ATL: INVEST 95L

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Fehize
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 6
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: Columbus AFB, MS

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#41 Postby Fehize » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:08 pm

I'm personally hoping that it drifts a bit out into the ocean or just heads straight north. I would love so see rain here in south Texas~

That said, if it ends up to drift away towards LA, and not really form into anything larger that could sideswipe us, it'll just make my area have not even a cloud as it passes by. ;/
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


I love to draw~

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3296
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: Re:

#42 Postby fci » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:55 pm

bamajammer4eva wrote:
Dean4Storms wrote:JB thinks it has a chance.....

https://twitter.com/BigJoeBastardi/stat ... 88/photo/1


He's been saying for days lookout Southeast US-maybe this is what he meant



LOL, he's been saying that every year at about this time, no matter what!
Oh well, he is a Pro Met so he deserves some cred I guess.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#43 Postby ozonepete » Sun Aug 19, 2012 5:59 pm

:uarrow: lol, fci! How true.

I'm thinking this goes orange at 8PM. It looks like an LLC has formed and it's not going inland.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

Zanthe
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Age: 29
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:26 pm
Location: New Castle, PA

#44 Postby Zanthe » Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:07 pm

Probably a code orange at 11. Can you imagine if this and Helene was off the coast of, say, Texas? Two tropical systems forming back to back like this, it's amazing and pretty rare, no? In-fricking-sane.
0 likes   
I'm no expert, everything I say should be taken with a large amount of salt. I could easily be very, very wrong.
~Zanthe Go Coyotes~

User avatar
lester
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1305
Age: 35
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Washington, DC
Contact:

#45 Postby lester » Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:53 pm

2. CLOUDINESS AND SHOWERS LOCATED OVER THE SOUTHWESTERN GULF OF
MEXICO ARE ASSOCIATED WITH A SURFACE TROUGH. SOME GRADUAL
DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SYSTEM IS POSSIBLE AS LONG AS THE SYSTEM STAYS
OFFSHORE DURING THE NEXT DAY OR SO. THIS SYSTEM HAS A LOW
CHANCE...20 PERCENT...OF BECOMING A TROPICAL CYCLONE DURING THE
NEXT 48 HOURS. REGARDLESS OF DEVELOPMENT...HEAVY RAINFALL IS
POSSIBLE IN THE MEXICAN STATES OF TAMAULIPAS AND VERACRUZ DURING
THE NEXT DAY OR TWO.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6355
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

#46 Postby Dean4Storms » Sun Aug 19, 2012 6:59 pm

No sign of an LLC yet, just an MLC!
0 likes   

hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2904
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#47 Postby hurricanes1234 » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:32 pm

Why did all the convection dissipate? :lol: :?:
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#48 Postby ROCK » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:39 pm

because it has nothing at the surface to sustain the MLC....did this last night also....
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#49 Postby ozonepete » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:51 pm

Am I the only one who sees an LLC there? Looks pretty clear to me.
0 likes   

wjs3
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:57 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#50 Postby wjs3 » Sun Aug 19, 2012 7:56 pm

I dunno. Just looked at RGB...while there certainly is a lot of twisting going on, I'd expect the convection to be a lot deeper with an LLC. There's no shear (again, judging this from satellite), so I'd expect an LLC to really be firing off some deep convection...which does not seem to be the case.

What do you see?
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthernMet
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 857
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:23 pm
Location: fort worth, tx

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#51 Postby SouthernMet » Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:00 pm

The reason the convection has dramatically weakened is because it has been over the same waters for 2 days with very little movement.. And yes, though convection has waned, the overall structure has better defined itself.(LLC appearing)

Stay tuned
0 likes   
Nothing that SouthernMet posts, is an official forecast,nor does it reflect views of STORM2K.. SouthernMet is just adding to the great discussions on STORM2K.. Refer to NWS for official forecasts.

wjs3
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 7:57 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#52 Postby wjs3 » Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:09 pm

Well, OK, but if there was upwelling, there wouldn't be enough convection firing in the first place to create an LLC. Again, I dunno. Pretty impossible to tell at night. Maybe, maybe not.
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22499
Age: 66
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#53 Postby wxman57 » Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:17 pm

ozonepete wrote:Am I the only one who sees an LLC there? Looks pretty clear to me.


That rotation is not at the surface, it's probably 10,000-15,000 feet up or so. No chance of it coming to Texas as an upper-level trof is digging down across Texas tomorrow/Tuesday. NW winds aloft reaching the TX coast tomorrow morning (and SW winds ahead of that) would steer anything in the NW Gulf northeastward. That also means increasing shear as the system encounters the frontal zone. An unusually strong front for August. This system does not appear to be a tropical threat.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#54 Postby ozonepete » Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:18 pm

One reason why you can have a "naked swirl" LLC without any convection in the absence of shear is dry air. It's probably taken in dry air from subsiding air coming down from the mountains just inland from the coast. It will have a battle with this for a while, but since most of the circulation is over water the whole environment should ventually moisten up. but there is pretty clearly an LLC there if you look at the RGB satellite image.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

#55 Postby northjaxpro » Sun Aug 19, 2012 8:26 pm

OzonePete, the RGB image shows the low level swirl quite well just off the coast.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21228
Age: 41
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#56 Postby Aric Dunn » Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:39 pm

I still find it amazing that the models were able to resolve such obscure system.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

WilmingtonSandbar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Southport, NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#57 Postby WilmingtonSandbar » Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:52 pm

Just a question in case this should develop and move north to the CONUS. Have we ever had a recorded simultaneous double hit of 2 tropical cyclones on the CONUS. In other words, if 94L and 95L spun up and both made landfalls on the CONUS, has that happened before?
0 likes   
Diana X2 (look it up), Bertha, Fran, Bonnie, Floyd, Dennis, Charley, Ophelia, Ernesto, Irene, Matthew, And Florence

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4505
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#58 Postby psyclone » Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:57 pm

WilmingtonSandbar wrote:Just a question in case this should develop and move north to the CONUS. Have we ever had a recorded simultaneous double hit of 2 tropical cyclones on the CONUS. In other words, if 94L and 95L spun up and both made landfalls on the CONUS, has that happened before?

Bonnie and Charley struck in quick succession in 2004.
0 likes   

WilmingtonSandbar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Southport, NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#59 Postby WilmingtonSandbar » Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:00 pm

psyclone wrote:
WilmingtonSandbar wrote:Just a question in case this should develop and move north to the CONUS. Have we ever had a recorded simultaneous double hit of 2 tropical cyclones on the CONUS. In other words, if 94L and 95L spun up and both made landfalls on the CONUS, has that happened before?

Bonnie and Charley struck in quick succession in 2004.



But nothing at the same time? Like Gulf coast impact and an east coast impact on the same day?

I'm just wondering how they would split Jim Cantore in two? :double:
0 likes   
Diana X2 (look it up), Bertha, Fran, Bonnie, Floyd, Dennis, Charley, Ophelia, Ernesto, Irene, Matthew, And Florence

User avatar
vbhoutex
Storm2k Executive
Storm2k Executive
Posts: 28979
Age: 72
Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2002 11:31 pm
Location: Spring Branch area, Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 95L

#60 Postby vbhoutex » Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:51 am

Let's take the discussion back to 95L please.
0 likes   
Skywarn, C.E.R.T.
Please click below to donate to STORM2K to help with the expenses of keeping the site going:
Image


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests