ATL: KARL - Ex-Hurricane - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Aquawind
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6714
Age: 61
Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:41 pm
Location: Salisbury, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#421 Postby Aquawind » Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:41 pm

Bailey1777 wrote:question, if a circulation seems to be absent what is giving 92 such banding?



Most of those clouds showing the spin are not at the surface and thus mid-upper level clouds..not much rain is coming from that area as the deep convection is gone..deep convection is firing on the parimeter but the twist is not at the surface..
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

#422 Postby Steve » Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:42 pm

>>question, if a circulation seems to be absent what is giving 92 such banding?

There is a general rotation which is plainly visible on visible.
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-vis.html

I haven't looked at the charts, but I'd guess a broad area of low pressure at or somewhat near the surface. To me, it doesn't appear to be an upper feature, but Aquawind said he thought it was.
0 likes   

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 29096
Age: 73
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Cypress, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#423 Postby vbhoutex » Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:44 pm

Bailey1777 wrote:question, if a circulation seems to be absent what is giving 92 such banding?

The basic answer to that is that what you are seeing is in the mid and upper levels of the atmosphere. For 92L to become anything(meaning a TC) that upper circulation has to work down to the surface and it doesn't seem in any hurry to do so attm.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image

User avatar
ColinDelia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
Location: The Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#424 Postby ColinDelia » Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:44 pm

Pretty good circulation at 850 mb. This is the highest vorticity we've seen yet.
So looks pretty good at 5000 feet or whatever height that is. Not sure about at the surface.

Also looks good but a little weaker at 750 mb and not much at all near the center at 500 mb.
So seems like a circulation in the bottom part of the mid-levels more than anywhere else.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9591
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

#425 Postby Steve » Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:52 pm

>>Also looks good but a little weaker at 750 mb and not much at all near the center at 500 mb. So seems like a circulation in the bottom part of the mid-levels more than anywhere else.

So it's a lower mid-level feature there (within a mile of the surface+/-). I guess that makes sense because those tend to pulse every day absent something strong at the surface (or when detached/sheared). There aren't that many surface observation points in that area, so it's hard to tell if anything is happening at sea level. But it seems to have some broad turning at least in the lower levels. JMO though as it could be part of a surge of southeasterlies.
0 likes   

User avatar
ColinDelia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 918
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 5:52 am
Location: The Beach, FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#426 Postby ColinDelia » Sat Sep 11, 2010 4:59 pm

850 mb vorticity
Image

700 mb vorticity
Image

500 mb vorticity
Image
0 likes   

User avatar
expat2carib
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 1:44 pm
Location: Sint Maarten

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#427 Postby expat2carib » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:01 pm

jinftl wrote:Agree...there have been tropical waves and tropical depressions that have brought unimaginable flooding and distress to haiti. This doesn't need to be a Cat 4 to wreack havoc. In May 2004, a tropical disturbance (not even a depression) killed 2600 in haiti as it dumped 18 inches of rain in a 3-day period. We can only hope 92L moves out quickly and doesn't linger.

expat2carib wrote:
bvigal wrote:Noticing how much precip has spread out, now rain to ABCs, and to Dominican republic, and also into the Atlantic waters north of us. As Aquawind commented, "it has expanded." Really concerned for Haiti.
8:15AST
http://img201.imageshack.us/img201/7575 ... rb1215.gif
3:15AST
http://img808.imageshack.us/img808/6250 ... rb1915.gif


Yes I'm really concerned for Haiti as well. Most of us on the islands are sitting "high and dry" and can sit a storm out.

They can NOT on Haiti!


Here on Dominica, one of the poorest islands in the Caribbean, even the fishermen that pulll their boats on the beach too make a bed for the night out of it, go uphill to find a safe house with family, friends or churches.

They know when the water gets high and the galvanized starts flying they have to seek shelter.

For the Haitians there IS no shelter. Hundred thousands of them live in tents or on the street.

Let's hope it will be over soon, even that it's probably just a TD when it pass over.
Last edited by expat2carib on Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Houstonia
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 829
Age: 60
Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 9:45 am
Location: Sharpstown, Houston, Harris County, Southeast Texas.

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#428 Postby Houstonia » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:03 pm

Just curious - I see a lot of predictions of this invest moving into Mexico. Isn't that further than the 5-day cone of prediction? How come so many people already know it's a Mexico storm? Can predictions be made with a high level of certainty at this point? I don't mind the predictions, just curious about the certainty. Thanks.

gatorcane wrote:
vbhoutex wrote:
not like its that defined of a center.. or anything its very broad and likely barely hanging on...

I'm not even sure I agree that it has a center unless it is a MLC we are talking about. Definitely is pulsing down right now and throwing out several outflow boundaries on the SE side. Not good for development last time I checked. If it hangs on I have to agree it will be at least Monday before I think 92L consolidates enough to be classified. Meanwhile PR etc are getting too much rain. Hopefully this phase will alleviate some of that rain for a while.



Yeah as expected development, if any, would be slow to occur. I think it's got a shot in the western Caribbean before moving inland into Mexico.
0 likes   

Saints
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2010 9:16 pm

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#429 Postby Saints » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:05 pm

I see this system developing quite rapidly like one of the models predicted. Unless it ends up over the mountains of the islands and is impeded. The area of the Caribbean it is over and is projected to traverse, has had virtually no tropical activity this season. With this said, some of the models are probably on to something. As a matter of fact, it would not surprise me to see a Gilbert type track, but not with the intensity of a Gilbert. That would be very foolish to even remotely predict a storm of that magnitude.

The NHC has a good grasp on things folks. They do the best job around, without question. I saw some one of their initial model forecasts Thursday afternoon, taking it NW, then WNW over Jamaica and then west, towards the general direction of the western tip of Cuba/Yucatan channel. It appears like this will be the track the way things are shaping up, which is pretty remarkable. That's crazy how accurate they have become. Just my opinion.

Thank goodness for the forecasted high pressure setting up over the GOM, to protect the U.S.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143881
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#430 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:06 pm

Aric,do you see something that gets your attention from the data of this bouy located at 15N-67W? Or nothing to open eyebrows?

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42059
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#431 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:19 pm

cycloneye wrote:Aric,do you see something that gets your attention from the data of this bouy located at 15N-67W? Or nothing to open eyebrows?

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42059


I have been watching it all day actually and its been veering from NE to now east. so if there is anything at the surface it would have to be south of there somewhere.. which would place something closer to the mid level circ. but the one observation could point to a surface circ or it could point to a open wave just as easy. if there were more observations near by then we could say something. right now im leaning towards very little at the surface. if convection begins to build associated with the MLC then its possible there is a weak surface reflection. So more waiting ...
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#432 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:20 pm

UL outflow looks fairly good, this could get going overnight and into tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143881
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#433 Postby cycloneye » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:22 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Aric,do you see something that gets your attention from the data of this bouy located at 15N-67W? Or nothing to open eyebrows?

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42059


I have been watching it all day actually and its been veering from NE to now east. so if there is anything at the surface it would have to be south of there somewhere.. which would place something closer to the mid level circ. but the one observation could point to a surface circ or it could point to a open wave just as easy. if there were more observations near by then we could say something. right now im leaning towards very little at the surface. if convection begins to build associated with the MLC then its possible there is a weak surface reflection. So more waiting ...


Thank you for your always to the point observations.Keep them comming. :)
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#434 Postby Dean4Storms » Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:23 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Aric,do you see something that gets your attention from the data of this bouy located at 15N-67W? Or nothing to open eyebrows?

http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42059


I have been watching it all day actually and its been veering from NE to now east. so if there is anything at the surface it would have to be south of there somewhere.. which would place something closer to the mid level circ. but the one observation could point to a surface circ or it could point to a open wave just as easy. if there were more observations near by then we could say something. right now im leaning towards very little at the surface. if convection begins to build associated with the MLC then its possible there is a weak surface reflection. So more waiting ...



Pretty sure this is just a wave with broad low pressure still, seen nothing to indicate a closed surface low. Like Aric said, if convection can fire near the wave axis/MLC spin and persist it could get a surface reflection going and work toward closing off.
0 likes   

User avatar
Macrocane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4218
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 5:35 pm
Location: El Salvador

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#435 Postby Macrocane » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:01 pm

Just like yesterday and the day before the cloud tops have warmed a lot, let's see if tonights d-max is the definitive one.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kludge
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 215
Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 9:03 pm
Location: Bedias, Texas

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#436 Postby Kludge » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:07 pm

Houstonia wrote:Just curious - I see a lot of predictions of this invest moving into Mexico. Isn't that further than the 5-day cone of prediction? How come so many people already know it's a Mexico storm? Can predictions be made with a high level of certainty at this point? I don't mind the predictions, just curious about the certainty. Thanks.


Houstonia....
Please realize... they don't "know". A number of folks on this board prognosticate as if they have some form of devine insight. You and I know they don't, and are simply using their hindsight and luck to take an educated (hopefully) guess as to what will happen.

The fun part of this is that man still doesn't have the tools to predict with certainty what will happen, so this is one of the few remaining frontiers where folks like me and you can come laugh at the "experts" who claim to know the final outcome of these amazing wonders of the world.

Note that some of the posters are labeled as "pros", which, although they are skilled forecasters, means they don't have to include the disclaimer "in my opinion". Just grin and let it go... and use the NHC as your source for infomation regarding hurricane preparedness...
0 likes   

jinftl
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4312
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:47 pm
Location: fort lauderdale, fl

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#437 Postby jinftl » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:12 pm

I'm sure some of the more experienced posters could elaborate on this better - but if there is no closed, low level circulation at this point, putting too much weight on what model runs are saying right now is educated guessing at best - or a crap shoot.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#438 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:17 pm

jinftl wrote:I'm sure some of the more experienced posters could elaborate on this better - but if there is no closed, low level circulation at this point, putting too much weight on what model runs are saying right now is educated guessing at best - or a crap shoot.


well in every case they are educated guesses ... of course some guess are more educated than others.. lol but in general organization and strength play a role in track. take for instance the HWRF it has been little stronger and much more north.. same with the NAM and CMC. the models that have more of a northerly component develop it faster.. So in general we dont exactly know what will happen right now. if it develops we will have a better understanding so we just have to wait.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
latitude_20
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 196
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 6:46 am
Location: Tulum, Mexico
Contact:

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#439 Postby latitude_20 » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:17 pm

Methinks we need a recon mission to get better measurements for the models to work with?
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL : INVEST 92L - Discussion

#440 Postby wxman57 » Sat Sep 11, 2010 6:23 pm

Houstonia wrote:Just curious - I see a lot of predictions of this invest moving into Mexico. Isn't that further than the 5-day cone of prediction? How come so many people already know it's a Mexico storm? Can predictions be made with a high level of certainty at this point? I don't mind the predictions, just curious about the certainty. Thanks.


Disturbances and storms track along with the winds aloft. If the winds above a system are blowing from east to west, then the system moves to the west. The models are fairly good at predicting the positions of highs and lows in the middle and upper part of the atmosphere for 5 days out and often quite farther out.

In this case, the models are indicating that the high pressure area over Texas in the mid levels of the atmosphere will extend eastward across the Gulf over the coming week. That means the winds aloft will be blowing from east to west across the western Caribbean and southern Gulf of Mexico. And since the winds aloft are blowing to the west, that's where the disturbance (or storm) should go. It will move westward to the south of the big area of high pressure to its north.

Here's a map showing the predicted position of the high center by both the American GFS model and the European model for next Wednesday. With that kind of flow present when the disturbance reaches near the Yucatan, it really can't turn north or head to Texas. That is, unless all the models are completely wrong about the position of the high center.

Image
0 likes   


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests