CronkPSU wrote:up to 70 mph winds at 11...993 mb
and the cone is right of the 5pm cone...good call guys, i was wrong
landfall at Jacksonville ????? Really ????? Wow.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
CronkPSU wrote:up to 70 mph winds at 11...993 mb
and the cone is right of the 5pm cone...good call guys, i was wrong
maxintensity wrote:Interesting the NHC still only expects a cat 1 out of this. I think the forecasters over there might be in for some shock and awe if GFS/Hwrf/Ecmwf/GFDL/CMC are correct on intensity.
gatorcane wrote:Cone moved exactly like I thought it would
GTStorm wrote:CronkPSU wrote:up to 70 mph winds at 11...993 mb
and the cone is right of the 5pm cone...good call guys, i was wrong
landfall at Jacksonville ????? Really ????? Wow.
maxintensity wrote:Interesting the NHC still only expects a cat 1 out of this. I think the forecasters over there might be in for some shock and awe if GFS/Hwrf/Ecmwf/GFDL/CMC are correct on intensity.
GTStorm wrote:CronkPSU wrote:up to 70 mph winds at 11...993 mb
and the cone is right of the 5pm cone...good call guys, i was wrong
landfall at Jacksonville ????? Really ????? Wow.
DESTRUCTION5 wrote:gatorcane wrote:Cone moved exactly like I thought it would
Still landfall in PBC just last point east in Jax rather than Orlando
gatorcane wrote:Cone moved exactly like I thought it would
maxintensity wrote:Interesting the NHC still only expects a cat 1 out of this. I think the forecasters over there might be in for some shock and awe if GFS/Hwrf/Ecmwf/GFDL/CMC are correct on intensity.
cpdaman wrote:I think theres lots of q's to be answerd still. The slowing tonite imo is gonna cause her to spend 2x longer over puerto rico and i think it will be a Weak t.s when it exits the nw side of puerto rico tomm. Seems no one really thinks 4000 foot mountains at about 10 mph movement across the length of p.r will substatially weaken her. Lol. I Wish i could wager a bet on these sort of things
Swimdude wrote:And flirting with Cat 2 at the 96 hour mark. Can't say I'm surprised, but that 90mph wind forecast (bumped up from 85mph at 96hr last advisory) at 96hrs just made me realize h I96hr how serious this might be.
gatorcane wrote:Cone moved exactly like I thought it would
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests