ATL: BONNIE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#121 Postby northjaxpro » Thu May 26, 2016 2:15 pm

Latest shear analysis clearly shows that huge drop off in shear over the Gulf Stream just off the Southeast U.S. Atlantic Coast. Once 91L gets into that region by tomorrow evening, it should really start to organize. The only potential impedient with this system is the large amount of dry air over the Southeast CONUS, which possibly could get entrained into potential Bonnie this weekend.

Image
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#122 Postby Alyono » Thu May 26, 2016 2:37 pm

the drop off in shear is this getting underneath the upper low

Of course, that is what happened with Alex
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#123 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Thu May 26, 2016 2:41 pm

Simulated satellite from HWRF

Image
Last edited by tarheelprogrammer on Thu May 26, 2016 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#124 Postby RL3AO » Thu May 26, 2016 2:43 pm

^^^

Simulated IR satellite not radar
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#125 Postby RL3AO » Thu May 26, 2016 2:46 pm

Alyono wrote:the drop off in shear is this getting underneath the upper low

Of course, that is what happened with Alex


Conditions look pretty solid (for late May at least) over the next 72 hours. The lack of shear should limit the impact of the drier continental air. SSTs get a touch low but maybe being under the upper low will help offset that.
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#126 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Thu May 26, 2016 2:46 pm

RL3AO wrote:^^^

Simulated IR satellite not radar


Sorry lol cannot believe I did that but corrected.
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#127 Postby RL3AO » Thu May 26, 2016 2:50 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:
RL3AO wrote:^^^

Simulated IR satellite not radar


Sorry lol cannot believe I did that but corrected.


No worries!
0 likes   

WilmingtonSandbar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 503
Joined: Sun Aug 29, 2010 12:11 pm
Location: Southport, NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#128 Postby WilmingtonSandbar » Thu May 26, 2016 3:01 pm

fci wrote:With all due respect; I think people can safely presume the Jacksonville would mean Florida not North Carolina.
The most populated city in Florida with over 1 million people versus the 14th most populated city in North Carolina with about 70,000 people or so



With all do respect; I don't think population size has a diddly squat of bearing on which Jacksonville people are talking about. Especially when you are discussing a tropical system and direction it will travel and potentially landfall.
0 likes   
Diana X2 (look it up), Bertha, Fran, Bonnie, Floyd, Dennis, Charley, Ophelia, Ernesto, Irene, Matthew, And Florence

User avatar
Nimbus
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4933
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 10:54 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#129 Postby Nimbus » Thu May 26, 2016 3:15 pm

Is that an upper level low centered further SW over the Bahamas?
There is a circulation there that can be seen in the WV imagery.
Might keep this little system under shear if it is an ULL.
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#130 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Thu May 26, 2016 3:18 pm

Nimbus wrote:Is that an upper level low centered further SW over the Bahamas?
There is a circulation there that can be seen in the WV imagery.
Might keep this little system under shear if it is an ULL.


I seen that earlier as well. Could be one but do models show it?
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
TheStormExpert
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8487
Age: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 5:38 pm
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#131 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu May 26, 2016 3:24 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:Simulated satellite from HWRF

Image

Eye-like feature, hmmm...
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by storm2k.org.

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8610
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#132 Postby Steve » Thu May 26, 2016 3:24 pm

WilmingtonSandbar wrote:
fci wrote:With all due respect; I think people can safely presume the Jacksonville would mean Florida not North Carolina.
The most populated city in Florida with over 1 million people versus the 14th most populated city in North Carolina with about 70,000 people or so



With all do respect; I don't think population size has a diddly squat of bearing on which Jacksonville people are talking about. Especially when you are discussing a tropical system and direction it will travel and potentially landfall.


No offense as I understand your point and actually know where both Jacksonville, NC and Wilmington, NC are. But if someone is referencing Tampa and Ft. Lauderdale and wants to know "How the NE portion of the state is going to handle tropical situations, it's pretty clear. Having said that, you guys look to have some action in a few days. I'm interested to see if the NAM and/or GFS start upping the rainfall totals south of the OBX in the next couple of runs. NAM 18Z precip total is running now. It was giving 1.5/1.75 through 4 days as of the 12z run, and the GFS sort of puts more moisture north and south of the Southern Coast of NC.
0 likes   

Brent
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 37143
Age: 35
Joined: Sun May 16, 2004 10:30 pm
Location: Tulsa Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#133 Postby Brent » Thu May 26, 2016 3:28 pm

tarheelprogrammer wrote:Simulated satellite from HWRF

Image


:roflmao:

That is all
0 likes   
#neversummer

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#134 Postby SeGaBob » Thu May 26, 2016 3:33 pm

It seems we're in the clear now. (mostly) Any chance we get some outer bands at least?


NOT a forecast just my thoughts.
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1706
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#135 Postby OuterBanker » Thu May 26, 2016 3:42 pm

Come to the Outer Banks where the weather will be fine. Myrtle Beach not so much. Doesn't matter to me though. I"ll be vacationing in the mountains of Pa. The rest of the east coast will be here (one of the reasons I'm leaving).
0 likes   

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4510
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#136 Postby psyclone » Thu May 26, 2016 3:45 pm

So the HWRF has a Hugo-like depiction over SC. Meanwhile the sea isn't fit to fall in (temp wise) either side of the Gulf stream. looks like low 70's. Count me as a skeptic (as usual) on the HWRF.
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#137 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Thu May 26, 2016 3:48 pm

Brent wrote:
tarheelprogrammer wrote:Simulated satellite from HWRF

Image


:roflmao:

That is all


lol :lol:
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#138 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Thu May 26, 2016 3:49 pm

psyclone wrote:So the HWRF has a Hugo-like depiction over SC. Meanwhile the sea isn't fit to fall in (temp wise) either side of the Gulf stream. looks like low 70's. Count me as a skeptic (as usual) on the HWRF.


lol no doubt even I am as well just thought I would post it to cheer everyone up :wink:
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 19182
Age: 60
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Discussion

#139 Postby tolakram » Thu May 26, 2016 3:58 pm

Let's stick to 91L please, thanks.
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Models

#140 Postby Alyono » Thu May 26, 2016 4:29 pm

RL3AO wrote:
Alyono wrote:the drop off in shear is this getting underneath the upper low

Of course, that is what happened with Alex


Conditions look pretty solid (for late May at least) over the next 72 hours. The lack of shear should limit the impact of the drier continental air. SSTs get a touch low but maybe being under the upper low will help offset that.


exactly right. SSTs in the 60s can be plenty warm for development under an upper low due to the cold tropopause heights. Now, I do not expect the tropopause to be THAT cold given this is MAY in the SW Atlantic. However, there could be a period of quick intensification over the Gulfstream
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest