ATL: ISAAC - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Shuriken

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1961 Postby Shuriken » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:12 am

SouthFloridawx wrote:Here's a really awesome Water Vapor Loop and a cool Website @ PSU.

http://www.meteo.psu.edu/~gadomski/SAT_ATL/atlanimwv.html

I see you, and raise you: http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~ovens/ ... nhanced+24

Mwahahahahah....

- - - -

Personal forecast 'til morning: The CDO-ish feature will appear to go stationary and warm, maybe even nearly dying off -- but this is only temporary as the various coalescing centers swirl around a common rotational axis at about 15N. (All the board fan-peeps will groan as their big proto-hurricane appears to fizzle once again.) About 9am EST tomorrow, the surface and mid-level centers complete stacking, and Isaac begins an uninterrupted, and at times rapid, intensification trend.
0 likes   

Shuriken

#1962 Postby Shuriken » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:44 am

ZCZC MIATCPAT4 ALL
TTAA00 KNHC DDHHMM

BULLETIN
TROPICAL STORM ISAAC INTERMEDIATE ADVISORY NUMBER 8A
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL AL092012
200 AM AST THU AUG 23 2012

...RECONNAISSANCE AIRCRAFT FINDS THE CENTER OF ISAAC IS REFORMING
FARTHER SOUTH...


SUMMARY OF 200 AM AST...0600 UTC...INFORMATION
----------------------------------------------
LOCATION...15.5N 63.5W
ABOUT 265 MI...425 KM SE OF SAN JUAN PUERTO RICO
MAXIMUM SUSTAINED WINDS...45 MPH...75 KM/H
PRESENT MOVEMENT...W OR 260 DEGREES AT 20 MPH...32 KM/H
MINIMUM CENTRAL PRESSURE...1003 MB...29.62 INCHES
0 likes   

ncweatherwizard
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1243
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 9:45 am
Location: Ft. Collins, CO

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1963 Postby ncweatherwizard » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:50 am

I probably ought not be saying much since I've only looked at some data for only 10 minutes or so. My experience though tells me that not too many storms (granted there will be counter-examples; e.g. 2006 Ernesto) that cross mountainous terrain in the way that the current NHC projection shows actually continue northwest in the manner that the guidance is showing unless a huge gap in ridging is present. Currently, there's weak ridging that extends into the eastern GOM, and mid-level ridging is in place over the southern US. If the center were to move over Haiti or Cuba, there would be a fair chance that the LLC and MLC would become decoupled. Then the surface low would have to redevelop, and it would get steered by the low-level flow. If there's even weak ridging in place, that flow would probably favor a more westerly motion than northerly.

Besides, if the thing keeps flying along in the short-term, then we might be focusing on the left side of the guidance envelope anyway. Either way, if I had to bet, I wouldn't put my money on even close to a FL peninsula strike. I've been known to lose bets before. :wink:

Scott
0 likes   

User avatar
Texashawk
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 579
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:50 am
Location: Missouri City, TX (Houston)

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1964 Postby Texashawk » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:56 am

I swear, every tropical system I've seen this year, especially in the Caribbean, has gone just like this....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sp3YfmL9RwU

:lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1965 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:58 am

the reformation delays it arrival into the GOM if that is where it ends up.....still moving west at a fast clip and the steering flow is

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/d ... oom=&time=
0 likes   

Shuriken

#1966 Postby Shuriken » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:06 am

In the recon thread, plane's found a potential center at 14.4N -- over a degree south of the last official fix.

-- It appears the old mid-level low is burrowing down to the surface.

viewtopic.php?f=59&t=113392&start=320

(Linking AJC3's pic)

Image
0 likes   

Caribwxgirl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 287
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:25 pm
Location: Budapest, Hungary (from Kingston, Jamaica)

#1967 Postby Caribwxgirl » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:06 am

If the the centre has reformed further south shouldn't the NHC have adjusted the track even a tad south? I mean i'mnot questioning them saying it will move wnw eventually but that move moment should start from further dont you think? How can the track be exactly the same with such a center shift? I'm confused someone please explain thanks :oops:
Last edited by Caribwxgirl on Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:07 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institutions or storm2k.org. For official information refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1968 Postby Cyclenall » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:07 am

Shuriken wrote:Personal forecast 'til morning: The CDO-ish feature will appear to go stationary and warm, maybe even nearly dying off -- but this is only temporary as the various coalescing centers swirl around a common rotational axis at about 15N. (All the board fan-peeps will groan as their big proto-hurricane appears to fizzle once again.) About 9am EST tomorrow, the surface and mid-level centers complete stacking, and Isaac begins an uninterrupted, and at times rapid, intensification trend.

Do you mean 9:00 am today (August 23) or literally tomorrow (August 24)? Sometimes people don't remember we're on a new day once it gets late. I would take this seriously as you were spot on with the convection fading and pulsing back up at a certain time a couple days ago, it was very accurate.

Caribwxgirl wrote:If the the centre has reformed further south shouldn't the NHC have adjusted the track even a tad south? I mean i'mnot questioning them saying it will move wnw eventually but that move moment should start from further dont you think? How can the track be exactly the same with such a center shift? I'm confused someone please explain thanks :oops:

The NHC doesn't do track adjustments during intermittent advisories so even if the center was 200 miles south, they wouldn't touch it unless a special package came out. They should do something at 5:00 am EDT.
Last edited by Cyclenall on Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1969 Postby GeneratorPower » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:09 am

I'm sure this has been mentioned but I haven't read all 99 pages. The thing that strikes me about this is how freaking huge this system is. It's big. It's taking a long time to spin up, partly because of that. But man, this could be a serious problem for someone given it's size and the fact that entry into the Gulf of Mexico is pretty much assured.
0 likes   

Shuriken

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1970 Postby Shuriken » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:11 am

ncweatherwizard wrote:I probably ought not be saying much since I've only looked at some data for only 10 minutes or so. My experience though tells me that not too many storms (granted there will be counter-examples; e.g. 2006 Ernesto) that cross mountainous terrain in the way that the current NHC projection shows actually continue northwest in the manner that the guidance is showing unless a huge gap in ridging is present. Currently, there's weak ridging that extends into the eastern GOM, and mid-level ridging is in place over the southern US. If the center were to move over Haiti or Cuba, there would be a fair chance that the LLC and MLC would become decoupled. Then the surface low would have to redevelop, and it would get steered by the low-level flow. If there's even weak ridging in place, that flow would probably favor a more westerly motion than northerly.

Besides, if the thing keeps flying along in the short-term, then we might be focusing on the left side of the guidance envelope anyway. Either way, if I had to bet, I wouldn't put my money on even close to a FL peninsula strike. I've been known to lose bets before. :wink:

Scott
Agreed -- exactly happened to Gustov, which was supposed to run up over Haiti into Florida at one point, instead it decoupled over Haiti with the surface low moving southwest around Jamaica, with the eventual track being hundreds of miles farther west.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1971 Postby ROCK » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:11 am

they wont have this data in the 06Z run BTW
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

#1972 Postby Hammy » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:11 am

moving SSW or so it looks like based on wind plots relative to the last fix--I'm thinking its rotating around whats left of the old center or doing a loop of some sort before resuming a W-WNW motion
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Caribwxgirl
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 287
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 7:25 pm
Location: Budapest, Hungary (from Kingston, Jamaica)

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1973 Postby Caribwxgirl » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:15 am

Cyclenall wrote:
Shuriken wrote:Personal forecast 'til morning: The CDO-ish feature will appear to go stationary and warm, maybe even nearly dying off -- but this is only temporary as the various coalescing centers swirl around a common rotational axis at about 15N. (All the board fan-peeps will groan as their big proto-hurricane appears to fizzle once again.) About 9am EST tomorrow, the surface and mid-level centers complete stacking, and Isaac begins an uninterrupted, and at times rapid, intensification trend.

Do you mean 9:00 am today (August 23) or literally tomorrow (August 24)? Sometimes people don't remember we're on a new day once it gets late. I would take this seriously as you were spot on with the convection fading and pulsing back up at a certain time a couple days ago, it was very accurate.

Caribwxgirl wrote:If the the centre has reformed further south shouldn't the NHC have adjusted the track even a tad south? I mean i'mnot questioning them saying it will move wnw eventually but that move moment should start from further dont you think? How can the track be exactly the same with such a center shift? I'm confused someone please explain thanks :oops:

The NHC doesn't do track adjustments during intermittent advisories so even if the center was 200 miles south, they wouldn't touch it unless a special package came out. They should do something at 5:00 am EDT.


Ok thanks I was really confused.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institutions or storm2k.org. For official information refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Shuriken

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1974 Postby Shuriken » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:30 am

Cyclenall wrote:
Shuriken wrote:Personal forecast 'til morning: The CDO-ish feature will appear to go stationary and warm, maybe even nearly dying off -- but this is only temporary as the various coalescing centers swirl around a common rotational axis at about 15N. (All the board fan-peeps will groan as their big proto-hurricane appears to fizzle once again.) About 9am EST tomorrow, the surface and mid-level centers complete stacking, and Isaac begins an uninterrupted, and at times rapid, intensification trend.

Do you mean 9:00 am today (August 23) or literally tomorrow (August 24)? Sometimes people don't remember were on a new day once it gets late. I would take this seriously as you were spot on with the convection fading and pulsing back up at a certain time a couple days ago, it was very accurate.
(Thanks.)

Today the 23rd.

(It's puking right on cue, I see.)

...you may be wondering how I came up with that forecast -- answer: my elephantine memory remembers another storm of similar size and strength at-that-point do exactly the same thing in the same vicinity -- Hurricane Gilbert (which also busted every model run for a week straight predicting recurvature...of course they're a lot better these days, but interesting nonetheless).

Image
0 likes   

Shuriken

#1975 Postby Shuriken » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:41 am

Recon center-fix is due west of Martinique, or about 14.7ish N.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Cyclenall
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 10:01 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1976 Postby Cyclenall » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:56 am

Shuriken wrote:About 9am EST tomorrow, the surface and mid-level centers complete stacking, and Isaac begins an uninterrupted, and at times rapid, intensification trend.

Fits with this:

SHIPS 06z RI Index wrote:Prob of RI for 25 kt RI threshold= 55% is 4.3 times the sample mean(12.8%)
Prob of RI for 30 kt RI threshold= 44% is 5.2 times the sample mean( 8.4%)
Prob of RI for 35 kt RI threshold= 32% is 6.3 times the sample mean( 5.0%)
Prob of RI for 40 kt RI threshold= 17% is 5.1 times the sample mean( 3.4%)


Is there a reason recon hasn't found any TS-force winds yet? Is it in the convection where recon hasn't gone yet or something?
0 likes   

User avatar
southerngale
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 27418
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 1:27 am
Location: Southeast Texas (Beaumont area)

Re: ATL: ISAAC - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1977 Postby southerngale » Thu Aug 23, 2012 2:56 am

With the latest recon fix at 14.7N, Isaac is further south than it was when it was classified as a TD. So the motion for the past 3 days has been a little south of west.
0 likes   
Please support Storm2k by making a donation today. It is greatly appreciated! Click here: Image

Image my Cowboys Image my RocketsImage my Astros

User avatar
meriland23
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1239
Age: 37
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 9:29 pm

#1978 Postby meriland23 » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:03 am

my big question is how will this sudden south motion effect the path
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re:

#1979 Postby USTropics » Thu Aug 23, 2012 3:18 am

meriland23 wrote:my big question is how will this sudden south motion effect the path


Still a lot of variables to be determined (like if/when Isaac's inner core becomes situated) but if it stays weak and follows the low level steering (i.e. the Euro solution) a track further west is likely. If Shuriken is correct, which seems plausible, and this begins to intensify later this morning at the current center relocation we're looking at less land interaction initially and Isaac would likely feel the weakness in the ridge more effectively, with a path similar to the NHC occurring. I haven't looked at JB's recent thoughts but I'm assuming he has a deepening system also being influenced more by the weakness and heading towards the EC of Florida.
0 likes   

Shuriken

Re: Re:

#1980 Postby Shuriken » Thu Aug 23, 2012 4:05 am

USTropics wrote:
meriland23 wrote:my big question is how will this sudden south motion effect the path
Still a lot of variables to be determined (like if/when Isaac's inner core becomes situated) but if it stays weak and follows the low level steering (i.e. the Euro solution) a track further west is likely. If Shuriken is correct, which seems plausible, and this begins to intensify later this morning at the current center relocation we're looking at less land interaction initially and Isaac would likely feel the weakness in the ridge more effectively, with a path similar to the NHC occurring. I haven't looked at JB's recent thoughts but I'm assuming he has a deepening system also being influenced more by the weakness and heading towards the EC of Florida.
I wouldn't be so quick to draw that conclusion.

A track which misses Haiti and eastern Cuba will -- better odds than not this time of season should it wander into the northwestern Caribbean heat-sink -- result in a cat-4 or -5 system (and they usually get that way after a relatively short period of not-forecast explosive intensification) easily capable of modifying its environment in ways the models can't parse from this far out. Storms of that intensity also respond to mean steering different from weaker systems.
0 likes   


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests