EPAC: AMANDA - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

#301 Postby hurricanes1234 » Sun May 25, 2014 7:36 am

Does anyone think it's strengthened since the last update? The cloud tops have continued to cool and organize even better.
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.

User avatar
xtyphooncyclonex
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3861
Age: 23
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 9:07 am
Location: Cebu City
Contact:

Re:

#302 Postby xtyphooncyclonex » Sun May 25, 2014 7:39 am

hurricanes1234 wrote:Does anyone think it's strengthened since the last update? The cloud tops have continued to cool and organize even better.

I do. A warming eye and cooling convection is usually a sign of a high intensity. I wonder how strong this could be.
0 likes   
REMINDER: My opinions that I, or any other NON Pro-Met in this forum, are unofficial. Please do not take my opinions as an official forecast and warning. I am NOT a meteorologist. Following my forecasts blindly may lead to false alarm, danger and risk if official forecasts from agencies are ignored.

hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

#303 Postby hurricanes1234 » Sun May 25, 2014 7:43 am

I'd say at least 125 knots, but in my opinion, 130 knots is not out of the question. I am still shocked at this hurricane.
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#304 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun May 25, 2014 7:44 am

I really want this to be raised to 125 knts so we can tie Adolph in terms of winds and possibly break it pressure wise.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

#305 Postby Extratropical94 » Sun May 25, 2014 7:46 am

Yellow Evan wrote:I really want this to be raised to 125 knts so we can tie Adolph in terms of winds and possibly break it pressure wise.


A raise to 145 mph (125 kt) is likely as dvorak numbers are already showing higher intensities:

TXPZ21 KNES 251217
TCSENP

A. 01E (AMANDA)

B. 25/1200Z

C. 11.7N

D. 111.2W

E. ONE/GOES-W

F. T6.5/6.5/D2.5/24HRS

G. IR/EIR/SWIR

H. REMARKS...DT=7.0 BASED ON WMG WITH WH RING EMBEDDED BY
CMG. PT=6.0. MET=5.5. FT IS BASED ON CONSTRAINTS LIMITING DEVELOPMENT
TO 2.5/24HRS.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...SCHWARTZ

T6.5 = 127.5 kt

SSD: 2014MAY25 120000 6.6 937.6 129.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 (Raw: 137 kt)

CIMSS: CI 6.6, Final 6.6, Adj 6.9, Raw 7.3 (CI: 130 kt, Raw: 149 kt)
Last edited by Extratropical94 on Sun May 25, 2014 7:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#306 Postby RL3AO » Sun May 25, 2014 7:46 am

Look at the latest BD image, its really really close to a T7.0. The CMG band might just be a touch narrow to get that though.

EDIT Well SSD saw the T7.0 but constraints limited them.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

#307 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun May 25, 2014 7:46 am

Spoiler?

Eric Blake @EricBlake12 · 52m

Amanda appears to be breaking most of the earliest strongest EPac records. Details to come...
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: EPAC: AMANDA - Hurricane

#308 Postby Dean4Storms » Sun May 25, 2014 7:46 am

I betcha Amanda is a Red Head! lol
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#309 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun May 25, 2014 7:47 am

Based on all those data I would say 130 kt.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re:

#310 Postby RL3AO » Sun May 25, 2014 7:48 am

CrazyC83 wrote:Based on all those data I would say 130 kt.


If it keeps this up, maybe 135kt by advisory time.
0 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16143
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re:

#311 Postby Yellow Evan » Sun May 25, 2014 7:49 am

Extratropical94 wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:I really want this to be raised to 125 knts so we can tie Adolph in terms of winds and possibly break it pressure wise.


A raise to 145 mph (125 kt) is likely as dvorak numbers are already showing higher intensities:

TXPZ21 KNES 251217
TCSENP

A. 01E (AMANDA)

B. 25/1200Z

C. 11.7N

D. 111.2W

E. ONE/GOES-W

F. T6.5/6.5/D2.5/24HRS

G. IR/EIR/SWIR

H. REMARKS...DT=7.0 BASED ON WMG WITH WH RING EMBEDDED BY
CMG. PT=6.0. MET=5.5. FT IS BASED ON CONSTRAINTS LIMITING DEVELOPMENT
TO 2.5/24HRS.

I. ADDL POSITIONS

NIL


...SCHWARTZ

T6.5 = 127.5 kt

SSD: 2014MAY25 120000 6.6 937.6 129.6 6.6 6.9 6.9 (Raw: 137 kt)

CIMSS: CI 6.6, Final 6.6, Adj 6.9, Raw 7.3 (CI: 130 kt, Raw: 149 kt)


Yea, I meant 125 knts. Post edited. Sorry, it's early.
0 likes   

User avatar
mrbagyo
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3715
Age: 33
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2012 9:18 am
Location: 14.13N 120.98E
Contact:

Re: EPAC: AMANDA - Hurricane

#312 Postby mrbagyo » Sun May 25, 2014 7:50 am

wow, its starting to develop a western band, a typical feature of intense tropical cyclones
Last edited by mrbagyo on Sun May 25, 2014 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC, NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

#313 Postby Extratropical94 » Sun May 25, 2014 7:51 am

Boom!

EP, 01, 2014052512, , BEST, 0, 117N, 1111W, 135, 932, HU
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#314 Postby RL3AO » Sun May 25, 2014 7:52 am

Its really hard for NHC to go 140 without recon. If we get some more dark grey on the dvorak IR images, they might do it.
0 likes   

hurricanes1234
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2907
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2012 6:19 pm
Location: Trinidad and Tobago

#315 Postby hurricanes1234 » Sun May 25, 2014 7:55 am

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! UNBELIEVABLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :eek: :eek: :eek:
ALMOST A CATEGORY 5!!!!!!!! :double:
0 likes   
PLEASE NOTE: With the exception of information from weather agencies that I may copy and paste here, my posts will NEVER be official, since I am NOT a meteorologist. They are solely my amateur opinion, and may or may not be accurate. Therefore, please DO NOT use them as official details, particularly when making important decisions. Thank you.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

#316 Postby RL3AO » Sun May 25, 2014 7:55 am

It took a while, but NHC finally caught up with this storm. I think they've been behind on intensity since the RI period began.
0 likes   

User avatar
Extratropical94
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 3538
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 6:36 am
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Contact:

Re:

#317 Postby Extratropical94 » Sun May 25, 2014 7:56 am

RL3AO wrote:Its really hard for NHC to go 140 without recon. If we get some more dark grey on the dvorak IR images, they might do it.


Do you know if they had recon in Celia (2010)?
0 likes   
54° 11' 59'' N, 9° 9' 20'' E
Boomer Sooner!
Go Broncos! Go Cards! Go Niners!
- Daniel

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: Re:

#318 Postby RL3AO » Sun May 25, 2014 8:01 am

Extratropical94 wrote:
RL3AO wrote:Its really hard for NHC to go 140 without recon. If we get some more dark grey on the dvorak IR images, they might do it.


Do you know if they had recon in Celia (2010)?


I don't believe so, but it was so clearly a T7.0 on satellite that they pulled the trigger. Basically my comment meant if it was one of those where its a borderline 6.5/7.0 they often keep it at 135. Just something I've noticed. I could be wrong.

http://www.nrlmry.navy.mil/tcdat/tc10/E ... -926mb.jpg
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145285
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re:

#319 Postby cycloneye » Sun May 25, 2014 8:01 am

RL3AO wrote:It took a while, but NHC finally caught up with this storm. I think they've been behind on intensity since the RI period began.


The post season analysis will be very interesting.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
TheAustinMan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1047
Age: 25
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:26 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re:

#320 Postby TheAustinMan » Sun May 25, 2014 8:02 am

Extratropical94 wrote:Boom!

EP, 01, 2014052512, , BEST, 0, 117N, 1111W, 135, 932, HU


If that stands, Amanda would have beaten Hurricane Adolph's (2001) strongest May EPAC hurricane record. In addition, it's winds and pressure would have made it the strongest tropical cyclone in the Western Hemisphere since Hurricane Dora of 2011. Go figure.
0 likes   
ImageImageImage
Treat my opinions with a grain of salt. For official information see your local weather service.


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests