ATL: MATTHEW - Ex-Tropical Storm - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#241 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:40 am

Image

Needs to move away from SA
0 likes   

Vortmax1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:35 pm
Location: Port Salerno, FL
Contact:

#242 Postby Vortmax1 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:41 am

Most likely those 20-25 knot trades are disruptive to any development in the current location. It looks like the shear is increasing a bit also.
Better chances for development will obviously be further West later tomorrow or Friday.
0 likes   

User avatar
ColinDelia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
Location: The Beach, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#243 Postby ColinDelia » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:43 am

ColinDelia wrote:I would point out that only a short while ago Karl became a tropical storm in the Caribbean.


What I meant is that Karl recently formed in the Caribbean despite the below seasonal value for "vertical instability" given in the plot
we are discussing. Are the values in that plot averaged over the entire Caribbean? It's not clear to me what the plot represents as far as WHERE in the Caribbean or if it is averaged over a few points or a gridded satellite average.

The most recent value given in the Caribbean plot looks to be about 5C whereas the number in the Tropical Atlantic, which has been a true breeding ground recently was between 3 and 4C.

Caribbean
Image

Tropical Atlantic (Note the vertical instability in this plot was less than the climatological normal during the recent period which was chalk full of Hurricanes)
Image

I don't know much about this. Just throwing it out there.
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re:

#244 Postby CourierPR » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:46 am

Vortmax1 wrote:Most likely those 20-25 knot trades are disruptive to any development in the current location. It looks like the shear is increasing a bit also.
Better chances for development will obviously be further West later tomorrow or Friday.
The comments in the Tropical Cyclone Formation Alert posted earlier seem to indicate an increasingly favorable environment for this developing system.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re:

#245 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:48 am

Vortmax1 wrote:As this day progresses Invest 95L is looking less organized with each new frame.
I take back what I said earlier about this being a developing system.
To be truly honest...this just looks like a Tropical Wave passing through the Caribbean right now.
Any development will not be happening in this current location.



Image


it was never forecast to develop in this area, its doing what was expected which is moving away from a an unfavorable area to a more favorable area and as a result you should start to see the percentage by NHC go up, its on track and on schedule
0 likes   

User avatar
btangy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:06 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

#246 Postby btangy » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:49 am

Hot of the press... we just had a dropsonde from the PREDICT-GV flight with southwesterly winds at 5-10 knots at 850 mb near Aruba, so it appears that there is a weak circulation forming N of the Gulf of Venezuela. We lost the drop data below that level, but the SW winds appear to extend through low-levels.
0 likes   

5KOVERLIBOR

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#247 Postby 5KOVERLIBOR » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:55 am

ColinDelia wrote:Tropical Atlantic (Note the vertical instability in this plot was less than the climatological normal during the recent period which was chalk full of Hurricanes)


Very true, but could we surmise that the ramp up in activity coincided with the significantly improving instability, even though it only seemed to achieve seasonal norm?

One other thing, is it not odd that various model outputs have 95L at times stationary over extremely high TCHPs and yet the output doesn't come close to suggesting an extremely powerful system as a result? Seems odd to me, but I am just an amateur seeking an education.
Last edited by 5KOVERLIBOR on Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

Vortmax1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:35 pm
Location: Port Salerno, FL
Contact:

#248 Postby Vortmax1 » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:58 am

it was never forecast to develop in this area, its doing what was expected which is moving away from a an unfavorable area to a more favorable area



Absolutely. That's what I said here.....Most likely those 20-25 knot trades are disruptive to any development in the current location. It looks like the shear is increasing a bit also.
Better chances for development will obviously be further West later tomorrow or Friday.


As of this moment it does not "look" like a developing system.
That is all.....
0 likes   

User avatar
btangy
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 758
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 11:06 pm
Location: Boulder, CO
Contact:

#249 Postby btangy » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:59 am

Looks like there's a nice curved band forming NW of Curacao. Although the convection isn't as prevalent as it was yesterday at this time, the structure is gradually improving.

http://www.weather.an/radar/cappicolor.html
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

Re:

#250 Postby artist » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:05 pm

btangy wrote:Hot of the press... we just had a dropsonde from the PREDICT-GV flight with southwesterly winds at 5-10 knots at 850 mb near Aruba, so it appears that there is a weak circulation forming N of the Gulf of Venezuela. We lost the drop data below that level, but the SW winds appear to extend through low-levels.


so it seems it is beginning to try to come together? Thanks for the info.
0 likes   

User avatar
artist
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9792
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: West Palm

#251 Postby artist » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:08 pm

btangy- is there anywhere we can access that data as it comes in?
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re:

#252 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:11 pm

Vortmax1 wrote:
it was never forecast to develop in this area, its doing what was expected which is moving away from a an unfavorable area to a more favorable area



Absolutely. That's what I said here.....Most likely those 20-25 knot trades are disruptive to any development in the current location. It looks like the shear is increasing a bit also.
Better chances for development will obviously be further West later tomorrow or Friday.


As of this moment it does not "look" like a developing system.
That is all.....


well it appears structure is better just not much convection, all in all it is slowly developing as we both thought it would for the same reason
0 likes   

User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5899
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#253 Postby MGC » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:18 pm

Looks like that ULL over PR moving westward might be a big fly in the ointment to 95L......MGC
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#254 Postby HURAKAN » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:24 pm

Image

Convergence has increased a lot
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L - Discussion

#255 Postby CourierPR » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:25 pm

MGC wrote:Looks like that ULL over PR moving westward might be a big fly in the ointment to 95L......MGC
If it were then I don't think the NHC would be assigning such a high probability for development.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#256 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:26 pm

Looks like it will take another 36 hours before any development.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#257 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:26 pm

Yeah its still a little too far east to really make the most of it but the conditions are getting there...

For those who argue it should be dropped even below 30%...look at how terrible Karl looked even 24-36hrs before it got upgraded...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re:

#258 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:29 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:Looks like it will take another 36 hours before any development.


24-36hrs seems reasonable, I expect 77-80W is the zone to watch for development, reminds me alot of Alex in that respect and developmental region maybe close to Alex as well...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
HurricaneBelle
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1179
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
Location: Clearwater, FL

#259 Postby HurricaneBelle » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:32 pm

Tampa Bay NWS acknowledges 95L's potential in their latest AFD:

CURRENTLY...THE ECMWF AND
GFS WANT TO PUSH A TROPICAL SYSTEM NORTHWARD FROM THE CARRIBEAN
HELPING TO KEEP THE EFFECTS OF THE OF THE MID LATITUDE SYSTEM
NORTH OF THE STATE. NEXT CONCERN IS THE FORMATION OF THE TROPICAL
SYSTEM AND THE NORTHWARD PROPAGATION TOWARDS THE STATE. ECMWF IS
MUCH QUICKER THAN GFS WHICH WOULD RESULT IN PUSHING EXCESS
MOISTURE INTO THE AREA BEGINNING TUES. REGARDLESS...SINCE THESE
FEATURES AND THEIR IMPACTS ARE IN THE TAIL-END OF THE MODEL
PACKAGES AND THE LONG TERM FORECAST...WILL NOT BITE ON THE
SOLUTIONS UNTIL THE SYSTEMS ACTUALLY BEGIN TO ORGANIZE AND MODELS
BECOME MUCH MORE CONSISTENT.
0 likes   

cwachal

#260 Postby cwachal » Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:33 pm

if it is going to develop in the same location as Alex... what makes you think that it will be stronger then Alex was at landfall in Mexico (1st landfall)?
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests