ATL: IRENE - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3681 Postby CrazyC83 » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:52 pm

Kory wrote:As the models continue to shift eastward, I expect the forecast track to be shifted slightly more east. As I called it a few days ago, it is forecasted to turn north, east of Florida.


At this point, there might be a chance it might escape the Southeast completely. How is the ridge supposed to hold up farther north though? Any chance it could get pushed into the Northeast?
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#3682 Postby Vortex » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:52 pm

H+78 approaching SE FL and intensifying...synoptics seem very reasonable.


http://www.nco.ncep.noaa.gov/pmb/nwprod ... p_078l.gif
0 likes   

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3222
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

#3683 Postby chris_fit » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:52 pm

18z NAM 84hrs

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#3684 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:55 pm

and still heading wnw at end of run.. vs NW or NNW at the 12z ..
wait scratch that.. its heading NW

but geezz look at that ridging building in..if the nam when any farther I bet it would turn back wnw ..
Last edited by Aric Dunn on Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#3685 Postby Vortex » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:56 pm

0 likes   

Kory
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Age: 29
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:32 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Re:

#3686 Postby Kory » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:57 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:and still heading wnw at end of run.. vs NW or NNW at the 12z ..

Right now the NAM is an outlier and so is the GFDL. I still expect a SC/NC impact. Not ruling out a complete offshore track as the 12z GFS almost accomplished.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: Re:

#3687 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:58 pm

Kory wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:and still heading wnw at end of run.. vs NW or NNW at the 12z ..

Right now the NAM is an outlier and so is the GFDL. I still expect a SC/NC impact. Not ruling out a complete offshore track as the 12z GFS almost accomplished.


well if the NAM has some sounding data in it.. and it shifted west .. the 18z gfs should as well.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4823
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3688 Postby ronjon » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:58 pm

It would ironic if the NAM and GFDL verified for Irene - one of most vilified tropical cyclone models (other than NOGAPs) versus one of the most highly respected. I don't know if the synoptics might be changing or its just the NAM.
0 likes   

sicktght311
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 11:31 am

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3689 Postby sicktght311 » Mon Aug 22, 2011 3:58 pm

So just to recap what i've seen with the model runs today in the 8 hours i've been at work..........

9am - Runs parallel to florida coast, slamming NC/SC border, then up to long island as a cat 1
12pm - Makes landfall in SoFla, runs directly up the state of florida, then along the eastern seaboard
5pm - Runs over miami, and then maybe the gulf coast, maybe even gulf?

moral of story.........i'll check back tomorrow for what i'm sure will be another 8 hours of model swings :)
0 likes   

User avatar
Vortex
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4644
Age: 53
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2003 9:34 pm
Location: Hilton Head, SC

#3690 Postby Vortex » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:00 pm

other than the obvious why does the GFDL(superior hurricane model) and NAM(excellent with synoptics) force Irene into FL while the others have a sharp curve east???? Maybe someone with abit more backround than myself could share??? Thx
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#3691 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:00 pm

just compared the initialized 500mb heights from the NAM 18z and the 12z gfs and the Nam has the ridging extending farther west.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Scorpion

Re:

#3692 Postby Scorpion » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:01 pm

Vortex wrote:other than the obvious why does the GFDL(superior hurricane model) and NAM(excellent with synoptics) force Irene into FL while the others have a sharp curve east???? Maybe someone with abit more backround than myself could share??? Thx


NAM has always been bad and GFDL has seemed to have some issues. If the new models start to trend more west then they might have some credence though.
0 likes   

Kory
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 200
Age: 29
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:32 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3693 Postby Kory » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:02 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:
Kory wrote:As the models continue to shift eastward, I expect the forecast track to be shifted slightly more east. As I called it a few days ago, it is forecasted to turn north, east of Florida.


At this point, there might be a chance it might escape the Southeast completely. How is the ridge supposed to hold up farther north though? Any chance it could get pushed into the Northeast?

No, I expect Irene to erode the ridge a bit more since she will be pushing category 2/3 strength by Thursday and Friday. I don't see a northeast US direct landfall, but a recurve just offshore of North Carolina is possible, but not likely.
Last edited by Kory on Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

clfenwi
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3331
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 12:54 pm

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3694 Postby clfenwi » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:03 pm

Evil Jeremy wrote:
MWatkins wrote:Found this under the NOUS42 header (my apologies if someone posted this earlier), however I haven't found initialization notes for the 18Z NAM

SENIOR DUTY METEOROLOGIST NWS ADMINISTRATIVE MESSAGE
NWS NCEP CENTRAL OPERATIONS CAMP SPRINGS MD
1340Z MON AUG 22 2011

[EDITED]

THE NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER IS REQUESTING SPECIAL 6-HOURLY UPPER
AIR RELEASES BEGINNING AT 18Z TODAY FROM THE FOLLOWING STATIONS:
KEY WEST, MIAMI, TAMPA, JACKSONVILLE, TALLAHASSEE, SLIDELL,
JACKSON, BIRMINGHAM, PEACHTREE CITY, CHARLESTON, MOREHEAD CITY,
GREENSBORO, NASHVILLE, WILMINGTON, PITTSBURGH, BLACKSBURG,
STERLING AND WALLOPS ISLAND.


What type of data does this add to the models (in general or the 18z in particular) that wasn't there before? Does this mke the 18z models more special than it normally is (as an intermediate run)?


Upper air observations derived from weather balloons usually go into the models only twice a day, 00Z and 12Z. So yes, the 18Z models are getting a little bit more in the way of observations than normal. Looks like most that were requested (if not all) did get into the data dump. Also looks like the first few dropsondes from the G-IV mission made it in as well.
0 likes   

storm4u
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 651
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2004 7:26 am
Location: agawam, ma
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3695 Postby storm4u » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:03 pm

waiting for the gfs to run the nam sucks at tropical weather fwiw
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re:

#3696 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:03 pm

Vortex wrote:other than the obvious why does the GFDL(superior hurricane model) and NAM(excellent with synoptics) force Irene into FL while the others have a sharp curve east???? Maybe someone with abit more backround than myself could share??? Thx


well im not the best with models compared to some. but the GFDL could have a better handle on what Stewart was talking about in the 5am discussion. the GFDL has much better resolution than the GFS and the global models which have a hard time with smaller features.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3697 Postby Aric Dunn » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:05 pm

storm4u wrote:waiting for the gfs to run the nam sucks at tropical weather fwiw


we are not looking at the NAM for track.. the synoptics are a different story. NAM does quite well with that.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: Re:

#3698 Postby otowntiger » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:06 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
Kory wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:and still heading wnw at end of run.. vs NW or NNW at the 12z ..

Right now the NAM is an outlier and so is the GFDL. I still expect a SC/NC impact. Not ruling out a complete offshore track as the 12z GFS almost accomplished.


well if the NAM has some sounding data in it.. and it shifted west .. the 18z gfs should as well.
But why does the NHC seem to have increasing confidence in model agreement that will take the storm up the current forecasted track? I keep hearing about this model and that model shifting west but the NHC's track is holding steady and/or shifting east along with the 'model concensus'.
0 likes   

User avatar
CourierPR
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1335
Age: 71
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida

Re: ATL: IRENE - Models

#3699 Postby CourierPR » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:06 pm

Kory wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:
Kory wrote:As the models continue to shift eastward, I expect the forecast track to be shifted slightly more east. As I called it a few days ago, it is forecasted to turn north, east of Florida.


At this point, there might be a chance it might escape the Southeast completely. How is the ridge supposed to hold up farther north though? Any chance it could get pushed into the Northeast?

No, I expect Irene to erode the ridge a bit more since she will be pushing category 2/3 strength by Thursday and Friday. I don't see a northeast US direct landfall, but a recurve just offshore of North Carolina is possible, but not likely.



She might also pump up the ridge. I think it's too soon to be making sweeping statements with such certainty.
0 likes   

User avatar
ronjon
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4823
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 5:17 pm
Location: Hernando Beach, FL

Re:

#3700 Postby ronjon » Mon Aug 22, 2011 4:07 pm

Vortex wrote:other than the obvious why does the GFDL(superior hurricane model) and NAM(excellent with synoptics) force Irene into FL while the others have a sharp curve east???? Maybe someone with abit more backround than myself could share??? Thx


Yeah the NAM has stronger 500 mb ridging over the western Atlantic which is similar to the GFDL. The NAM is a mesoscale model and the GFDL is very high in resolution - are they seeing something the globals can't?
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests