MiamiensisWx wrote:psyclone wrote:i agree that the TS warning for Florida should be dropped but it probably won't be until they're positive such conditions won't happen. the same thing happened here with Isaac in the tampa bay area. our warnings were continued well after it was obvious isaac was moving much farther west. i refer to these as "legacy warnings" and you see this quite a bit. my guess is that florida hazards will be primarily marine in nature with little in the way of true trouble on land.
These are the types of situations that make me concerned about future complacency due to unnecessary school closings, lost work hours, reduced productivity due to storm mode, et cetera. People may become more finicky in their decisions to prepare and may make incorrect judgments when a more serious event arises due to uncertainties surrounding the track. The same will occur elsewhere if the main impact of Sandy is in Canada and N Maine (as seems increasingly probable) rather than the greater Northeast / Mid-Atlantic--there has been so much coverage on the threat that many people cannot comprehend the possibility that it may not verify as models initially suggested. I know I was a bit guilty as well in terms of elevating the threat, though not as much as some people were.
The legacy warnings + media = perceptions that lead to expectations that may not verify but cause headaches in the process. When the next major disaster strikes the United States, I have a feeling that it will still cause many deaths and contain the element of surprise (even though it may well be warned and communicated quite well), simply due to human nature after all the storm fatigue over non- (or mostly non-) events.
Sorry to respond to what is probably off topic to the discussion of Sandy but I feel compelled (usually get in trouble when I do this

)
I don't know what you propose to do.
If the media does not present something that "could" happen, the critics blame them for not being upfront and honest.
When they do, and then the event does not occur, we hear what you have said above.
So what is the answer?
The answer is to do what has occurred here.
If a situation arises that poses danger, tell everyone what is possible.
Yes, if this happens a lot, people may become complacent.
But.....what is the alternative?
Off my "off-topic" soapbox.