wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
So if this happens, weaker Ernie in the long term?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
GCANE wrote:Meteorcane wrote:Question very quick about the Hot Towers... Hot Towers are very tall cumulonimbus clouds correct? Are they important in tropical cyclone development because they show substantial heating via condensation of the mid-upper troposphere?
Right on the money
wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
wxman57 wrote:I noticed that the 00Z runs shifted considerably west from earlier runs for days 4-7. Only the GFDL is now indicating a track across eastern Cuba into the eastern Gulf. All others "aim" at the area from the upper TX coast south to Mexico. Closer to my track, so I like it.
TwisterFanatic wrote:wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
Only about 9 more shifts until we learn the solution.
HurricaneAndrew92 wrote:wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
So if this happens, weaker Ernie in the long term?
HurricaneAndrew92 wrote:wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
So if this happens, weaker Ernie in the long term?
wxman57 wrote:I noticed that the 00Z runs shifted considerably west from earlier runs for days 4-7. Only the GFDL is now indicating a track across eastern Cuba into the eastern Gulf. All others "aim" at the area from the upper TX coast south to Mexico. Closer to my track, so I like it.
mcheer23 wrote:wxman57 wrote:I noticed that the 00Z runs shifted considerably west from earlier runs for days 4-7. Only the GFDL is now indicating a track across eastern Cuba into the eastern Gulf. All others "aim" at the area from the upper TX coast south to Mexico. Closer to my track, so I like it.
Do you favor a texas track or mexico?
TwisterFanatic wrote:wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
Only about 9 more shifts until we learn the solution.
bella_may wrote:I still don't understand why these models are keeping this storm so weak. They have to be seeing something we're not. Perhaps there's some dry air ernesto is going to run into?
wxman57 wrote:00Z model guidance shifted well to the west, no more turn northward to the NE Gulf, except for the wacky GFDL. All other tracks point at upper TX coast or south to MX.
wxman57 wrote:I don't think we'll have to wait 8-10 days. As fast as it's moving it could reach the Yucatan on Tuesday and be in the SW Gulf/BoC earlier on Wed.
AJC3 wrote:Meteorcane wrote:Question very quick about the Hot Towers... Hot Towers are very tall cumulonimbus clouds correct? Are they important in tropical cyclone development because they show substantial heating via condensation of the mid-upper troposphere?
If you google "vortical hot towers" you will come across dozens of references to the role VHT's play in TC-genesis. In essense, VHT theory suggests on the storm scale, convectively generated low level positive PV anomalies are the primary mechanism in spinning up a TC. In recent years, this theory has gained favor over the CISK theory of TC-genesis, which is what I was taught in college.
The Role of “Vortical” Hot Towers in the Formation of Tropical Cyclone Diana (1984)
Eric A. Hendricks and Michael T. Montgomery
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
Christopher A. Davis
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
At near-cloud-resolving scales, these vortical hot towers are the preferred mode of convection. They are demonstrated to be the most important influence to the formation of the tropical storm via a two-stage evolutionary process: (i) preconditioning of the local environment via diabatic production of multiple small-scale lower-tropospheric cyclonic potential vorticity (PV) anomalies, and (ii) multiple mergers and axisymmetrization of these low-level PV anomalies. The local warm-core formation and tangential momentum spinup are shown to be dominated by the organizational process of the diabatically generated PV anomalies; the former process being accomplished by the strong vertical vorticity in the hot tower cores, which effectively traps the latent heat from moist convection. In addition to the organizational process of the PV anomalies, the cyclogenesis is enhanced by the aggregate diabatic heating associated with the vortical hot towers, which produces a net influx of low-level mean angular momentum throughout the genesis.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests