the storm motion vector to the magnitude of shear shown on the CIMSS shear product is if there is a huge disparity between the 925-700 mean environmental wind and the motion of the disturbance, since it is already vectorially subtracted from the mean upper level (150-300MB) wind to compute the shear.

In this case, the environmental wind looks to be pretty well aligned with the storm motion, so there is no reason to believe that there would be an increase in shear over the magnitude of what the CIMSS shear product is diagnosing.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143871
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#194 Postby cycloneye » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:03 am

TAFB position on 48 hours.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 62
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#195 Postby Portastorm » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:04 am

redfish1 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Development chances definitely appear to be diminishing. Lowest pressures are in the Yucatan Channel, not near Honduras. Looked impressive yesterday but not now. And it looks like it may be inland into Louisiana or east Texas within 72 hours now. Not a lot of time for something so disorganized to develop. I think the NHC's 40% is quite generous. Maybe closer to 20%.


that is still 3 or 4 days over the GOM anything can happen


Redfish1, while technically "anything can happen" in the GOM, you will see over time that wxman57 is a seasoned pro met who usually is spot on with his forecasts. Satellite this morning as well as all of the computer modeling fully support what he is saying. Also, if you look at the wind flow, lower level winds are screaming from the southeast and will indeed push this mess of clouds onto the coast late this week.
0 likes   

User avatar
Stephanie
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23843
Age: 62
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 9:53 am
Location: Glassboro, NJ

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#196 Postby Stephanie » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:07 am

Portastorm wrote:
redfish1 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Development chances definitely appear to be diminishing. Lowest pressures are in the Yucatan Channel, not near Honduras. Looked impressive yesterday but not now. And it looks like it may be inland into Louisiana or east Texas within 72 hours now. Not a lot of time for something so disorganized to develop. I think the NHC's 40% is quite generous. Maybe closer to 20%.


that is still 3 or 4 days over the GOM anything can happen


Redfish1, while technically "anything can happen" in the GOM, you will see over time that wxman57 is a seasoned pro met who usually is spot on with his forecasts. Satellite this morning as well as all of the computer modeling fully support what he is saying. Also, if you look at the wind flow, lower level winds are screaming from the southeast and will indeed push this mess of clouds onto the coast late this week.


Thank you Portastorm.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#197 Postby KWT » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:09 am

Portastorm wrote:
Redfish1, while technically "anything can happen" in the GOM, you will see over time that wxman57 is a seasoned pro met who usually is spot on with his forecasts. Satellite this morning as well as all of the computer modeling fully support what he is saying. Also, if you look at the wind flow, lower level winds are screaming from the southeast and will indeed push this mess of clouds onto the coast late this week.


Yeah I agree with this you can see the low level clouds really surging upto the NW/NNW through the Yucatan channel...

20kts of shear is still going to cause real issues when you've got an already messy situation aloft with large regions of convergence/divergence that are well spread out. Alex had similar problems before it finally got its act on.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#198 Postby srainhoutx » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:18 am

I am beginning to become concerned that yet another heavy rainfall event may play out across TX and LA. We certainly have been in a pattern to bring disturbances toward the Western Gulf this early season.
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#199 Postby rockyman » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:22 am

New convection is beginning to pop in Yucatan Channel, near the surface low.

I haven't looked too carefully yet, but the old GFS showed this type of solution (energy getting pulled rapidly north, leaving something behind) yesterday.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 62
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - DISCUSSION

#200 Postby Portastorm » Mon Jul 05, 2010 11:24 am

srainhoutx wrote:I am beginning to become concerned that yet another heavy rainfall event may play out across TX and LA. We certainly have been in a pattern to bring disturbances toward the Western Gulf this early season.


Agreed srain. EWX in their forecast discussion this morning mentioned an inverted trough along the Gulf Coast moving west into Texas later this week. Couple that with the potential of either 95L or 96L (or both) moving into the state and then ... BOOM ... flooding issues will quickly return.

BTW, interesting things happening with the remnants of Alex out in west central Texas. Copious rains falling and Amistad Reservoir (Del Rio) is now 3 feet over its flood pool level! Hasn't happened in many years.
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 38 guests