ATL: KATIA - Post Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#221 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:37 pm

https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/cg ... t=Tropical



18Z NOGAPS looks to recurve...I think its doing so much more quickly..entertainment purposes only....
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#222 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 28, 2011 10:38 pm

should be classified in the morning if convection holds....which I think it will...this is the one JB is ranting over....already....
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#223 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:04 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#224 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:10 pm

84hr

still westward bound with ridge on top of her....

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appc ... mageSize=M
0 likes   

HurricaneWarning92
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, S. Florida (Lat: 26.00N, Lon: 80.22W)

#225 Postby HurricaneWarning92 » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:19 pm

Well unless a ridge builds in the western Atlantic, this will only have to go somewhere... through that gap... towards Bermuda... so if that scenario verifies, hed be wrong, by a long shot...
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#226 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:24 pm

well below 15N and almost to 50W...at 129hr

still slightly under the ridge....should start gaining some lat soon...

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appc ... mageSize=M

171hr...starting to curve on out...

http://mag.ncep.noaa.gov/NCOMAGWEB/appc ... mageSize=M
0 likes   

Dydion
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:32 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#227 Postby Dydion » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:26 pm

I realize JB blogs on a premiere site, a website requiring a pay subscription, but is there anywhere we can read what he says without having to pay for a subscription? His quotes and paraphrases by the members on here has built up my respect for him and I'd really like to follow along with what he says about the "K" storm now a'brewing.

Mucho gracias...
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145292
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#228 Postby cycloneye » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:48 pm

Passes very close to the east of Bermuda and then goes north to make landfall in Nova Scotia.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#229 Postby BigA » Sun Aug 28, 2011 11:56 pm

cycloneye wrote:Passes very close to the east of Bermuda and then goes north to make landfall in Nova Scotia.


Interesting run. Im surprised about how it goes due north at about 62 west from 30 north to 43 or so north. Interesting pattern. Is the ridge to the east blocking it from fully recurving?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145292
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#230 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:04 am

BigA wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Passes very close to the east of Bermuda and then goes north to make landfall in Nova Scotia.


Interesting run. Im surprised about how it goes due north at about 62 west from 30 north to 43 or so north. Interesting pattern. Is the ridge to the east blocking it from fully recurving?


In other words,the term "fish" does not apply here as it threats Bermuda and makes a landfall.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
WxGuy1
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 538
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: Oklahoma

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#231 Postby WxGuy1 » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:08 am

Let's look at the forecast upper-tropospheric map to find troughs or ridges that will partly determine where this storm can go. Load up the following link, which will show a loop from several of the past GFS model runs of 300 mb heights and winds:

http://www.twisterdata.com/index.php?pr ... hive=false

Every map in that animation/loop is valid for the same time (12z Wednesday, Sept. 7th), with different frames representing model runs from the past few days. Notice that every run shows some sort of trough over the eastern US coastline or far western Atlantic. The details of that trough vary -- some runs show a stronger, more amplified trough, and others show a little weaker, less amplified trough. However, The GFS, at least, remains very consistent on developing a relatively sizeable mid- and upper-level trough over the eastern U.S. and/or the western Atlantic. This would almost certainly push the tropical cyclone to higher latitudes and help prevent a major U.S. hit. There may be a window if the storm can stay very far south (below 15 degrees N), but few models are suggesting that. Of course, there's also the possibility that the forecasts will change. All we know at this time is that the GFS has, over many runs, indicated a large trough that would act to prevent the storm from hitting the U.S.

Remember, as much as we all want to know forecasts with certainty, that's just not possible, particularly since we're talking about something >7 days away, and we're talking about something that hasn't even developed yet. This isn't about "There's 0% chance this will get within 1000 miles of the U.S." vs. "This won't be a fish -- the models will trend west and we'll see a hit on the U.S.". All we can really do is use probabilities (qualitatively or quantitatively). At this point, I'd say that this invest is UNLIKELY to affect the U.S. That doesn't mean it's not possible, certainly, sine it's just not possible to know with certainty right now. I should note that if landfall does occur with this next system, it doesn't mean that it wasn't unlikely to occur at this point in time. We're talking about a very long-range (almost comically long range) forecast of an undeveloped cyclone, after all!
Last edited by WxGuy1 on Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
BigA
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1317
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 10:56 pm

#232 Postby BigA » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:23 am

00 GFS ensembles run

http://raleighwx.americanwx.com/models/ ... _Loop.html

Earl-like path in the long run according to the ensembles, it looks like.

Something of an aside, but can someone learned explain to me why the ensembles are well to the west of the operational GFS? Shouldn't the ensembles be on average equally to the right and to the left of the operational, if they work based on slight perturbations in the initial position? Or is there another factor that goes into them that could cause them to deviate greatly from the operational model?


Much thanks!
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145292
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#233 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:37 am

SHOWERS AND THUNDERSTORMS CONTINUE TO BECOME BETTER ORGANIZED IN
ASSOCIATION WITH A LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM LOCATED ABOUT 375 MILES
SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERN CAPE VERDE ISLANDS...AND A TROPICAL
DEPRESSION COULD BE FORMING. IF CURRENT TRENDS CONTINUE...
ADVISORIES WILL LIKELY BE INITIATED LATER THIS MORNING.
THIS SYSTEM
HAS A HIGH CHANCE...NEAR 100 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL
CYCLONE DURING THE NEXT 48 HOURS AS IT MOVES WESTWARD OR
WEST-NORTHWESTWARD AT AROUND 15 MPH.

0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

jabman98
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 379
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 12:15 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#234 Postby jabman98 » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:20 am

Dydion wrote:I realize JB blogs on a premiere site, a website requiring a pay subscription, but is there anywhere we can read what he says without having to pay for a subscription? His quotes and paraphrases by the members on here has built up my respect for him and I'd really like to follow along with what he says about the "K" storm now a'brewing.

Mucho gracias...

He's on Twitter, so you could follow him there. You'd get a flavor of what he's thinking, but not full analysis.

92L looks like it's got the makings of a big storm. Feel like I've hardly caught my breath and now here comes another one. Tis the season, I guess.
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneMaster_PR
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 6:23 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#235 Postby HurricaneMaster_PR » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:25 am

DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
29/0545 UTC 9.0N 26.5W T1.5/1.5 92L
28/2345 UTC 9.3N 24.4W T1.5/1.5 92L
0 likes   

User avatar
HurricaneMaster_PR
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 795
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2003 6:23 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#236 Postby HurricaneMaster_PR » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:30 am

Latest TAFB Surface Forecast (72 hrs)

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#237 Postby Cyclenall » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:47 am

HurricaneMaster_PR wrote:DATE/TIME LAT LON CLASSIFICATION STORM
29/0545 UTC 9.0N 26.5W T1.5/1.5 92L
28/2345 UTC 9.3N 24.4W T1.5/1.5 92L

Interesting, if I'm reading that correctly future Katia lost some latitude there by 0.3º.
0 likes   

User avatar
TwisterFanatic
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1041
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 12:43 pm
Location: Sallisaw, Oklahoma

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Models

#238 Postby TwisterFanatic » Mon Aug 29, 2011 2:49 am

EURO not as strong as 12z, and also a bit further west, but overall same story.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

bexar
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 182
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2011 11:23 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#239 Postby bexar » Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:01 am

now TD12 as per navy site
0 likes   

Adoquín
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 140
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 8:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#240 Postby Adoquín » Mon Aug 29, 2011 3:18 am

wxman57 wrote:
painkillerr wrote:
wxman57 wrote:A good argument for this disturbance gaining latitude more quickly than the pre-Irene disturbance would be the general low pressure to its north. For Irene, the SAL was VERY strong due to a massive high to its north. Not so with this disturbance:

Wxman57, If I read you correctly, the strong SAL over Irene impeded her development until she approached 50w + or -. This is not so with 92L so development is likely to happen sooner (as it is already happenning). My question is, couldn't the high to the north impede the gain in latitude even if the SAL is not so strong?


There isn't much of a high to the north compared to when Irene was tracking west across the Atlantic. The earlier development will also significantly increase the chance of it passing north of the Caribbean and recurving out to sea well east of the U.S. The 12z Euro is in through 144 hours, indicating a path north of the eastern Caribbean with a deep trof in its path just west of Bermuda. That would give it a clear shot to recurve between 55-65W.


anything less than a recurve before 60 likely a problem for the northeast caribbean
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests