ATL: Ex INVEST 92L - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 28980
Age: 72
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Spring Branch area, Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#241 Postby vbhoutex » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:06 pm

mattpetre wrote:Wow, this system sure shows how quickly the weathervane of opinions can change in a day. I am with others on this that it will at least be raising eyes in the GOM. I think the high in TX is being given too much credit at this point for this storm. Seems to be retrograding and degrading both according to models and satellite presentation.

That is my concern as the high is expected to move further W iirc. That would tend to open up a weakness/avenue for what might develop to take a more NW or N course. IF that happens(way to early to come to any concrete conclusions)we could actually use the rain, but certainly don't want any major storms. Of course it also has to develop into a TC first.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#242 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:07 pm

Image

The MLC is looking more and more impressive
0 likes   

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 40
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

Re:

#243 Postby thetruesms » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:11 pm

HURAKAN wrote:An interesting image
The NDVI image on the bottom is actually not meant for weather surveillance, but to look at land cover - primarily vegetative density. That 92L is returning anything is more of a coincidence than anything else. Either that, or a bunch of plants sprung up underneath the system on top of the water really quickly :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: Re:

#244 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:12 pm

thetruesms wrote:
HURAKAN wrote:An interesting image
The NDVI image on the bottom is actually not meant for weather surveillance, but to look at land cover - primarily vegetative density. That 92L is returning anything is more of a coincidence than anything else. Either that, or a bunch of plants sprung up underneath the system on top of the water really quickly :lol:


lol ... thanks for the information ... but I liked the shape in the image
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22512
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#245 Postby wxman57 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:15 pm

Here are the charts I mentioned. 500mb (18,000ft) plotted for Fri, Sat and Sun. ECMWF in yellow, GFS in purple/pink. Note the eastward movement of the high in both models as a deep trof approaches from the west. This should prevent any movement northward by the disturbance.

Image

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#246 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:17 pm

La Ceiba, Honduras:

4 PM (20) Aug 06 80 (27) 77 (25) 29.88 (1011) S 7
3 PM (19) Aug 06 84 (29) 75 (24) 29.88 (1011) SSW 6 showers in the vicinity
2 PM (18) No Data
1 PM (17) Aug 06 87 (31) 75 (24) 29.91 (1012) N 7
Noon (16) Aug 06 87 (31) 73 (23) 29.91 (1012) N 7
11 AM (15) Aug 06 86 (30) 75 (24) 29.91 (1012) NW 5

10 AM (14) Aug 06 86 (30) 73 (23) 29.9 (1012) Calm
9 AM (13) Aug 06 78 (26) 73 (23) 29.89 (1012) Calm
8 AM (12) Aug 06 73 (23) 71 (22) 29.86 (1011) Calm
7 AM (11) Aug 06 73 (23) 71 (22) 29.89 (1012) Calm
6 AM (10) Aug 06 75 (24) 71 (22) 29.86 (1011) Calm
5 AM (9) No Data
4 AM (8) No Data
3 AM (7) Aug 06 75 (24) 75 (24) 29.87 (1011) Calm
2 AM (6) Aug 06 77 (25) 73 (23) 29.91 (1012) Calm
1 AM (5) Aug 06 77 (25) 73 (23) 29.88 (1011) Calm
Midnight (4) Aug 06 78 (26) 73 (23) 29.88 (1011) Calm
11 PM (3) Aug 05 80 (27) 73 (23) 29.87 (1011) Calm
10 PM (2) Aug 05 82 (28) 73 (23) 29.86 (1011) E 6
9 PM (1) Aug 05 82 (28) 73 (23) 29.9 (1012) NE 12
8 PM (0) Aug 05 86 (30) 73 (23) 29.82 (1009) NNE 13
7 PM (23) Aug 05 86 (30) 75 (24) 29.79 (1008) NE 13
6 PM (22) Aug 05 87 (31) 75 (24) 29.8 (1009) NNE 16
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#247 Postby lrak » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:20 pm

It looks like it's forward speed has slowed, if this thing slows way down what affect will the H pressure have later in the week?
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 28980
Age: 72
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Spring Branch area, Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#248 Postby vbhoutex » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:25 pm

Thanks for correcting me WXman57. I do not like to put out false info. Brain cells aren't capturing info like they used to. That makes me feel much better about this system.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22512
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#249 Postby wxman57 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:31 pm

lrak wrote:It looks like it's forward speed has slowed, if this thing slows way down what affect will the H pressure have later in the week?


High pressure is forecast to build southward over the western Gulf by Tuesday as the system moves into southern Mexico. It won't be out there in the BoC past then.
0 likes   

User avatar
lrak
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1770
Age: 57
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 2:48 pm
Location: Corpus Christi, TX

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#250 Postby lrak » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:36 pm

Thanks Wxman57, the waves will be going off as I look out my office window. :( Since its summer the taxpayers get a bit of time after work to catch leftovers.
0 likes   
AKA karl

Also
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts on this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. My posts are my basic observations and are definitely not backed by any "well some" meteorological knowledge. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#251 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:46 pm

The MLC or beginnings of a LLC, look more and more impressive by the minute
0 likes   

Hurricane

#252 Postby Hurricane » Fri Aug 06, 2010 3:51 pm

Wxman, this is getting it's act together, and I think this can form into Danielle or Earl before Tuesday (when the high moves in)
0 likes   

User avatar
chzzdekr81
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:54 pm
Location: Orange, Texas (SETX)
Contact:

#253 Postby chzzdekr81 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:02 pm

Can someone update the graphic to show 92L?
0 likes   
I survived Rita, Humberto, Edouard, and Ike.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#254 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:04 pm

Image

:eek: WOW :eek:
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139722
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#255 Postby cycloneye » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:05 pm

chzzdekr81 wrote:Can someone update the graphic to show 92L?


The graphic is automated.There has to be a glitch on it, but hopefully all is fixed soon.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#256 Postby hurricaneCW » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:09 pm

There's not enough time to organize. Also, the convection has weakened somewhat. At best a TD at this point
0 likes   

User avatar
chzzdekr81
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:54 pm
Location: Orange, Texas (SETX)
Contact:

Re:

#257 Postby chzzdekr81 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:11 pm

HURAKAN wrote: IMAGE

:eek: WOW :eek:

Wow is right.. :double:
0 likes   
I survived Rita, Humberto, Edouard, and Ike.

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 37
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#258 Postby HURAKAN » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:12 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:There's not enough time to organize. Also, the convection has weakened somewhat. At best a TD at this point


So, it's not going into Central America anymore? Keep downcasting everything.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1773
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#259 Postby hurricaneCW » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:13 pm

HURAKAN wrote:
hurricaneCW wrote:There's not enough time to organize. Also, the convection has weakened somewhat. At best a TD at this point


So, it's not going into Central America anymore? Keep downcasting everything.


It's going to hit the Yucatan in a day or so.
0 likes   

User avatar
chzzdekr81
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 189
Joined: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:54 pm
Location: Orange, Texas (SETX)
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - DISCUSSION

#260 Postby chzzdekr81 » Fri Aug 06, 2010 4:13 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:There's not enough time to organize. Also, the convection has weakened somewhat. At best a TD at this point

You have to remember though, this could still form in the BoC if it can't get its act together. I actually think the convection has strengthened. JMO.
0 likes   
I survived Rita, Humberto, Edouard, and Ike.


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests