jlauderdal wrote:i grabbed those images for you will try sending via PM
Thanks! Yup, definitely appears to be "Big Drops". Even the HCA algorithm painted a few of them on the leading edge. Although its few pixels of hail were amusing - very much doubt that.
Ixolib wrote:With all the talk about the GFS track (eastward) vs. NHC track (westward), I'm wondering if anyone recalls a time when the NHC flip-flopped it's forecast track by 180 degrees? Seems to me that in the last several years, the NHC track has generally
always come to fruition within a few miles, but never have I seen a 180 degree shift. Well, maybe Betsy in '65 and Elena in '85, but those were both eons ago, technologically speaking.
This from the NHC:
...EVEN THOUGH THE DETERMINISTIC GFS SHOWS AN EASTWARD TRACK...MORE THAN HALF OF THE GFS ENSEMBLE MEMBERS ARE IN AGREEMENT WITH THE WESTWARD-MOVING MODELS...MAKING THE WESTWARD SCENARIO SEEM MORE LIKELY...
Continuity is an extremely strong constraint on the NHC forecast, so they would be very loath to make dramatic changes. Although walking on a strong discontinuity between two strongly opposed scenarios like this would make a really fascinating exercise in that constraint if they felt the need to change.
Air Force Met wrote:One thing is for sure...Debby is spitting out a mid level vort center. It's up near 27/28 and 85 and on it's way to Florida. We should see a new re-fire of convection near the center.
And with it hang the hopes (or at least many of them) for GFS verification. Am watching with great interest.