ATL: IRENE - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
maryellen40
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 20
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 2:21 pm
Location: Michigan

#7921 Postby maryellen40 » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:02 pm

wow because the media hyped this one up, when one comes that does not weaken, people will not take it seriously.
0 likes   

Hogweed

Re: ATL: IRENE - Hurricane - Discussion

#7922 Postby Hogweed » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:02 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:down to 100 MPH now, weakening trend continues.


Its Destructive storm surge/wave rating has not decreased. Still at 5.1 (on a scale of 0-6) per latest http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Storm_page ... /wind.html
Last edited by Hogweed on Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: Re:

#7923 Postby ConvergenceZone » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:03 pm

psyclone wrote:
Texashawk wrote:I don't understand. Pressure falls, storm looks like a$$.
Pressure rises, storm looks like Tip.
:roll:

well here's an analogy that may demonstrate and perhaps a pro can chime and validate this or tell me i'm nuts. As we all know Irene is a big storm, a massive atmospheric pit. as such she is slower to react to factors which should alter her intensity. i think of hydrology here. a small stream is immediately reactive to a heavy rain event whereas a big river is slow to react (think of the lower mississippi this spring which crested weeks after the heavy rain event). as far as hurricanes go irene would be the slow reacting big river and is taking longer to react to changes which we would ordinarily expect to impact the hurricane quicker.



Well, one thing I learned last night is that winds don't always follow pressure drops. Remember last night when the pressure dropped and many were saying that the winds would follow? I think that has been disproven... It doesn't always happen that way...
0 likes   

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

#7924 Postby Stormcenter » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:03 pm

Looks like Irene make have taken a vitamin pill. New convection
building around the center.


http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/goes/flt/t2/flash-avn.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Tstormwatcher
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3086
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 7:31 pm
Location: New Bern, NC

Re: Re:

#7925 Postby Tstormwatcher » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:03 pm

Aja wrote:
Tstormwatcher wrote:
Aja wrote:Question: Is Weather Channel correct with South Carolina expecting 22 ft of storm surge?


When did you hear that?

Just now on the weather channel.


NHC is only predicting a 3 to 6 foot surge along the SC coast. Not sure where TWC got their info.
0 likes   

User avatar
micktooth
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 3:47 pm
Location: PreK:New Orleans,PostK:Colorado

Re:

#7926 Postby micktooth » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:04 pm

maryellen40 wrote:wow because the media hyped this one up, when one comes that does not weaken, people will not take it seriously.


This is not hyped up, people still need to take this storm very seriously. Wind speed is not the only indicator of potential damage.

The above post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

HugoCameandLeft
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 6:42 am
Location: Charleston, SC

Re:

#7927 Postby HugoCameandLeft » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:04 pm

Aja wrote:Question: Is Weather Channel correct with South Carolina expecting 22 ft of storm surge? If so, Why is the west side of this storm expecting more than the east?

I am a journalist, not a meteorologist.


If I recall correctly, Hugo's maximum surge in Awendaw was 22 feet. I find it hard to believe we could have anything close to that as far away as we are, and given the strength.
0 likes   

JTD
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1558
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 6:35 pm

#7928 Postby JTD » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:04 pm

Is the NHC using 70% or 80% of flight level winds when determining surface winds?
0 likes   

seahawkjd
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 4:12 pm
Location: Morehead City, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRENE - Hurricane - Discussion

#7929 Postby seahawkjd » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:05 pm

What is the conversion rate of flight level winds to the surface? Latest vdm found 105 kt (120 mph) winds as the peak in the southeast quadrant.
0 likes   
Gloria, Hugo, Emily, Bertha, Bonnie, Dennis (twice), Fran, Floyd, Isabel, Irene, Arthur, Matthew, Florence, Dorian (and many tropical storms and nor'easters).

Chris_in_Tampa
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5075
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:06 pm
Location: Tampa, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRENE - Recon

#7930 Postby Chris_in_Tampa » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:07 pm

Wide View, with 11AM EDT and 5AM EDT tracks.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthernBreeze
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 284
Age: 68
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 4:54 pm
Location: SC/NC line- on the SC Coast

Re: Re:

#7931 Postby SouthernBreeze » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:08 pm

Aja wrote:
krisj wrote:
Aja wrote:Question: Is Weather Channel correct with South Carolina expecting 22 ft of storm surge?

That would have to be my the NC/SC border, right? Not Charleston. We had one windy band here this morning and not much since.

Nope! They said Edisto Beach

I just got home from boarding up windows on a little house I have on the waterway under a bunch of huge oaks, and a friend of mine in New Bern left me a voice mail msg that he heard the news that Myrtle Bch was having 20 ft waves too -- I don't think that's right - trying to get a hold of him now....
0 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

#7932 Postby Raebie » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:08 pm

Uh, anyone else concerned about that recent westerly movement?
0 likes   

User avatar
Portastorm
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 9914
Age: 63
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRENE - Hurricane - Discussion

#7933 Postby Portastorm » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:08 pm

seahawkjd wrote:What is the conversion rate of flight level winds to the surface? Latest vdm found 105 kt (120 mph) winds as the peak in the southeast quadrant.


I have always heard to multiply the flight level wind by 90% (.9) ... then multiply that figure by 1.15 to convert it from knots to mph.

So in this case ... 108 mph?
0 likes   
Any forecasts under my name are to be taken with a grain of salt. Get your best forecasts from the National Weather Service and National Hurricane Center.

User avatar
webke
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 290
Age: 70
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 12:39 pm
Location: North Myrtle Beach SC

Re:

#7934 Postby webke » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:09 pm

Raebie wrote:Uh, anyone else concerned about that recent westerly movement?

Yes
0 likes   

User avatar
deltadog03
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3580
Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 6:16 pm
Location: Macon, GA

Re:

#7935 Postby deltadog03 » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:09 pm

Raebie wrote:Uh, anyone else concerned about that recent westerly movement?



A NNW movement yes.....She is gonna have to turn soon...but, I don't see it right now
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: Re:

#7936 Postby ozonepete » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:09 pm

HugoCameandLeft wrote:
Aja wrote:Question: Is Weather Channel correct with South Carolina expecting 22 ft of storm surge? If so, Why is the west side of this storm expecting more than the east?

I am a journalist, not a meteorologist.


If I recall correctly, Hugo's maximum surge in Awendaw was 22 feet. I find it hard to believe we could have anything close to that as far away as we are, and given the strength.


Aja, I'm pretty sure they said 22ft waves, as someone else just said here. There is no way S.C. is getting a 22 foot surge.
0 likes   

User avatar
Aja
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 42
Age: 61
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:21 pm
Location: Charleston, SC
Contact:

Re:

#7937 Postby Aja » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:10 pm

maryellen40 wrote:wow because the media hyped this one up, when one comes that does not weaken, people will not take it seriously.

Trust me when I say, "This storm is going to teach a lesson that will have all listening to the next one!" Just because she has weakened, make no mistake, she is going to be just as horrific as her predecessors and hopefully not on a scale of Katrina flooding.
Media hyped this storm prematurely in SC too far in advance. Over a week ago media used this in SC to create panic that now has many I know on up the East Coast ignoring media where the attention needs to take seriously. That is the danger of crying wolf too soon!

I am a journalist, not a meteorologist.
Last edited by Aja on Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: Re:

#7938 Postby psyclone » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:11 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:
psyclone wrote:
Texashawk wrote:I don't understand. Pressure falls, storm looks like a$$.
Pressure rises, storm looks like Tip.
:roll:

well here's an analogy that may demonstrate and perhaps a pro can chime and validate this or tell me i'm nuts. As we all know Irene is a big storm, a massive atmospheric pit. as such she is slower to react to factors which should alter her intensity. i think of hydrology here. a small stream is immediately reactive to a heavy rain event whereas a big river is slow to react (think of the lower mississippi this spring which crested weeks after the heavy rain event). as far as hurricanes go irene would be the slow reacting big river and is taking longer to react to changes which we would ordinarily expect to impact the hurricane quicker.

Well, one thing I learned last night is that winds don't always follow pressure drops. Remember last night when the pressure dropped and many were saying that the winds would follow? I think that has been disproven... It doesn't always happen that way...

if anything that validates the illustration. there's no way a medium or small hurricane wouldn't have reacted to that sort of pressure drop. but Irene is so big that pressure drop wasn't big or sustained enough to generate a response
0 likes   

User avatar
Jevo
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1729
Age: 47
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 8:45 pm
Location: The Flemish Cap
Contact:

#7939 Postby Jevo » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:13 pm

12Z GFDL +24

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

12z GFDL +36

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
0 likes   
Disclaimer: 50% of the time I have no clue of what I am talking about. Chances are I am taking a less than educated guess that sounds good because 10 years ago I stole Mike Watkins book 'The Hurricane and its Impact'. For official information please direct yourself to the NHC and their cadre of weather geniuses.

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4769
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: IRENE - Hurricane - Discussion

#7940 Postby psyclone » Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:13 pm

DCal2K wrote:Seems like NYC dodged a big bullet. Good thing too.

that might be a tad premature.
0 likes   


Return to “2011”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests