Frank2 wrote:After reading all of the pro-met posts, it seems that the comment that the unexpected changes won't change the NHC track thinking seems to make the most sense (or in a Star Trek sense is the most logical : )
Oh, per the WV comments (one my own) I was told long ago that its a good tool because it shows the fluid dynamics of the atmosphere that the VIS or IR cannot see...
Frank
Lol, Frank. I am one of the pro-mets that said I don't expect any significant changes, just changes, and that I still don't expect it to reach the east coast at this time, but just get closer than previously thought. So I agree with Sandy.
The WV sat is a
great tool. And yes I said it's great for watching atmospheric motion, i.e. steering currents, which yes, the IR, visible and RGB don't show well. I just would never use it for determining what the low to mid level structure is doing and thus what the intensity trends are up to.