Aric Dunn wrote:very likely to a td tomorrow at some point. if not then sunday morning.
You think that fast?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Aric Dunn wrote:very likely to a td tomorrow at some point. if not then sunday morning.
cycloneye wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:very likely to a td tomorrow at some point. if not then sunday morning.
You think that fast?
Caribwxgirl wrote:Anyone gonna answer my question? Should we maybe be focusing on the front portion rather than the back?
Riptide wrote:Caribwxgirl wrote:Anyone gonna answer my question? Should we maybe be focusing on the front portion rather than the back?
That convection is just ITCZ(Inter-tropical convergence zone) activity; nothing that could devlope before 94L.
Aric Dunn wrote:very likely to a td tomorrow at some point. if not then sunday morning.
KWT wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:very likely to a td tomorrow at some point. if not then sunday morning.
Depends on whether the low level flow picks up pace, its already going at a decent clip, could end up suffering like other systems in this area have.
If it doesn't, conditions are good barring the structural issues so you may not be far off the mark, I think Sunday eveing into Monday myself.
Certainly needs very close watching though!
Aric Dunn wrote:cycloneye wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:very likely to a td tomorrow at some point. if not then sunday morning.
You think that fast?
yes. pretty sure we will wake up to a system well on its way. ( already evidence it is.)
Hurricane Alexis wrote:Can Andrew be used as a analog in this case?
AJC3 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:cycloneye wrote:
You think that fast?
yes. pretty sure we will wake up to a system well on its way. ( already evidence it is.)
Tomorrow is too fast, Aric. The wave is fully involved with the ITCZ right now (see ASCAT), and the convection is largely on the front flank of the wave axis, which is a good sign of this being the case. Separation is going to take a couple days. I'd say Sunday would be the earliest shot, but it may take a little longer.
Aric Dunn wrote:AJC3 wrote: Tomorrow is too fast, Aric. The wave is fully involved with the ITCZ right now (see ASCAT), and the convection is largely on the front flank of the wave axis, which is a good sign of this being the case. Separation is going to take a couple days. I'd say Sunday would be the earliest shot, but it may take a little longer.
I do agree its still involved with the ITCZ. it does not have to take days to break off. it is as you know dependent of deep convection we can get a system to break away from the itcz in much shorter time given the right conditions.
AJC3 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:AJC3 wrote: Tomorrow is too fast, Aric. The wave is fully involved with the ITCZ right now (see ASCAT), and the convection is largely on the front flank of the wave axis, which is a good sign of this being the case. Separation is going to take a couple days. I'd say Sunday would be the earliest shot, but it may take a little longer.
I do agree its still involved with the ITCZ. it does not have to take days to break off. it is as you know dependent of deep convection we can get a system to break away from the itcz in much shorter time given the right conditions.
Right, and the convection is going to have to become more robust near the vort center closer to the cusp of the wave axis, away from the ITCZ. Right now that's not the case. Give it a few days.
Blown Away wrote:Holy Crud! Just casually running the 18z GFS after being away from the computer and thinking a little farther west and WOW!
Aric Dunn wrote: exactly the convection has weakened today as developing systems typically do. tonight will help us figure things out.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests