ATL: KARL - Ex-Hurricane - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re:

#761 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:49 pm

HURAKAN wrote:The NE quadrant should be more interesting!


In a west-moving storm, the NW quad should be strongest.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#762 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:49 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:Will we get a Special Advisory, a TCU on a new storm or just wait until 5 pm?


they will probably do a special advisory since its so close to land...
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

cwachal

#763 Postby cwachal » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:49 pm

I think special advisory with 35 knts and then at 5 they will update it with new information from recon
0 likes   

Vortmax1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:35 pm
Location: Port Salerno, FL
Contact:

#764 Postby Vortmax1 » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:50 pm

The NE quadrant should be more interesting!



LOL...No joke!
I can't wait to see the rest of this system!!
0 likes   

User avatar
South Texas Storms
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4202
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion - RENUMBER to Tropical Storm

#765 Postby South Texas Storms » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:50 pm

finally this one develops...
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 37991
Age: 36
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion - RENUMBER to Tropical Storm

#766 Postby Brent » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:53 pm

Finally!
0 likes   
#neversummer

kevin

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#767 Postby kevin » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:56 pm

Any chance of a threat to Florida?
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#768 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:57 pm

kevin wrote:Any chance of a threat to Florida?


Virtually no chance unless a trough can get that low, and in mid-September that is highly unlikely.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#769 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:57 pm

kevin wrote:Any chance of a threat to Florida?


0% ... no worries, it has Mexico tattooed.
0 likes   

User avatar
HURAKAN
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 46086
Age: 38
Joined: Thu May 20, 2004 4:34 pm
Location: Key West, FL
Contact:

#770 Postby HURAKAN » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:59 pm

Image

Latest
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#771 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:59 pm

Not much of an inner core, that might be a saving grace for the Yucatan.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143917
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#772 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:00 pm

That was just after 8 AM.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#773 Postby BigA » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:05 pm

It's a shame that some place in Mexico may well be preparing for a hurricane on the day of their bicentennial (Sept 16)
0 likes   

Vortmax1
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 360
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:35 pm
Location: Port Salerno, FL
Contact:

#774 Postby Vortmax1 » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:12 pm

Yep...here we go.
Storm 13!


Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFloridawx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8345
Age: 46
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 1:16 am
Location: Sarasota, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#775 Postby SouthFloridawx » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:12 pm

Image
0 likes   

pcolaman
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 380
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:33 am
Location: Pensacola Fla

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#776 Postby pcolaman » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:14 pm

SouthFloridawx wrote:Image

Looking like banding is going on now
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#777 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:17 pm

The next set of Models will be better now that we have a position they all can agree on and a strength ... right now there so spread because they have it initialized all over the place.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

cpdaman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3131
Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 11:44 am
Location: SPB county (gulf stream)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#778 Postby cpdaman » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:17 pm

is there any indication that this may not make the BOC by much....i.e further south than models forecast?

i believe there is a sentiment to a degree that we have waited so long for this to develop that we want something to track now that it is here....

where's WXMAN 57.....

i would like his take on track of (future karl?)
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#779 Postby BigA » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:24 pm

cpdaman wrote:is there any indication that this may not make the BOC by much....i.e further south than models forecast?

i believe there is a sentiment to a degree that we have waited so long for this to develop that we want something to track now that it is here....

where's WXMAN 57.....

i would like his take on track of (future karl?)
\

Unless the 18Z and 00Z models are drastically different from the 12Z, it should make it at least into the southern BOC. The steering flow looks like there will be a northerly component to Karl's motion until it gets to the Yucatan, which should give it enough latitude to get back over water.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#780 Postby Aric Dunn » Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:25 pm

cpdaman wrote:is there any indication that this may not make the BOC by much....i.e further south than models forecast?

i believe there is a sentiment to a degree that we have waited so long for this to develop that we want something to track now that it is here....

where's WXMAN 57.....

i would like his take on track of (future karl?)


If it moves in a west motion from this point it would be barely in the BOC mostly over land... but it appears its moving slightly north of west right now. Also as the system gets deeper the steering is a little flatter ( more east to west ) so it would likely move WNW and get into the BOC at which time the steering may get a little weak before the ridge builds in stronger and it should push it west or WSW
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...


Return to “2010”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests