ATL: BERTHA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4229
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#361 Postby abajan » Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:56 am

cycloneye wrote:TROPICAL WEATHER OUTLOOK
NWS NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER MIAMI FL
800 AM EDT WED JUL 30 2014

For the North Atlantic...Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico:

Showers and thunderstorms associated with an area of low pressure
located about 1150 miles east of the southern Windward Islands
remain limited. This system continues to show signs of
organization, however, and the low could develop into a tropical
depression later today or tomorrow while it moves generally
west-northwestward near 15 mph. Interests in the Lesser Antilles
should monitor the progress of this system.
* Formation chance through 48 hours...high...70 percent.
* Formation chance through 5 days...high...70 percent.

$$
Forecaster Pasch
With the current state of 93L, how can this be? 70%??
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3364
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

#362 Postby tropicwatch » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:05 am

I think it has a lot to do with the solid rotation it has and light shear. It should be able to develop under these condition IMO.
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re:

#363 Postby blp » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:17 am

panamatropicwatch wrote:I think it has a lot to do with the solid rotation it has and light shear. It should be able to develop under these condition IMO.


I agree, it does have good spin. The models are still suppporting this at least until the islands. It will be going over higher SST temperatures. Weak TS is probably are far as it gets.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#364 Postby wxman57 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:26 am

abajan wrote:With the current state of 93L, how can this be? 70%??


Think about it. The NHC's primary goal is public safety. We have a strong disturbance approaching a populated region. Which would promote public safety more - keeping the threat level up or reducing it? What if it suddenly developed as it moved into the Caribbean and lives were lost because the NHC indicated a decreasing risk? It's not just about coming up with as accurate an estimate of chance of development as possible, it's about public safety. I'm sure that the NHC forecasters realize that the chances of any significant development are decreasing. They just want the public to stay alert as it approaches.
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1728
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#365 Postby OuterBanker » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:33 am

I lie somewhere between Star Trek and Mony Python.

Most of me says "It's dead Jim."
Yet some of me is waving saying "I'm not dead yet."
0 likes   

Rail Dawg
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2012 5:02 pm
Location: Where the eye makes landfall.

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#366 Postby Rail Dawg » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:36 am

The spin itself is going to generate this into a TD. Enough inertia will get it through any weak spots and a solid flare of convection will kick this thing up.

The cyclonic rotation in and of itself provides a lifting mechanism.

I'm with NHC on this.
0 likes   
Although I have been a hurricane forecaster since 1980 that only means I've been wrong lots of times.

caribsue
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Jul 14, 2008 3:54 pm
Location: Barbados

#367 Postby caribsue » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:37 am

wxman57.... thank you for that .... this coming from someone who lives in Barbados.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

#368 Postby gatorcane » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:46 am

Saved image below...clearly struggling but still has a tight circulation and some new convection popping near the center. NHC states its showing signs of organization...movement looks due west to me...needs to starting gaining some latitude soon for the models to verify:

Image
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#369 Postby Frank2 » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:49 am

Think about it. The NHC's primary goal is public safety. We have a strong disturbance approaching a populated region. Which would promote public safety more - keeping the threat level up or reducing it? What if it suddenly developed as it moved into the Caribbean and lives were lost because the NHC indicated a decreasing risk? It's not just about coming up with as accurate an estimate of chance of development as possible, it's about public safety. I'm sure that the NHC forecasters realize that the chances of any significant development are decreasing. They just want the public to stay alert as it approaches.


True, almost always better to err on the side of caution - better to risk making a few posters grumpy that to endanger thousands of coastal residents : )

P.S. The system does seem to have outflow that it did not have yesterday...
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3364
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

#370 Postby tropicwatch » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:50 am

Still has not gone north of the magic 10 yet:)
Last edited by tropicwatch on Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3364
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

#371 Postby tropicwatch » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:53 am

A little off topic but the wave behind 93L has good rotation too.

http://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wi ... 8,2.08,572
0 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19990
Age: 61
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#372 Postby tolakram » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:54 am

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Sanibel
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 10375
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: Offshore SW Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#373 Postby Sanibel » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:56 am

I don't think I've ever seen dry air take down a forming system so badly.
0 likes   

User avatar
Fego
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 767
Age: 65
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 7:58 pm
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#374 Postby Fego » Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:58 am

:uarrow: Imo is a mix of the great expectation and our memory playing games :roll: .
0 likes   
Go Giants! Go Niners! Go Warriors!

User avatar
abajan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4229
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 5:10 am
Location: Barbados

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#375 Postby abajan » Wed Jul 30, 2014 8:01 am

wxman57 wrote:
abajan wrote:With the current state of 93L, how can this be? 70%??


Think about it. The NHC's primary goal is public safety. We have a strong disturbance approaching a populated region. Which would promote public safety more - keeping the threat level up or reducing it? What if it suddenly developed as it moved into the Caribbean and lives were lost because the NHC indicated a decreasing risk? It's not just about coming up with as accurate an estimate of chance of development as possible, it's about public safety. I'm sure that the NHC forecasters realize that the chances of any significant development are decreasing. They just want the public to stay alert as it approaches.

Sorry but I don't agree. I know I'm going to get lots of backlash for this but I think they should simply state what they truly feel the percentages for development are. Maybe they could include a disclaimer that the percentages are not set in stone and that things could quickly change.

Nevertheless, thanks for your reply.
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re:

#376 Postby blp » Wed Jul 30, 2014 8:16 am

gatorcane wrote:Saved image below...clearly struggling but still has a tight circulation and some new convection popping near the center. NHC states its showing signs of organization...movement looks due west to me...needs to starting gaining some latitude soon for the models to verify:

http://i57.tinypic.com/osg4kn.jpg[/img]


Good point, I posted a similar thought earlier in the models thread where it seems to me that 50W is the point where most models start the WNW movement. It will be interesting later on tonight when it get close will that change happen otherwise the models will be off.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#377 Postby SFLcane » Wed Jul 30, 2014 8:57 am

Just can't see this disturbance doing much of anything in an environment like this.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Hyperstorm
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1500
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:48 am
Location: Ocala, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#378 Postby Hyperstorm » Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:01 am

Folks, remember that the GFS (Yes, the same model that has been persistently calling for development) predicted that today was going to be a very hostile day for this disturbance. It is verifying. According to the GFS, a stronger burst of development will begin tomorrow and Friday. It looks like the GFS is seeing the interaction of this disturbance with the upper-level system NE of the islands as something positive that would initiate a good burst of convection. If the system still keeps its circulation, the burst of convection would classify it.

I don't see this system moving straight west into the Caribbean, regardless of development. Remember, not every system that remains a tropical wave/low moves straight west. Bursts of convection would cause it to be impacted more by the upper-levels...and if the interaction with the upper-low starting tomorrow is an indicator for a growing burst of convection, this system is going to be pulled NW.

This post is NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECAST and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Last edited by cycloneye on Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: To add te S2K disclaimer
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143877
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 93L - Discussion

#379 Postby cycloneye » Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:20 am

The squadron is still going with the missions beginning on Thursday. See the missions at the 93L Recon Thread
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#380 Postby Alyono » Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:25 am

I'd say development chances are cratering now.

May be close to 25%... and that is probably being generous
0 likes   


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests