ATL: DEBBY - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
MGC
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5796
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2003 9:05 pm
Location: Pass Christian MS, or what is left.

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#81 Postby MGC » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:53 pm

Just looking at the vis sat loop....low level circulation appears to be moving off the north coast of the Yucatan. Shear looks to be dropping fast over the southern GOM. 96L could ramp up quickly as it clears land.....MGC

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


edit by tolakram: added disclaimer
0 likes   

User avatar
drezee
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3644
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 12:49 pm
Location: FL

Re:

#82 Postby drezee » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:53 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:Just too many variables. still no defined center and until that happens we just wont know. if it consolidates farther east today where all the convection is than the models are initializing about 200 off. that changes a lot


Make sure the storm2K servers fans are clean and OS' patched...there will be a ton of traffic on the site over the next week...even a CAT1 in the gulf might bring too many users on the site...

I think the Euro solution keeps this thing in the gulf for a week...a named system for over 5 days by the looks of it
Last edited by drezee on Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#83 Postby ozonepete » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:54 pm

ROCK wrote:
cycloneye wrote:Shear will not be a big problem.

SHEAR (KT) 7 10 8 4 2 11 1 2 13 14 15 14 13


ftp://ftp.nhc.noaa.gov/atcf/stext/12062 ... _ships.txt



oh man that is not good....


Yeah, conditions look good for something pretty big. Man this is just a crazy start to the season.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 73
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#84 Postby Dave » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:54 pm

A reminder to the members to include our disclaimer if you are going to make a forecast or statement,thanks for your cooperation.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
bvigal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2275
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2005 8:49 am
Location: British Virgin Islands
Contact:

Re:

#85 Postby bvigal » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:55 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:Just too many variables. still no defined center and until that happens we just wont know. if it consolidates farther east today where all the convection is than the models are initializing about 200 off. that changes a lot


You are soooo right, Aric. This system could do almost anything, it's all a matter of timing, amidst too many variables right now. Let a center form, then models might make some sense. Does anyone doubt why NHC waited to start running these????
0 likes   

User avatar
Dave
Retired Staff
Retired Staff
Posts: 13442
Age: 73
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 3:57 pm
Location: Milan Indiana
Contact:

#86 Postby Dave » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:55 pm

A reminder to the members to include our disclaimer if you are going to make a forecast or statement,thanks for your cooperation.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   
This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#87 Postby ROCK » Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:59 pm

http://wxmaps.org/pix/hurpot.html#ATL


I dont think water temps will be a problem... :lol:
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 33398
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#88 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:00 pm

A monsoonal-like storm would also have much lower winds relative to its pressure, yet would be huge and potentially result in severe flooding...
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19182
Age: 60
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#89 Postby tolakram » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:00 pm

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139600
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#90 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:00 pm

Spagetti. :)

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

USTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2422
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#91 Postby USTropics » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:01 pm

I wouldn't get too caught up in these recent model runs. For those of us who have been following this for the past week or so, we've seen shifts as far west as Mexico, towards the central GOM states, and as far east as booking it through Florida and out to sea. Hence the reason for

"AND INTERESTS ALONG THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES GULF
COAST SHOULD MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THIS DISTURBANCE THROUGH THE
WEEKEND"

Where the actual LLC takes form at will go a long ways to where this storm will end up. To reiterate what Aric just stated, if initialization is more north and/or east you’re looking at a much more influenced system by the trough. Also if the trough is more pronounced as in previous runs it will have more of an impact on this potential system. A lot of variables still to be determined and now with an invest tag, the future model runs will bring things into better perspective.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10787
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#92 Postby GCANE » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:02 pm

TRMM spotted a Hot Tower just off the western tip of Cuba

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc12/A ... W.59pc.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 139600
Age: 67
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#93 Postby cycloneye » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:02 pm

CrazyC83 wrote:A monsoonal-like storm would also have much lower winds relative to its pressure, yet would be huge and potentially result in severe flooding...


And more problematic is the slow movement.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19182
Age: 60
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#94 Postby tolakram » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:03 pm

Latest

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4933
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#95 Postby Nimbus » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:05 pm

The center of circulation is just coming off the northern coast of the Yucatan but most of the convection is blowing up over near Cozumel. Hope it stays kind of disorganized before landfall.
0 likes   

Ntxw
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 21565
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 6:34 pm
Location: DFW, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#96 Postby Ntxw » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:05 pm

cycloneye wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:A monsoonal-like storm would also have much lower winds relative to its pressure, yet would be huge and potentially result in severe flooding...


And more problematic is the slow movement.


The Euro depicted this well. The storm cuts into the ridge resulting in little if any movement with no steering inland. When the next trough picks it up it will move over areas again that has already been rained on. This is if it heads west.
0 likes   
The above post and any post by Ntxw is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including Storm2k. For official information, please refer to NWS products.

  Help support Storm2K!
Help Support Storm2K

User avatar
Hurricane Andrew
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1891
Age: 25
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 2:53 pm
Location: KS

#97 Postby Hurricane Andrew » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:05 pm

Needs to wrap convection around.
0 likes   

The Enthusiast
NREMT-AEMT, WX nerd

Irene '11, Sandy '12, Irma '17 (SAR)

"Hard to think we were born to live this way..." -Wage War

User avatar
Tampa Bay Hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5596
Age: 36
Joined: Fri Jul 22, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: St. Petersburg, FL

#98 Postby Tampa Bay Hurricane » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:06 pm

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

To be honest, if this were late October, I would be worried for Florida. Again the track is very uncertain and can change quite a bit, but at this point in the summer it is very rare to have a trough strong enough
to send a system into Florida. The latest ECMWF, though it is just one run, and has been shifting, has confirmed my gut feeling. It shows that the trough will not be strong enough to influence the system, in part because of the system being in the S. GOM and not all that strong to begin with. Thus a gradual
westerly track long-term makes sense. Once in the central GOM shear will be low, there will be lots of moisture, and it will likely strengthen potentially to a hurricane. It is too early to tell whether it goes to TX, Mexico, or somewhere else in the W. GOM.

With that said, I can't rule out Florida because it is 6-7 days away. Actually, I can't rule out anywhere along the gulf at this time.
The models can change drastically so Do Not Let Your Guard Down if you live anywhere along the Gulf Coast.
Last edited by Tampa Bay Hurricane on Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:11 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9254
Age: 53
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Models

#99 Postby ROCK » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:07 pm

USTropics wrote:I wouldn't get too caught up in these recent model runs. For those of us who have been following this for the past week or so, we've seen shifts as far west as Mexico, towards the central GOM states, and as far east as booking it through Florida and out to sea. Hence the reason for

"AND INTERESTS ALONG THE ENTIRE UNITED STATES GULF
COAST SHOULD MONITOR THE PROGRESS OF THIS DISTURBANCE THROUGH THE
WEEKEND"

Where the actual LLC takes form at will go a long ways to where this storm will end up. To reiterate what Aric just stated, if initialization is more north and/or east you’re looking at a much more influenced system by the trough. Also if the trough is more pronounced as in previous runs it will have more of an impact on this potential system. A lot of variables still to be determined and now with an invest tag, the future model runs will bring things into better perspective.




Now I get what you are saying and I agree but when a reliable EURO flips over to a global that has been showing the same run over and over again you have to take something away from that....IKE is a prime example...the EURO saw the flip first and others followed. Looks like this is whats happening here....though RGV did say the UKMET showed this scenario first and I know Dr Masters loves the UKMET... :lol:
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10787
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 96L - Discussion

#100 Postby GCANE » Thu Jun 21, 2012 2:08 pm

That ULL at 28N 70W is supporting a very nice poleward outflow channel.

http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huwvloop.html

It appears to be deepening as well which in turn is enhancing UL outflow.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/a ... g8vor1.GIF

Also, an equatorward outflow channel in place as well.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=

Most likely will see more Hot Towers fire up and anti-cyclone stack over the LLC. In fact it is pretty close already.

http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/w ... oom=&time=
0 likes   


Return to “2012”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests