ATL: GABRIELLE - Remnants - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: Re:

#661 Postby ozonepete » Tue Sep 03, 2013 8:59 pm

WYNweather wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:When is D-Max?


Diurnal maximum and minimum. During the day it is diurnal minimum over water because, the surrounding air has less specific heat capacity than the sea,and thus warms faster, but cools down faster during the night. During the night time, the water is typically warmer than the surrounding air. Now the air near the surface which is in contact with the water warms by conduction, and then begin to rise. The during the day, the warming of the air which is above the water creates a quasi-capping inversion, inhibiting convection. Keep in mind that air rises from the surface to the higher levels, so when the air warmer than the sea during the day, it acts as a lid.

From weather underground.


I love weather underground but they miss the boat on this one. The most important part is that the tall thunderstorms needed for development are driven by the very large difference between the warm tropical maritime air below the storms and the very cold air high up above at the thunderstorm tops. During the day the incoming solar radiation gradually heats the tops of the clouds and this reduces the difference in temp from bottom to top of the thunderstorms which causes weakening. At night the solar input is lost and the cloud tops grow colder, allowing the thunderstorms to intensify and build even higher.
0 likes   

ninel conde

#662 Postby ninel conde » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:02 pm

im less convinced of a recurve. i think a recurve is highly dependent on the double low remaining intact which seems unlikely.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#663 Postby Blown Away » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:07 pm

Nearly all the guidance we see now shows a WNW movement to just north of Hispaniola and then sharp NNE turn...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
SFLcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10162
Age: 47
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Lake Worth Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#664 Postby SFLcane » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:12 pm

Naked swirl in a few hrs... Please go away :spam:

Image
0 likes   

TJRE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 188
Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 9:04 am
Location: New Jersey

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#665 Postby TJRE » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:13 pm

ozonepete wrote:
TJRE wrote:Cimms -Mid-Level Shear 0000Z


The chart also shows the direction of the shear - so we can see it is a clockwise flow right over the lower to mid-circ right now. That doesn't tell us anything about the upper flow so I would never use this chart to determine if there's a beneficial upper high over it. If you want to know that just use their upper level wind chart, ok?


Thanks O.P. :wink:

UNDERSTOOD!!!
TJ

the GOES severe page has some nice Sat coverage here
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/g8severe.html

Image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Last edited by TJRE on Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143928
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#666 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:13 pm

Updated discussion from the San Juan NWS.


AREA FORECAST DISCUSSION...UPDATED
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE SAN JUAN PR
939 PM AST TUE SEP 3 2013

.SYNOPSIS...SUBEQUATORIAL RIDGE WILL BUILD OVER PR BY THU AND
ESTABLISH BETWEEN THE DOM REP AND PR THROUGH THE END OF THE WEEK.
WEAK AREA OF LOW PRES OVR THE ERN CARIB WILL MOVE WNW PASSING
SOUTH OF PR WED NIGHT AND MOVE NORTH OF HISPANIOLA FRI.

&&

.DISCUSSION...GLOBAL MODELS CONTINUE TO PAINT A VERY WET SCENARIO
FOR PR THROUGH THE END OF THE WEEK FIRST ASSOCIATED WITH THE MID
LEVEL CIRCULATION OVER THE ERN CARIB WED-WED NIGHT THEN WITH A
LONG FETCH SE FLOW THU-FRI AS MID LEVEL CIRCULATION LIFTS NORTH
OF HISPANIOLA. HOWEVER...SOME DIFFERENCES STILL SHOW UP ON THE
MODELS WITH RESPECT TO TIMING OF WHEN THE PERIOD OF MOST INTENSE
RAINFALL WILL OCCUR WITH GFS SHOWING WED-WED NIGHT AND ECMWF
INDICATING WED NIGHT-THU. ANYWAY...MOISTURE...LIFT AND
INSTABILITY LOOK PRETTY IMPRESSIVE WED-FRI TO SUSTAIN LONG PERIODS
OF HEAVY RAINFALL AND WHEN YOU ADD TOPOGRAPHY INTO THE MIX
POTENTIAL IS THERE FOR SIGNIFICANT THREE-DAY RAINFALL TOTALS. IS
NOT REALLY UNTIL SAT WHEN LOW-LEVEL CONVERGENCE WEAKENS ENOUGH TO
NOT LONGER SUPPORT LONG PERIODS OF RAIN. BUT EVEN THEN...MOIST
SSE FLOW WILL KEEP SHOWERS IN THE FCST THROUGH EARLY NEXT WEEK. IS
NOT UNTIL LATE MON WHEN TRADES FINALLY ESTABLISH OVER THE REGION
AND ATMOSPHERE RETURNS TO NORMAL.

LOOKING AT SATELLITE TRENDS IT APPEARS TO ME THAT THE GFS TIMING
OF LATE WED THRU WED NIGHT WILL BE THE PERIOD OF MOST INTENSE
RAINFALL. ALSO...SATELLITE BASED RAINFALL ESTIMATES OVER THE PAST
24 HRS SHOW 4-8 INCHES FELL OVER A LARGE AREA TO THE EAST OF THE
ANTILLES. WHEN YOU LOOK AT A THREE-DAY EVENT AVERAGE AMOUNTS
TYPICALLY AVERAGE OUT TO 10 INCHES. WHEN LOOKING AT THE CURRENT
FLOOD WATCH WE ARE CALLING FOR 3-6 INCHES OF RAIN BEFORE FRI
MORNING. I BELIEVE OUR CURR FORECAST IS UNDERDONE AND WILL BE
RAISING TOTALS TO MATCH UP SATELLITE BASED RAINFALL ESTIMATES
WHICH COULD BE CONSERVATIVE.
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

WYNweather
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 65
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:14 pm

Re: Re:

#667 Postby WYNweather » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:15 pm

ozonepete wrote:
WYNweather wrote:
TheStormExpert wrote:When is D-Max?


Diurnal maximum and minimum. During the day it is diurnal minimum over water because, the surrounding air has less specific heat capacity than the sea,and thus warms faster, but cools down faster during the night. During the night time, the water is typically warmer than the surrounding air. Now the air near the surface which is in contact with the water warms by conduction, and then begin to rise. The during the day, the warming of the air which is above the water creates a quasi-capping inversion, inhibiting convection. Keep in mind that air rises from the surface to the higher levels, so when the air warmer than the sea during the day, it acts as a lid.

From weather underground.


I love weather underground but they miss the boat on this one. The most important part is that the tall thunderstorms needed for development are driven by the very large difference between the warm tropical maritime air below the storms and the very cold air high up above at the thunderstorm tops. During the day the incoming solar radiation gradually heats the tops of the
clouds and this reduces the difference in temp from bottom to top of the thunderstorms which causes weakening. At night the solar input is lost and the cloud tops grow colder, allowing the thunderstorms to intensify and build even higher.



Thanks
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#668 Postby ozonepete » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:18 pm

:uarrow: Well be careful, Luis. Looks like a serious flood threat.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#669 Postby ozonepete » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:24 pm

I really am puzzled by this whole scenario. More than once in the last 24-48 hours both have started behaving as if they're developing separately, as it looks right now, and I get tempted to think that both could develop into two separate storms. Although that would be a really rare occurrence, it's not unheard of. (So you are asking a good question Hammy. :) )
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143928
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#670 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:25 pm

ozonepete wrote::uarrow: Well be careful, Luis. Looks like a serious flood threat.


Yes,our main threat regardless of what this turns out to be is the rainfall.Here is one model of rainfall that is forecasting a dire situation.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

ninel conde

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#671 Postby ninel conde » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:25 pm

ozonepete wrote:I really am puzzled by this whole scenario. More than once in the last 24-48 hours both have started behaving as if they're developing separately, as it looks right now, and I get tempted to think that both could develop into two separate storms. Although that would be a really rare occurrence, it's not unheard of. (So you are asking a good question Hammy. :) )



too close together.
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9483
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#672 Postby ROCK » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:29 pm

whats to close together? these 2 entities are not that close.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#673 Postby ozonepete » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:31 pm

ninel conde wrote:
ozonepete wrote:I really am puzzled by this whole scenario. More than once in the last 24-48 hours both have started behaving as if they're developing separately, as it looks right now, and I get tempted to think that both could develop into two separate storms. Although that would be a really rare occurrence, it's not unheard of. (So you are asking a good question Hammy. :) )



too close together.


Not at all. I said it's not unheard of, which means I have actually seen systems this close develop into two separate TCs a number of times, especially over the tropical Pacific where it is more common.
0 likes   

ozonepete
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 4743
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:23 pm
Location: From Ozone Park, NYC / Now in Brooklyn, NY

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#674 Postby ozonepete » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:32 pm

ROCK wrote:whats to close together? these 2 entities are not that close.


thanks, rock. And I'm getting more of a feeling we may be watching that rare event. Now THAT would help make this a season to remember.
0 likes   

SeGaBob

#675 Postby SeGaBob » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:44 pm

Convection seems to be waning a bit but i do see new storms forming near 15.5N 63.5W.

I may be a little bit off though because I'm not so great with coordinates.

http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... -long.html
Last edited by SeGaBob on Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

ninel conde

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#676 Postby ninel conde » Tue Sep 03, 2013 9:51 pm

ozonepete wrote:
ninel conde wrote:
ozonepete wrote:I really am puzzled by this whole scenario. More than once in the last 24-48 hours both have started behaving as if they're developing separately, as it looks right now, and I get tempted to think that both could develop into two separate storms. Although that would be a really rare occurrence, it's not unheard of. (So you are asking a good question Hammy. :) )



too close together.


Not at all. I said it's not unheard of, which means I have actually seen systems this close develop into two separate TCs a number of times, especially over the tropical Pacific where it is more common.


john hope said they need to be at least 600 miles apart for both to develop.
0 likes   

User avatar
boca
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6365
Age: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2003 8:49 am
Location: Boca Raton,FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#677 Postby boca » Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:01 pm

If both systems develop into separate systems then how would that affect the track of each one?
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 143928
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#678 Postby cycloneye » Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:04 pm

00z surface analysis tracks low thru Mona Channel.

Image
0 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

User avatar
baytownwx
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 10:38 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#679 Postby baytownwx » Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:08 pm

I love reading this forum and learning as much as I can. With that said, for those that post links please use the URL tab and then copy the link in-between. This allows a new window to open. I don't know how many times tonight I have clicked on a link only to accidentally close out of my storm2k session. Thank you and keep up the great discussions! :D
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

ninel conde

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Discussion

#680 Postby ninel conde » Tue Sep 03, 2013 10:09 pm

boca wrote:If both systems develop into separate systems then how would that affect the track of each one?


joe bastardi has a theory about that. the trailing low might force the lead low more west. if both did develop i feel they would just march on out to sea, yet one may get left behind under the growing wheel.
0 likes   


Return to “2013”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests