ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1021 Postby Steve » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:19 pm

tolakram wrote:
psyclone wrote:
toad strangler wrote:
There are a TON of wx weenies here. :spam:


I thought we used to have a model discussion thread (like the recon discussion thread). that needs to be brought back. Or, as an alternative, make the model thread image only posts to force the discussion over here. I prefer option A.


We already have too many threads. Just need to train people to not talk in the model thread and come back over here. It's a work in progress. :)


Just my opinion but I wish there was a per storm thread that covered all the bases. It would only have to be moderated for stupidity and trolling. Y'all could always have side recon based or personal observation based threads. But when you moderate for content, and several threads cross over, overlap will happen. It has to because models are a discussion item.
1 likes   

User avatar
La Sirena
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: Formerly of the Keys, back home in East TN

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1022 Postby La Sirena » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:19 pm

gatorcane wrote:What I keep thinking is as complex as this setup beyond 5 days is, the NAVGEM and CMC - normally unreliable models even in the medium-range have been basically showing the same quick recurve east of Florida and into the Bahamas even in the long-range from several days ago. Certainly the end-result cannot be as simple as what these models keep showing run after run. Usually you can be assured the storm is not going where these models take it....

Well, I'm not sure if that's a PRO or a CON lol! So, either they got a clue toward the recurve or it means the recurve won't happen!

Glass half full/half empty...tomato tomahto... :double:
0 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1023 Postby RL3AO » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:20 pm

SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


So if a future NHC cone is aiming for North Carolia and landfall is 24 hours away, they shouldn't be worried?
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1024 Postby Steve » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:21 pm

SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


Lmao
1 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1025 Postby SeGaBob » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:22 pm

RL3AO wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


So if a future NHC cone is aiming for North Carolia and landfall is 24 hours away, they shouldn't be worried?


Based on trends that won't happen.
1 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1026 Postby Steve » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:23 pm

Haha. I don't mean to be egging you on, but this is greatness.
0 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1027 Postby ronyan » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:24 pm

When do we get a new microwave pass?
0 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1028 Postby OntarioEggplant » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:25 pm

AJC3 wrote:Gang,

We (the admins and mods) have noticed the civility level on the forums has taken a nosedive since this morning. There is far too much bickering and sniping going on about each other's opinions. It's perfectly fine to disagree with someone on here, and have your own viewpoint (it helps A LOT if you have some solid reasoning behind it), but PLEASE...before you hit the enter key on your posts...ask yourself if you are addressing the other person the way that you would want to be addressed.

And if you find your post or posts are disappearing, it's because we're trying REALLY REALLY hard to keep the threads as clutter-free as possible. Remember, we do have a chat room you can go to if you want to be more informal, OT, etc.

Play nice, gang.

Thanks.


I agree except for within this thread as it is labeled a "Discussion" thread. Some banter is going to happen within it.
1 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1029 Postby SeGaBob » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:26 pm

If i turn out to be wrong I'll have no problem admitting it... East of Bermuda seems less likely now so I'll bust on that.
0 likes   

Zanthe
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 149
Age: 30
Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 9:26 pm
Location: New Castle, PA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1030 Postby Zanthe » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:27 pm

SeGaBob wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


So if a future NHC cone is aiming for North Carolia and landfall is 24 hours away, they shouldn't be worried?


Based on trends that won't happen.


I would imagine people would jump on you -- You're actually endangering people's lives! There are a lot of people who don't understand the weather as much as others who come to this forum to get advice, and seeing your post could lull them into a false sense of security. Don't bother mentioning why you think that, don't add any evidence, just post that the east coast shouldn't worry? Well who are you? When there are tons of pro mets saying to monitor this, then you should keep an eye out regardless of where you live, not telling people that there's no chance that their lives might be in danger. When all is said and done you could very well be right, but my god, were over a week out. Don't be irresponsible like that.
3 likes   
I'm no expert, everything I say should be taken with a large amount of salt. I could easily be very, very wrong.
~Zanthe Go Coyotes~

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1031 Postby Bocadude85 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:28 pm

SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


Umm the models shifted east a few days ago and had this going over DR and have now shifted WEST of Hispaniola, so you are already wrong.
2 likes   

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1032 Postby drewschmaltz » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:29 pm

RL3AO wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


So if a future NHC cone is aiming for North Carolia and landfall is 24 hours away, they shouldn't be worried?


[sarcasm] How in the world could the NHC cone be aiming at NC? I thought SeGaBob was rather clear when he said that "when models shift east there's no going back" and "those are the facts"

Your hypothetical is ridiculous. Utterly impossible.

Although, this is totally at odds with Bones2016's swollen foot. [/sarcasm]

I am going to contribute to this forum by tracking errors in long range forecasts and analyze the merit of these and other hypothesis. If anyone has a resource that has information and/or data that could help me, please show me the way.
Last edited by drewschmaltz on Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:34 pm, edited 5 times in total.
1 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7183
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1033 Postby jlauderdal » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:30 pm

ronyan wrote:When do we get a new microwave pass?
we have recon, radar and surface obs
0 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1034 Postby SeGaBob » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:32 pm

I should've worded that better...East then west then back east is what I meant.
And I said I wouldn't be worried but other people can if they want.
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1035 Postby floridasun78 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:33 pm

SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...

you putting your self hot water by saying that with other member storm2k
1 likes   

User avatar
mcheer23
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 436
Age: 32
Joined: Sun Jun 24, 2012 8:24 pm
Location: Sugar Land, Texas

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1036 Postby mcheer23 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:35 pm

AJC3 wrote:Gang,

We (the admins and mods) have noticed the civility level on the forums has taken a nosedive since this morning. There is far too much bickering and sniping going on about each other's opinions. It's perfectly fine to disagree with someone on here, and have your own viewpoint (it helps A LOT if you have some solid reasoning behind it), but PLEASE...before you hit the enter key on your posts...ask yourself if you are addressing the other person the way that you would want to be addressed.

And if you find your post or posts are disappearing, it's because we're trying REALLY REALLY hard to keep the threads as clutter-free as possible. Remember, we do have a chat room you can go to if you want to be more informal, OT, etc.

Play nice, gang.

Thanks.


How is "Im on #TeamGulf" clutter...?
0 likes   

Ken711
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1074
Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 12:48 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1037 Postby Ken711 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:41 pm

SeGaBob wrote:
RL3AO wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


So if a future NHC cone is aiming for North Carolia and landfall is 24 hours away, they shouldn't be worried?


Based on trends that won't happen.


Trends that far out? I still believe a NC/VA landfall is a strong possibility.
0 likes   

User avatar
La Sirena
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 307
Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 4:02 pm
Location: Formerly of the Keys, back home in East TN

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1038 Postby La Sirena » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:48 pm

mcheer23 wrote:
AJC3 wrote:Gang,

We (the admins and mods) have noticed the civility level on the forums has taken a nosedive since this morning. There is far too much bickering and sniping going on about each other's opinions. It's perfectly fine to disagree with someone on here, and have your own viewpoint (it helps A LOT if you have some solid reasoning behind it), but PLEASE...before you hit the enter key on your posts...ask yourself if you are addressing the other person the way that you would want to be addressed.

And if you find your post or posts are disappearing, it's because we're trying REALLY REALLY hard to keep the threads as clutter-free as possible. Remember, we do have a chat room you can go to if you want to be more informal, OT, etc.

Play nice, gang.

Thanks.


How is "Im on #TeamGulf" clutter...?


Not to speak for them, but I believe the idea is to keep the MODEL thread strictly academic with model images and discussion purely focused on scientific questions and discussion regarding models.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1039 Postby SeGaBob » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:49 pm

SeGaBob wrote:I wouldn't be worried anywhere on the East Coast. When models shift east there's no going back. I don't care if it's still a week out or 1 day out those are the facts. People might jump on me over this...


Added the disclaimer on that post so there won't be any more misunderstandings.
Last edited by SeGaBob on Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Windspeed
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 129
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 11:38 am

Re: RE: Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Tropical Storm - Discussion

#1040 Postby Windspeed » Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:50 pm

SeGaBob wrote:I should've worded that better...East then west then back east is what I meant.
And I said I wouldn't be worried but other people can if they want.

The models are resolving/dealing with upper cut off features that haven't even developed. It's not as if we have a set-point-match trough digging through the GOM on every single run in the 150+ hour range on the more proficient model groupings. This is a situation that warrants a lower degree of confidence even more so than typical 5-7 day trends so be wise and don't expect any decent degree of verification this far out, much less make bold claims. You're more likely wrong, even if you're basing your opinion on more common or typical model trends on past tropical systems.

Again, key point, until upper cutoff feature actually develops, we're in a higher degree of long term error. Each run may resolve a particular feature in a different location or that feature may not even resolve at all. In this case, a large ULL over the GOM with respect to greater heights to the east. Models are handling that and some aren't even resolving it at all. Way too early right now to know anything regardless, but in this case, even more so.
Last edited by Windspeed on Wed Sep 28, 2016 8:50 pm, edited 3 times in total.
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests