ATL: EMILY - Remnants
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
whats going BOOM? it is a mess....almost looks sheared apart. Looks worse than this morning...
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-rgb.html
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-rgb.html
0 likes
- mvtrucking
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 698
- Age: 66
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 10:01 am
- Location: Monroe,La
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Is it my eyes or is this system moving towards the north now?
0 likes
- TheDreamTraveler
- Category 2
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 3:10 am
- Location: PA
Re:
Weatherfreak000 wrote:Models getting more and more keen on the recurve solution, has been the case for the past 48 hours.
Actually, models becoming "less" keen on a potential recurve. There's a big difference compared with the latest run of computer models. Always follow the trends.
0 likes
- somethingfunny
- ChatStaff
- Posts: 3926
- Age: 37
- Joined: Thu May 31, 2007 10:30 pm
- Location: McKinney, Texas
Let's get this storm to develop a center before we start arguing about its' track, lol. Come on guys.
My amateur opinion? It's surrounded by dry air and it's still early for Cape Verde storms. I think it develops but it struggles, and it's more likely to be a tropical storm than it is to be anything else when it moves through the islands. Afterwards, we'll see what the trough and the ridge are doing and where 91L/Emily ends up being located. If it takes longer to develop, it will be further south and west than if it deepens quickly.

My amateur opinion? It's surrounded by dry air and it's still early for Cape Verde storms. I think it develops but it struggles, and it's more likely to be a tropical storm than it is to be anything else when it moves through the islands. Afterwards, we'll see what the trough and the ridge are doing and where 91L/Emily ends up being located. If it takes longer to develop, it will be further south and west than if it deepens quickly.
0 likes
I am not a meteorologist, and any posts made by me are not official forecasts or to be interpreted as being intelligent. These posts are just my opinions and are probably silly opinions.
Re: Re:
This far out, and with the several hundred mile margin of error going out after 5 days, it is really the trends between the models, and between the model runs, that will be most telling at this point.
Without a center yet, a 50 or 100 mile difference in where an actual LLC develops could have major implications for future models runs....
Without a center yet, a 50 or 100 mile difference in where an actual LLC develops could have major implications for future models runs....
TheDreamTraveler wrote:Weatherfreak000 wrote:Models getting more and more keen on the recurve solution, has been the case for the past 48 hours.
Actually, models becoming "less" keen on a potential recurve. There's a big difference compared with the latest run of computer models. Always follow the trends.
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
- Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)
Re: Re:
TwisterFanatic wrote:Weatherfreak000 wrote:Models getting more and more keen on the recurve solution, has been the case for the past 48 hours.
Sorry, but I hate the word recurve when it's a potentially significant problem to PR, Dominican Republic, Haiti and possibly the Bahama's.
Recurve should be used when it's forecast to curve out to sea without impacting any land.
Besides, I don't know how you get that based on the 3 graphics posted above.
I thought that too a couple of pages back. but i got corrected or so it seemed and apparently when it doesnt affect any land masses, it is called a fish, and when it recurves, it heads out to sea. idk its confusing now. besides lets not forget about Bermuda, but yeah i get ya.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
so who is saying it wont make a caribbean cruise? who is all for recurve?
heres an outlier for you........
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/cg ... t=Tropical
heres an outlier for you........

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/cg ... t=Tropical
0 likes
- 'CaneFreak
- Category 5
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
- Location: New Bern, NC
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
And where is the evidence of shear if I might ask? JUST curious...that's all

ROCK wrote:whats going BOOM? it is a mess....almost looks sheared apart. Looks worse than this morning...
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-rgb.html
0 likes
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Re: Re:
HurricaneWarning92 wrote:TwisterFanatic wrote:Weatherfreak000 wrote:Models getting more and more keen on the recurve solution, has been the case for the past 48 hours.
Sorry, but I hate the word recurve when it's a potentially significant problem to PR, Dominican Republic, Haiti and possibly the Bahama's.
Recurve should be used when it's forecast to curve out to sea without impacting any land.
Besides, I don't know how you get that based on the 3 graphics posted above.
I thought that too a couple of pages back. but i got corrected or so it seemed and apparently when it doesnt affect any land masses, it is called a fish, and when it recurves, it heads out to sea. idk its confusing now. besides lets not forget about Bermuda, but yeah i get ya.
Yea, I know, that's just something that's always bugged me.

0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re: Re:
TheDreamTraveler wrote:Weatherfreak000 wrote:Models getting more and more keen on the recurve solution, has been the case for the past 48 hours.
Actually, models becoming "less" keen on a potential recurve. There's a big difference compared with the latest run of computer models. Always follow the trends.
GFS trended way east, with a faster recurve, than the previous run. Lets see what the rest of the 00z models do.
TwisterFanatic wrote:Weatherfreak000 wrote:Models getting more and more keen on the recurve solution, has been the case for the past 48 hours.
Sorry, but I hate the word recurve when it's a potentially significant problem to PR, Dominican Republic, Haiti and possibly the Bahama's.
Recurve should be used when it's forecast to curve out to sea without impacting any land.
Besides, I don't know how you get that based on the 3 graphics posted above.
Again, what you are talking about is a "fish" system, one that affects no land, only the fishes. A recurve is... well... anything that recurves!
0 likes
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
- Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
ROCK wrote:so who is saying it wont make a caribbean cruise? who is all for recurve?
heres an outlier for you........![]()
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/cg ... t=Tropical
Lmao. that would prove a lot of people wrong since it almost seems like it is heading towards Cuba or the western Caribbean.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
'CaneFreak wrote:And where is the evidence of shear if I might ask? JUST curious...that's all
ROCK wrote:whats going BOOM? it is a mess....almost looks sheared apart. Looks worse than this morning...
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-rgb.html
"looks like" I can read shear maps..

0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
HurricaneWarning92 wrote:ROCK wrote:so who is saying it wont make a caribbean cruise? who is all for recurve?
heres an outlier for you........![]()
https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/cg ... t=Tropical
Lmao. that would prove a lot of people wrong since it almost seems like it is heading towards Cuba or the western Caribbean.
some people never learn....

0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
- Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)
lol im still confused cause a fish would also "recurve" out to sea... but who knows. lets just drop this discussion altogether and get back in topic.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- TwisterFanatic
- Category 5
- Posts: 1041
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
- Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma
Wouldn't be surprised if the NHC drops it to 80% next update. Kinda messy right now, the longer it stays like this the less likely it's pulled northward.
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- 'CaneFreak
- Category 5
- Posts: 1486
- Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:50 am
- Location: New Bern, NC
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Sorry, but what I see is a weak anticyclone slowly moving over the top of this thing...and I can read a shear map believe it or not...it is still sitting in 5 to 10 knots of shear near the center...
ROCK wrote:'CaneFreak wrote:And where is the evidence of shear if I might ask? JUST curious...that's all
ROCK wrote:whats going BOOM? it is a mess....almost looks sheared apart. Looks worse than this morning...
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-rgb.html
"looks like" I can read shear maps....it has become elongated again and stretched out...convection to the SW...looks more impressive...
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Well this one hasn't taken off as quickly as its earlier appearance would have suggested. Still think we get Emily out of this but it still has alot of work to do.
GFS has been consistent with its out to sea forecast and other models have shifted closer to that solution so it has to be given quite a bit of attention as the main scenario. However we will get better data ingested once the gulfstreams start flying and that may or may not change things up.
GFS has been consistent with its out to sea forecast and other models have shifted closer to that solution so it has to be given quite a bit of attention as the main scenario. However we will get better data ingested once the gulfstreams start flying and that may or may not change things up.
0 likes
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
- Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)
Re:
TwisterFanatic wrote:Wouldn't be surprised if the NHC drops it to 80% next update. Kinda messy right now, the longer it stays like this the less likely it's pulled northward.
Like mvtrucking said, isnt it going more northward?
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- Evil Jeremy
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 5463
- Age: 32
- Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Re:
TwisterFanatic wrote:Wouldn't be surprised if the NHC drops it to 80% next update. Kinda messy right now, the longer it stays like this the less likely it's pulled northward.
It's still likely to get pulled north, how much is the question.
Anyways, my guess is that they stick to 90% for continuity.
0 likes
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests