ATL: EX Tropical Depression FIVE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#301 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:13 am

It does develop it though, but yeah ECM on the 00z run wasn't really all that strong with its 00z run.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
thetruesms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 844
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:14 pm
Location: Tallahasee, FL
Contact:

#302 Postby thetruesms » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:45 am

If you're looking for a change of pace, the FL DoF MM5 model scrapes it up the Florida coast to near the Tampa Bay area, then shoots it off to the west. It barely sheds its remaining extratropical characteristics and has a point where it develops a funky tripole system kind of look, so it's not handling things well at all (honestly, pretty expected).

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#303 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:51 am

0 likes   

User avatar
HouTXmetro
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3949
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 6:00 pm
Location: District of Columbia, USA

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#304 Postby HouTXmetro » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:57 am

Whoa! that GFS looks WAYYY West
0 likes   
[Disclaimer: My Amateur Opinion, please defer to your local authorities or the NHC for Guidance.]

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#305 Postby Ikester » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:59 am

Wow, it sure does...
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#306 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Aug 10, 2010 10:59 am

Image
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

#307 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:00 am

Fairly weak on this run as well and way west just as you say, probably going to be a E.Texas hit on this run!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#308 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:03 am

well...hmm.....
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

#309 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:04 am

What happens is the GFS isn't spilting the ridge on this run as much.
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#310 Postby Portastorm » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:05 am

Is it all that different from yesterday's ... uh, what was it ... the 0z run? IIRC, that run had it paralleling the central Gulf Coast.
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

#311 Postby southerngale » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:08 am

And I thought the 06z GFS was just a fluke run when I posted it early this morning...

06z GFS
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#312 Postby Ikester » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:09 am

Portastorm wrote:Is it all that different from yesterday's ... uh, what was it ... the 0z run? IIRC, that run had it paralleling the central Gulf Coast.


Yes, but I think those models were initialized further north and had it bumping along the coast. Now it has it cutting across the central gulf. With the system diving southwest and the ULL pulling off to the NW, I think the models are sniffing a stronger system hints more the effect of the 500 mb flow. Like KFDM said, the ridge is not being split as much this go around (though yesterday the gfs did show an inverted trough near the upper Texas coast by Wednesday). Since the model is not bullish on development, the only logical explanation is the stronger ridge....as has been the case all freakin' summer. These models aren't handling the death ridge well at all.
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

#313 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:10 am

I agree!
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#314 Postby KWT » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:12 am

Portastorm wrote:Is it all that different from yesterday's ... uh, what was it ... the 0z run? IIRC, that run had it paralleling the central Gulf Coast.


I know the GFDL on one of its first run had a landfall in Texas and took it nearly due west from where it formed, so thats certainly something to keep an eye on.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#315 Postby Wx_Warrior » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:13 am

I had a feeling early morning there would be a western shift in models.
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#316 Postby srainhoutx » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:14 am

Rather weak 850 vort chart suggests 'landfall' in SW LA by hour 54-60 via the GFS.

Image
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#317 Postby Portastorm » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:14 am

Ikester wrote:
Portastorm wrote:Is it all that different from yesterday's ... uh, what was it ... the 0z run? IIRC, that run had it paralleling the central Gulf Coast.


Yes, but I think those models were initialized further north and had it bumping along the coast. Now it has it cutting across the central gulf. With the system diving southwest and the ULL pulling off to the NW, I think the models are sniffing a stronger system hints more the effect of the 500 mb flow. Like KFDM said, the ridge is not being split as much this go around (though yesterday the gfs did show an inverted trough near the upper Texas coast by Wednesday). Since the model is not bullish on development, the only logical explanation is the stronger ridge....as has been the case all freakin' summer. These models aren't handling the death ridge well at all.


Good points Ikester. Thanks for the clarification. You're sure right about "the death ridge."
0 likes   

User avatar
KFDM Meteorologist
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1314
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 9:52 pm
Location: Upper Texas Coast/Orange County

#318 Postby KFDM Meteorologist » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:15 am

0 likes   

rockyman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1967
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 12:24 pm
Location: Dauphin Island, AL

#319 Postby rockyman » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:16 am

the 12z Canadian-Regional takes the system NNW/NW toward Apalachicola, then does a left turn and skirts the coast all the way into New Orleans:

http://www.weatheroffice.gc.ca/model_fo ... 12_....jpg
0 likes   

Ikester
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 361
Age: 39
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 5:00 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 94L - Models

#320 Postby Ikester » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:17 am

Ponder this...**IF** this thing blew up into a Cat 2 or 3 (god forbid worse), residents from Texas to Louisiana have 2-3 days to prepare and evacuate. Talk about an evacuation nightmare...especially for the Houston area with 6 million people!
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests