deltadog03 wrote:Looks like I might need an ARK before all said and done...
In Wyoming?
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Aric Dunn wrote:SeminoleWind wrote:BigB0882 wrote:Heading NNE after landfall but very slowly? Timing is going to be so key on this thing.
Question, could it start its NNE or NE turn before landfall?
yes if it takes its time getting out of the carribean.
Aric Dunn wrote:SeminoleWind wrote:BigB0882 wrote:Heading NNE after landfall but very slowly? Timing is going to be so key on this thing.
Question, could it start its NNE or NE turn before landfall?
yes if it takes its time getting out of the carribean.
southerngale wrote:deltadog03 wrote:Looks like I might need an ARK before all said and done...
In Wyoming?
Wx_Warrior wrote:Someone brought this to my attention via twitter.
Any reason why the GFS initialized this run at 1001mb, where as it's 990mb?
Man oh man.
deltadog03 wrote:Ok, FIXED.....ooops...thanks for the heads up!
BigB0882 wrote:Wx_Warrior wrote:Someone brought this to my attention via twitter.
Any reason why the GFS initialized this run at 1001mb, where as it's 990mb?
Man oh man.
That's pretty off if true. Not sure what it means, garbage in garbage out (doubtful, the run is so close to the others) or is it not enough of a difference?
GFS doesn't really have the capability to resolve the storm's inner core, so its lowest isobar is bound to be higher than the storm's min pressure. It isn't likely to have any significant effect on the track. The inability to resolve the inner core may result in problems with the intensity, but that's fairly well known and I'm assuming not what you're asking about.Wx_Warrior wrote:Someone brought this to my attention via twitter.
Any reason why the GFS initialized this run at 1001mb, where as it's 990mb?
Man oh man.
SunnyThoughts wrote:You know, I"ve been wondering the past few model runs. ON the graphics, when it shows landfall (the 2nd landfall on norther gulf coast) the center of the storm seems to be so wide on the graphics, that it covers a large amount of real estate. Does that mean its possible that the center or cdo or wall of convection..is so wide that it would result in the graphics depicting it that way? How can you tell where it makes landfall...when the center stretches from mobile bay...to Destin Fla as depicted in one of those graphics resolution?
SapphireSea wrote:SunnyThoughts wrote:You know, I"ve been wondering the past few model runs. ON the graphics, when it shows landfall (the 2nd landfall on norther gulf coast) the center of the storm seems to be so wide on the graphics, that it covers a large amount of real estate. Does that mean its possible that the center or cdo or wall of convection..is so wide that it would result in the graphics depicting it that way? How can you tell where it makes landfall...when the center stretches from mobile bay...to Destin Fla as depicted in one of those graphics resolution?
It's neigh impossible with the resolutions the global models run at. You would have to look for HWRF high-res for something that might resolve the center and get you a 20 mile point. Basically that last isobar can be interpreted as a cone where, anywhere in that area the center might be for the run. It's like trying to figure out which of the 'holes' of a spinning golf ball will impact the ground at a certain time. With enough mathematics you can make a guess. Good luck getting it right. Luckily hurricane centers are far bigger than a groove on a golf ball.
SunnyThoughts wrote:SapphireSea wrote:SunnyThoughts wrote:You know, I"ve been wondering the past few model runs. ON the graphics, when it shows landfall (the 2nd landfall on norther gulf coast) the center of the storm seems to be so wide on the graphics, that it covers a large amount of real estate. Does that mean its possible that the center or cdo or wall of convection..is so wide that it would result in the graphics depicting it that way? How can you tell where it makes landfall...when the center stretches from mobile bay...to Destin Fla as depicted in one of those graphics resolution?
It's neigh impossible with the resolutions the global models run at. You would have to look for HWRF high-res for something that might resolve the center and get you a 20 mile point. Basically that last isobar can be interpreted as a cone where, anywhere in that area the center might be for the run. It's like trying to figure out which of the 'holes' of a spinning golf ball will impact the ground at a certain time. With enough mathematics you can make a guess. Good luck getting it right. Luckily hurricane centers are far bigger than a groove on a golf ball.
Great answer to a fairly ridiculous question. Thanks Sapphire
Pileus wrote:DeltaDog3, looking like the same setup during TS Alberto in 94 huh? Came ashore in Destin and stalled in Georgia dumping 27 inches rain over two days.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests