wxman57 wrote:Looks like recon is still struggling to find any TS winds at the surface.
So you think it's weakening?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:Looks like recon is still struggling to find any TS winds at the surface.
wxman57 wrote:
Your point? I didn't see any evidence of such wind in the recon reports.The plane barely found TS wind at FL, and lacking convection to the NE it isnn't likely that the FL winds would translate well to the surface. SFMR supported that - 25-30 kt surface wind.
shortwave wrote:000130 1517N 06150W 6948 03167 9971 +102 /// 160007 007 025 002 01
Is that 997 pressure, what altitude?
RL3AO wrote:shortwave wrote:000130 1517N 06150W 6948 03167 9971 +102 /// 160007 007 025 002 01
Is that 997 pressure, what altitude?
Those extrapolated pressure readings from the NOAA plane should be ignored IMO. Use the dropsondes. They're always too low on the pressure.
Shuriken wrote:Big O wrote:Big O wrote:A well-respected met on another board posted the following:
"My take is that if the Euro indeed has the mid-level ridging properly modeled out in time, then solutions further west than even what the Euro (and every other model out there) have currently, are NOT off the table.....It's not like we have a massively digging trough that turns Isaac. And with the ongoing drought feeding back into the seasonal propensity to hold strongly onto ridging across the deep south, I wouldn't overlook the potential of Isaac to head back westward, once/if he reaches the GOM."
Bottom line is that track is not set in stone. While I believe the track into the eastern GOM is the most likely to verify, one cannot discount the possibility of a further west option at this time.
Another met on the other board seems to agree. Here is his/her reply post:
"Definitely agreed with this. If Issac can stay far enough south, it might even feel the effects of the "death ridge" near the southern Plains, and turn much more westerly towards Texas, even. The fact that all the data seems to stall Issac once it hits land is indicative of the lack of a steering flow. There is a weak trough that enters the midwest, which combined with a potential weakness in the Atlantic ridge that Issac could run into once it hits the Gulf, that could turn him northward towards the western Florida Panhandle. But if that is not enough, Issac could bend well back to the west, and hopefully relieve some drought conditions in the southern Plains.
I can see a Track "A" scenario with Issac approaching the western FLA Panhandle area, and a track "B" scenario of it bending much further west. Not sure I see an in-between scenario at this time."
Presented for your amusement and/or utter horror, a COMPLETELY UNOFFICIAL EXERCISE IN WHAT-IF:
"Scenario B" (Intensity? ...use your lurid imagination.)
http://img838.imageshack.us/img838/9357/huur.gif[/]
cycloneye wrote:caribepr wrote:<---hoping all the islands affected fare well. I'm in California right now and home seems a far way away, as emails tell me the first bands are coming on now.
Hi my friend.Let's hope that nothing serious occurs in the islands and down the road.
Aric Dunn wrote:The center is reforming again. recon having issues finding a good center fix. looks to be now well south of earlier fixes.
hurricanes1234 wrote:Where's the best track update?
cycloneye wrote:hurricanes1234 wrote:Where's the best track update?
Here is the 00z Best Track.
AL, 09, 2012082300, , BEST, 0, 158N, 622W, 40, 1004, TS
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests