cycloneye wrote:Once again the NE Caribbean is in the track of systems in 2011.
http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/7069 ... w5nlsm.gif
Hey hey, we have another one to monitor carefully

Moderator: S2k Moderators
cycloneye wrote:Once again the NE Caribbean is in the track of systems in 2011.
http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/7069 ... w5nlsm.gif
Hylian Auree wrote:I don't agree with wind shear being the only limiting factor, maybe just the key factor. The region also supports low deep-layer instability, and the environment isn't moist enough to support significant intensification.
Wow, that was quick!
cycloneye wrote:Let's see how the distance gets closer or away from my house as each advisory comes in.
Results for San Juan, Puerto Rico (18.45N, 66W):
The approximate Closest Point of Approach (CPA) is located near 19.0N, 64.0W or about 136.4 miles (219.5 km) from your location. This is corresponding with the 120 hour position of the 5-day forecast (Sunday, September 25 at 11:00PM EDT).
chrisjslucia wrote:Well the models seem to be covering all bases with Ophelia. Anything from the North of Trinidad to the wide open spaces to the North of Antigua. Far too open for us Looshans.
Why such a range? Is the centre yet to be pinned down? Whatever, we need some guidance as to timing, size and general direction - if such questions are answerable at this stage.
Any views on this?
djones65 wrote:Just looking at the BAM models (I am not looking at track because they are not dynamical and will not include the downstream synoptics), but they seem to be closer together than previous runs. I learned a long while ago it is the "poor" mans rough estimate of shear... The closer the BAM Shallow, medium, and deep layers are obviously the less shear. So, at first glance only, in my humble opinion, the upper low forecast to develop north of the Greater Antilles may not exert quite as much shear as previously forecast... Either it will move in tandem perhaps at least for a little while until the upper trof over the Southeast stops it or it may be weaker and/or form farther north than previously forecast... Just a quick observation. Previously, the BAM's were incredibly far apart indicative of tremendous shear now it looks more moderate or slight in my opinion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests