WPAC: RAMMASUN - Post-Tropical

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#421 Postby Alyono » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:24 am

I know I'm ripping JTWC... but some of the mistakes being made are just bizarre. I'd trust many posters here before JT as I know they wouldn't miss some of the things being missed
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#422 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:36 am

I'd say the landfall intensity was 110 kt. Perhaps land interaction kept it from reaching the Dvorak estimates as fast...
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#423 Postby euro6208 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:45 am

WOW! up to 110 knots per the latest best track!

likely this represents the landfalling intensity which i believe Rammasun made landfall with...
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#424 Postby Alyono » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:46 am

weakening now based upon the latest imagery. As expected as this moves over land. Real intensity is now probably in the 85-90 kt range.

The bad news is it is starting to turn WNW... aiming for Manila. I'd expect gusts to 90 mph in the center of the city
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#425 Postby euro6208 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 8:50 am

Latest best track has winds up to 110 knots which i believe was the landfalling intensity had it come out sooner before landfall but rammasun has now weaken due to land interaction probrably down to 85 to 90 knots when the 18Z update comes out later...
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#426 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:05 am

Yeah I think Cat 1 conditions in Manila seem reasonable. That is still scary for a major metropolitan area...
0 likes   

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re:

#427 Postby dexterlabio » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:06 am

CrazyC83 wrote:I'd say the landfall intensity was 110 kt. Perhaps land interaction kept it from reaching the Dvorak estimates as fast...



I was going for 115 kts but I doubt there will ever be a report from a reliable station to support this intensity. It looks like an intense Category 3 typhoon when it first hit Albay province.

The arrival of the eye in Albay was covered by the local media, and IMO it's nothing like a Cat1-2 typhoon footage. Almost the same scene when Xangxane hit the Philippines in 2006.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re:

#428 Postby dexterlabio » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:14 am

Alyono wrote:weakening now based upon the latest imagery. As expected as this moves over land. Real intensity is now probably in the 85-90 kt range.

The bad news is it is starting to turn WNW... aiming for Manila. I'd expect gusts to 90 mph in the center of the city



Moving more WNW is a bit of good news IMO, it will track along the mountainous area of Quezon province and Camarines...it will spend more time weakening over rugged terrain before touchdown in Manila..


Haaa, I'm just hoping the electric lines and posts around Manila are better now than the time of Xangxane...
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: Re:

#429 Postby Alyono » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:16 am

dexterlabio wrote:
CrazyC83 wrote:I'd say the landfall intensity was 110 kt. Perhaps land interaction kept it from reaching the Dvorak estimates as fast...



I was going for 115 kts but I doubt there will ever be a report from a reliable station to support this intensity. It looks like an intense Category 3 typhoon when it first hit Albay province.

The arrival of the eye in Albay was covered by the local media, and IMO it's nothing like a Cat1-2 typhoon footage. Almost the same scene when Xangxane hit the Philippines in 2006.


Here is the issue with using media reports to judge intensity

The media almost certainly did not record the worst of Xangxane. Many media reports from a cat 4 only have TS winds.

Being in an upper cat 2 is the same as being in a low end EF3 tornado due to the gusts. Those winds will destroy most structures. It is just that few actually experience the strongest winds
0 likes   

dexterlabio
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3468
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 11:50 pm

Re: Re:

#430 Postby dexterlabio » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:30 am

Alyono wrote:
Here is the issue with using media reports to judge intensity

The media almost certainly did not record the worst of Xangxane. Many media reports from a cat 4 only have TS winds.

Being in an upper cat 2 is the same as being in a low end EF3 tornado due to the gusts. Those winds will destroy most structures. It is just that few actually experience the strongest winds



I was comparing the scene of Xangxane that I personally witnessed here in Manila, to the media footage of Rammasun in Albay this afternoon....granted though, Xangxane weakened to a Cat3 then...

I also got your point, a strong Cat2 is savage enough. My question though is what difference it will make if the eye passes just north or south of Metro Manila?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145295
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#431 Postby cycloneye » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:36 am

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#432 Postby Alyono » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:37 am

if it passes just north of Manila, Manila would be on the weaker side of the storm. Could see a difference of about 15 kts in wind speed if it passes north vs south
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#433 Postby euro6208 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:38 am

Latest discussion...

WDPN32 PGTW 151500
MSGID/GENADMIN/JOINT TYPHOON WRNCEN PEARL HARBOR HI//
SUBJ/PROGNOSTIC REASONING FOR TYPHOON 09W (RAMMASUN) WARNING NR 21//
RMKS//
1. FOR METEOROLOGISTS.
2. 6 HOUR SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS.
TYPHOON (TY) 09W (RAMMASUN), LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 152 NM EAST-
SOUTHEAST OF MANILA, PHILIPPINES, HAS TRACKED WEST-NORTHWESTWARD
AT 14 KNOTS OVER THE PAST SIX HOURS. ANIMATED ENHANCED INFRARED
(EIR) SATELLITE IMAGERY DEPICTS A WELL-STRUCTURED SYSTEM AS TY 09W
MOVES OVER LAND. THE CURRENT POSITION IS BASED ON A HIGH CONFIDENCE
SATELLITE EYE FIX ON A CLEAR, 20 NM DIAMETER EYE EVIDENT ON THE EIR
ANIMATION AND 150912Z SSMIS MICROWAVE IMAGERY. THE INITIAL INTENSITY
HAS INCREASED TO 110 KNOTS, SLIGHTLY LOWER THAN CONSISTENT DVORAK
ESTIMATES FROM PGTW, KNES, AND RJTD DUE TO THE CYCLONE BEING ON
LAND. UPPER-LEVEL ANALYSIS CONTINUE TO INDICATE
TY 09W REMAINS IN FAVORABLE ENVIRONMENT WITH LOW (05 TO 10 KNOT)
VERTICAL WIND SHEAR (VWS) AND EXCELLENT POLEWARD AND WESTWARD
OUTFLOW. TY 09W IS CURRENTLY TRACKING WEST-NORTHWESTWARD ALONG THE
SOUTHERN PERIPHERY OF THE SUBTROPICAL RIDGE (STR) TO THE NORTH.
3. FORECAST REASONING.
A. THE INTENSITY FORECAST HAS BEEN INCREASED FOR EVERY POSITION
THROUGH TAU 72 DUE TO THE RAPID INTENSIFICATION OF A WELL-DEFINED
SYSTEM AND AN OVERALL INCREASE IN OBJECTIVE AID INTENSITY GUIDANCE.
B. TY 09W IS FORECAST TO REMAIN ON WEST-NORTHWESTWARD TRACK OVER
THE NEXT 06 HOURS UNDER THE STEERING INFLUENCE OF THE STR. THE
TYPHOON WILL TURN SLIGHTLY MORE POLEWARD BY TAU 12 AS IT
ENCOUNTERS A WEAKNESS IN THE STR INDUCED BY A SHORTWAVE TROUGH
PASSING OVER EASTERN CHINA. TYPHOON RAMMASUN WILL WEAKEN
CONSIDERABLY AS IT TRACKS ACROSS SOUTHERN LUZON AND INTO MANILA OVER
THE NEXT 12 HOURS.
HOWEVER, TY 09W IS EXPECTED TO REINTENSIFY AFTER
REEMERGING OVER THE SOUTH CHINA SEA (SCS) TO A CONTINUATION OF THE
AFOREMENTIONED FAVORABLE ENVIRONMENT. WARM SEA SURFACE TEMPERATURES
IN THE SCS AND CONTINUED FAVORABLE UPPER-LEVEL CONDITIONS WILL FAVOR
FURTHER RAPID RE-INTENSIFICATION, PEAKING AT 120 KNOTS PRIOR MAKING
LANDFALL OVER NORTHERN HAINAN ISLAND AROUND TAU 72.
C. IN THE EXTENDED TAUS, THE SYSTEM WILL MAINTAIN A NORTHWESTWARD
TRAJECTORY AS IT CROSSES THE GULF OF TONKIN. LAND INTERACTION WILL
PRIMARILY CAUSE ITS WEAKENING; HOWEVER, TY 09W WILL MAINTAIN TYPHOON
STRENGTH AS IT MAKES THE FINAL LANDFALL INTO NORTHERN VIETNAM NEAR
HANOI. AVAILABLE MODEL GUIDANCE IS IN GOOD AGREEMENT WITH SOME
DIFFERENCES IN TRACK SPEED BUT IS OTHERWISE TIGHTLY GROUPED, LENDING
TO HIGH CONFIDENCE IN THE FORECAST TRACK. HOWEVER, THERE IS STILL
UNCERTAINTY IN THE INTENSITY FORECAST DUE TO THE EXTENT OF THE
WEAKENING ANTICIPATED WITH THE LAND INTERACTION, THEREFORE, THERE IS
OVERALL LOW CONFIDENCE IN THE JTWC FORECAST.//
NNNN
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#434 Postby euro6208 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 9:59 am

Image

Image

Euro showing a powerful typhoon for hainan island and vietnam...

The philippines ain't in the clear yet so hoping for this to rapidly weaken and turns out weaker...
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

#435 Postby CrazyC83 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:06 am

I know Legaspi had 966mb as the eyewall passed with 25 kt winds (and those are hourly obs), then 971mb after the flip with 48 kt winds. I would guess 954mb was the minimum pressure as a result, accounting for the obs not being real time and the distance to the eye.

http://www.wunderground.com/history/sta ... story.html
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#436 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:10 am

I'm looking at high-res ECMWF output and see a forecast of 55 to 60 kts for landfall in Hainan. Euro has yet to forecast Rammasun to be a typhoon. It had Rammasun as a 50kt TS at landfall in the Philippines.
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#437 Postby euro6208 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:12 am

wxman57 wrote:I'm looking at high-res ECMWF output and see a forecast of 55 to 60 kts for landfall in Hainan. Euro has yet to forecast Rammasun to be a typhoon. It had Rammasun as a 50kt TS at landfall in the Philippines.


wow what's wrong with my euro? 50 knots? :lol:
0 likes   

euro6208

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#438 Postby euro6208 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:15 am

so i guess this 961 mb earlier posted was not from the eye but from the eyewall...
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

#439 Postby Alyono » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:16 am

the 961 could have been from the eye. We had 966 just outside of the eye. Also, a 10 minute wind (likely) not too far from the eye of 51 mph. 10 min wind not that meaningful though as I'm sure strongest winds were not over any area for 10 minutes
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: WPAC: RAMMASUN - Typhoon

#440 Postby wxman57 » Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:32 am

euro6208 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I'm looking at high-res ECMWF output and see a forecast of 55 to 60 kts for landfall in Hainan. Euro has yet to forecast Rammasun to be a typhoon. It had Rammasun as a 50kt TS at landfall in the Philippines.


wow what's wrong with my euro? 50 knots? :lol:


It initialized Rammasun at 55kts for 00Z on last night's run - way too low.
0 likes   


Return to “2014”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests