ATL: KAREN - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10163
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#361 Postby SFLcane » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:41 pm

ozonepete wrote:Very impressive change in the circulation just in the last 6 hours. This has developed very good symmetry on satellite and along with the great upper outflow and being over bathtub water it can quite possibly blow up even with DMIN occurring.



Yep! still not sure if iam seeing correctly though.. is this in the atlantic?

very nice outflow and great symmetry as u stated with plenty of heat content just below.
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#362 Postby chaser1 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:42 pm

Just as a side-note....... In the peculiar event that this system doesnt receive a surprise visit from the "dust fairy", Karen forming could also be indicative of additional development to occur over the next 4-6 weeks. I"m just suggesting that in the event of a healthy "normal" hurricane were to develop, it may be indication that overall conditions have begun to change - at least a little.

Interestingly too, WHAT phase is the MJO in right now??????
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
beoumont
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 473
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2011 4:13 pm
Location: East Central Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#363 Postby beoumont » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:42 pm

Bomb over circulation center: it appears the pressure has fallen 2+ mb. since recon started this mission 4 hrs ago. (Diurnal??).

Image
Last edited by beoumont on Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
List of 79 tropical cyclones intercepted by Richard Horodner:
http://www.canebeard.com/page/page/572246.htm

HurricaneTracker2031
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 248
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#364 Postby HurricaneTracker2031 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:42 pm

My Opinion on 97L: http://goo.gl/fisrER
Synopsis: 97L is organizing and Hurricane Hunters are finding interesting information.

Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
0 likes   
SHORT VERSION OF DISCLAIMER: THIS SITE LINK BELOW IS NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECASTING OFFICE AND SHOULD NOT BE USED TO MAKE ANY EMERGENCY DECISIONS....

http://www.macstropicalweather.weebly.com

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#365 Postby hurricaneCW » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:43 pm

Let's not get ahead of ourselves, we've been burnt many times. It looks like an organizing system though, especially on visible but that doesn't mean it will be a significant system. It has yet to be classified.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#366 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:44 pm

recon finding the center on this farther north again.. clearly being pulled to convective burst
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#367 Postby Stormcenter » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:46 pm

Oh I think this is the real deal for "at least" a TD. IMO


hurricaneCW wrote:Let's not get ahead of ourselves, we've been burnt many times. It looks like an organizing system though, especially on visible but that doesn't mean it will be a significant system. It has yet to be classified.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#368 Postby CrazyC83 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:48 pm

Stormcenter wrote:Oh I think this is the real deal for "at least" a TD. IMO


hurricaneCW wrote:Let's not get ahead of ourselves, we've been burnt many times. It looks like an organizing system though, especially on visible but that doesn't mean it will be a significant system. It has yet to be classified.


It won't be a TD, since Recon found winds supporting much stronger.
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#369 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:48 pm

0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#370 Postby chaser1 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:49 pm

hurricaneCW wrote:Let's not get ahead of ourselves, we've been burnt many times. It looks like an organizing system though, especially on visible but that doesn't mean it will be a significant system. It has yet to be classified.


:multi: Cat. 4 baby! ("the preceeding was a delerious outburst caused by a condition that doctors refer to as, Dryacane-itis.)
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#371 Postby wxman57 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:51 pm

Recon supports about 35 kts. I think there are still a lot of "suspect" SFMR winds, particularly when they're a good bit higher than FL winds.
0 likes   

User avatar
TropicalAnalystwx13
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2109
Age: 27
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 8:20 pm
Location: Wilmington, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#372 Postby TropicalAnalystwx13 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:52 pm

beoumont wrote:Bomb over circulation center: it appears the pressure has fallen 2+ mb. since recon started this mission 4 hrs ago. (Diurnal??).

http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/9717/hhmx.jpg

We're approaching diurnal minimum, surrounding atmospheric pressures should be rising instead of falling. The fact that they are decreasing is a sign that 97L is organizing.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#373 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:52 pm

wxman57 wrote:Recon supports about 35 kts. I think there are still a lot of "suspect" SFMR winds, particularly when they're a good bit higher than FL winds.


Yeah the that they just measured was inside that convective burst. 35 to 40kt at the most
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

#374 Postby Aric Dunn » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:54 pm

wow the center being pulled very quickly to the n to nne into that convection recon did a quick turn around and the center moved/ reforming north of the previous location..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#375 Postby wxman57 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:54 pm

I've still seen no evidence from recon of a well-defined LLC. Tropical waves/disturbances can often have TS-force winds in heavier squalls.
0 likes   

HurricaneTracker2031
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 248
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#376 Postby HurricaneTracker2031 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:55 pm

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:
beoumont wrote:Bomb over circulation center: it appears the pressure has fallen 2+ mb. since recon started this mission 4 hrs ago. (Diurnal??).

http://img585.imageshack.us/img585/9717/hhmx.jpg

We're approaching diurnal minimum, surrounding atmospheric pressures should be rising instead of falling. The fact that they are decreasing is a sign that 97L is organizing.



Exactly... But the question is how much did it organize? I'm thinking at least min TS...
0 likes   
SHORT VERSION OF DISCLAIMER: THIS SITE LINK BELOW IS NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECASTING OFFICE AND SHOULD NOT BE USED TO MAKE ANY EMERGENCY DECISIONS....

http://www.macstropicalweather.weebly.com

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#377 Postby chaser1 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:56 pm

well, "if" and "when" we do finally have a clear defined center to follow, it will be very interesting to then see how the models do with 97L. I certainly would think most would indicate some greater eastward tendancy
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

HurricaneTracker2031
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 248
Age: 25
Joined: Fri Jul 19, 2013 7:20 pm
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL, USA
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#378 Postby HurricaneTracker2031 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:57 pm

chaser1 wrote:well, "if" and "when" we do finally have a clear defined center to follow, it will be very interesting to then see how the models do with 97L. I certainly would think most would indicate some greater eastward tendancy



How east? Towards NE?
0 likes   
SHORT VERSION OF DISCLAIMER: THIS SITE LINK BELOW IS NOT AN OFFICIAL FORECASTING OFFICE AND SHOULD NOT BE USED TO MAKE ANY EMERGENCY DECISIONS....

http://www.macstropicalweather.weebly.com

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#379 Postby ozonepete » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:58 pm

Aric Dunn wrote:
wxman57 wrote:Recon supports about 35 kts. I think there are still a lot of "suspect" SFMR winds, particularly when they're a good bit higher than FL winds.


Yeah the that they just measured was inside that convective burst. 35 to 40kt at the most


Well it's a very large system that is only now consolidating a center so those wind speeds make sense at this early stage. Still, it is doing it the "right way".
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion - 70% / 70%

#380 Postby wxman57 » Wed Oct 02, 2013 4:58 pm

chaser1 wrote:well, "if" and "when" we do finally have a clear defined center to follow, it will be very interesting to then see how the models do with 97L. I certainly would think most would indicate some greater eastward tendancy


That will not likely make any difference. Models are already being initialized with a vortex there.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests