ATL: BONNIE - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- northjaxpro
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
- Location: Jacksonville, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Latest shear analysis clearly shows that huge drop off in shear over the Gulf Stream just off the Southeast U.S. Atlantic Coast. Once 91L gets into that region by tomorrow evening, it should really start to organize. The only potential impedient with this system is the large amount of dry air over the Southeast CONUS, which possibly could get entrained into potential Bonnie this weekend.
![Image](http://tropic.ssec.wisc.edu/real-time/atlantic/winds/wg8shrZ.GIF)
0 likes
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
________________________________________________________________________________________
Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
the drop off in shear is this getting underneath the upper low
Of course, that is what happened with Alex
Of course, that is what happened with Alex
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Simulated satellite from HWRF
![Image](http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/hwrf/2016052612/hwrf_goes4_91L_13.png)
![Image](http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/hwrf/2016052612/hwrf_goes4_91L_13.png)
Last edited by tarheelprogrammer on Thu May 26, 2016 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Alyono wrote:the drop off in shear is this getting underneath the upper low
Of course, that is what happened with Alex
Conditions look pretty solid (for late May at least) over the next 72 hours. The lack of shear should limit the impact of the drier continental air. SSTs get a touch low but maybe being under the upper low will help offset that.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
RL3AO wrote:^^^
Simulated IR satellite not radar
Sorry lol cannot believe I did that but corrected.
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
tarheelprogrammer wrote:RL3AO wrote:^^^
Simulated IR satellite not radar
Sorry lol cannot believe I did that but corrected.
No worries!
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:11 pm
- Location: Southport, NC
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
fci wrote:With all due respect; I think people can safely presume the Jacksonville would mean Florida not North Carolina.
The most populated city in Florida with over 1 million people versus the 14th most populated city in North Carolina with about 70,000 people or so
With all do respect; I don't think population size has a diddly squat of bearing on which Jacksonville people are talking about. Especially when you are discussing a tropical system and direction it will travel and potentially landfall.
0 likes
Diana X2 (look it up), Bertha, Fran, Bonnie, Floyd, Dennis, Charley, Ophelia, Ernesto, Irene, Matthew, And Florence
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Is that an upper level low centered further SW over the Bahamas?
There is a circulation there that can be seen in the WV imagery.
Might keep this little system under shear if it is an ULL.
There is a circulation there that can be seen in the WV imagery.
Might keep this little system under shear if it is an ULL.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Nimbus wrote:Is that an upper level low centered further SW over the Bahamas?
There is a circulation there that can be seen in the WV imagery.
Might keep this little system under shear if it is an ULL.
I seen that earlier as well. Could be one but do models show it?
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- TheStormExpert
- Category 5
- Posts: 8487
- Age: 30
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
- Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Simulated satellite from HWRF
Eye-like feature, hmmm...
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
WilmingtonSandbar wrote:fci wrote:With all due respect; I think people can safely presume the Jacksonville would mean Florida not North Carolina.
The most populated city in Florida with over 1 million people versus the 14th most populated city in North Carolina with about 70,000 people or so
With all do respect; I don't think population size has a diddly squat of bearing on which Jacksonville people are talking about. Especially when you are discussing a tropical system and direction it will travel and potentially landfall.
No offense as I understand your point and actually know where both Jacksonville, NC and Wilmington, NC are. But if someone is referencing Tampa and Ft. Lauderdale and wants to know "How the NE portion of the state is going to handle tropical situations, it's pretty clear. Having said that, you guys look to have some action in a few days. I'm interested to see if the NAM and/or GFS start upping the rainfall totals south of the OBX in the next couple of runs. NAM 18Z precip total is running now. It was giving 1.5/1.75 through 4 days as of the 12z run, and the GFS sort of puts more moisture north and south of the Southern Coast of NC.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 37143
- Age: 35
- Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
- Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Simulated satellite from HWRF
![roflmao :roflmao:](./images/smilies/r.gif)
That is all
0 likes
#neversummer
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
It seems we're in the clear now. (mostly) Any chance we get some outer bands at least?
NOT a forecast just my thoughts.
NOT a forecast just my thoughts.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
- Location: Nags Head, NC
- Contact:
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Come to the Outer Banks where the weather will be fine. Myrtle Beach not so much. Doesn't matter to me though. I"ll be vacationing in the mountains of Pa. The rest of the east coast will be here (one of the reasons I'm leaving).
0 likes
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
So the HWRF has a Hugo-like depiction over SC. Meanwhile the sea isn't fit to fall in (temp wise) either side of the Gulf stream. looks like low 70's. Count me as a skeptic (as usual) on the HWRF.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
Brent wrote:tarheelprogrammer wrote:Simulated satellite from HWRF
That is all
lol
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
psyclone wrote:So the HWRF has a Hugo-like depiction over SC. Meanwhile the sea isn't fit to fall in (temp wise) either side of the Gulf stream. looks like low 70's. Count me as a skeptic (as usual) on the HWRF.
lol no doubt even I am as well just thought I would post it to cheer everyone up
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Admin
- Posts: 19182
- Age: 60
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
- Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion
Let's stick to 91L please, thanks.
0 likes
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models
RL3AO wrote:Alyono wrote:the drop off in shear is this getting underneath the upper low
Of course, that is what happened with Alex
Conditions look pretty solid (for late May at least) over the next 72 hours. The lack of shear should limit the impact of the drier continental air. SSTs get a touch low but maybe being under the upper low will help offset that.
exactly right. SSTs in the 60s can be plenty warm for development under an upper low due to the cold tropopause heights. Now, I do not expect the tropopause to be THAT cold given this is MAY in the SW Atlantic. However, there could be a period of quick intensification over the Gulfstream
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest