ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
wxmann_91
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 8013
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2005 2:49 pm
Location: Southern California
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1541 Postby wxmann_91 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:33 pm

TropicalAnalystwx13 wrote:If NHC thinks this is only going to intensify 15-20kt over 4 days, I have some oceanfront property in Switzerland to sell them. The storm should only gradually intensify through tomorrow, but rapid intensification is a distinct possibility thereafter. There's a reason the GFS/ECMWF/HWRF all have a Category 4 hurricane. This happened with Gaston too.


It might be a CYA thing... if this RI then NHC can always point to the models as reasons for their conservative forecasts. If however Matthew struggles and they forecast Cat 4 without model support, they're going to be in some hot water.
2 likes   

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16166
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1542 Postby Yellow Evan » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:34 pm

NHC IMO is giving too much weight to SHIPS/LGEM, which don't seem to seem to show the storm responding from warm waters.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1543 Postby Alyono » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:34 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:
CourierPR wrote:
ThetaE wrote:The timing complexities Mark and Levi were hinting at have to do with a number of things. Most importantly, it's not just about how quickly Matthew moves but how quickly the ridge builds back in. If the ridge builds in quickly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go more westward. If the ridge builds in slowly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go further east. The G-IV plane was collecting data on exactly this ridge, so hopefully the 00z models will resolve its evolution better, and reduce the modeling issue to simply one of a variance in Matthew's speed.


Someone posted on another forum that Chief Meteorologist Steve Weagle of WPTV in W. Palm Beach is reporting that samplings indicate the Bermuda High is stronger than indicated by the models and the high northeast of Cuba is also stronger.


Interesting...curious how he would know this information ?


the dropsonde data can be compared to the model forecasts
0 likes   

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1544 Postby sma10 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:35 pm

CourierPR wrote:
ThetaE wrote:The timing complexities Mark and Levi were hinting at have to do with a number of things. Most importantly, it's not just about how quickly Matthew moves but how quickly the ridge builds back in. If the ridge builds in quickly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go more westward. If the ridge builds in slowly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go further east. The G-IV plane was collecting data on exactly this ridge, so hopefully the 00z models will resolve its evolution better, and reduce the modeling issue to simply one of a variance in Matthew's speed.


Someone posted on another forum that Chief Meteorologist Steve Weagle of WPTV in W. Palm Beach is reporting that samplings indicate the Bermuda High is stronger than indicated by the models and the high northeast of Cuba is also stronger.


This is interesting information however it didn't bear out in the 0z Nam which shifted significantly to the NE, suggesting that the high is not stronger. Or is the Nam just too krappy a model?
0 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1545 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:38 pm

For those curious, I posted 00Z GFS initialization compared to forecasts from the 12Z and 18Z forecasts for 500 mb height.
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1546 Postby floridasun78 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:39 pm

i want see what my weather from wfor say but i have wait for boring post game dolphins end i let you know soon
0 likes   

floridasun78
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3755
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 10:16 pm
Location: miami fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1547 Postby floridasun78 » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:40 pm

Too early to tell. I wouldn’t take any bets on it either coming here or not coming here……
that from Setzer, Craig
0 likes   

ThetaE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:50 pm
Location: Boston

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1548 Postby ThetaE » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:42 pm

sma10 wrote:
CourierPR wrote:
ThetaE wrote:The timing complexities Mark and Levi were hinting at have to do with a number of things. Most importantly, it's not just about how quickly Matthew moves but how quickly the ridge builds back in. If the ridge builds in quickly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go more westward. If the ridge builds in slowly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go further east. The G-IV plane was collecting data on exactly this ridge, so hopefully the 00z models will resolve its evolution better, and reduce the modeling issue to simply one of a variance in Matthew's speed.


Someone posted on another forum that Chief Meteorologist Steve Weagle of WPTV in W. Palm Beach is reporting that samplings indicate the Bermuda High is stronger than indicated by the models and the high northeast of Cuba is also stronger.


This is interesting information however it didn't bear out in the 0z Nam which shifted significantly to the NE, suggesting that the high is not stronger. Or is the Nam just too krappy a model?


Lol, it's probably the NAM; it shouldn't really be used for tropical disturbances, because it wasn't designed for them. Maybe if you want to look at the evolution of some approaching trough or ridge you could use it, but never for a tropical cyclone's track/intensity.
0 likes   
I'm a busy grad student, not a professional forecaster. Please refer to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts.

otowntiger
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1921
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 7:06 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1549 Postby otowntiger » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:44 pm

CourierPR wrote:
ThetaE wrote:The timing complexities Mark and Levi were hinting at have to do with a number of things. Most importantly, it's not just about how quickly Matthew moves but how quickly the ridge builds back in. If the ridge builds in quickly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go more westward. If the ridge builds in slowly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go further east. The G-IV plane was collecting data on exactly this ridge, so hopefully the 00z models will resolve its evolution better, and reduce the modeling issue to simply one of a variance in Matthew's speed.


Someone posted on another forum that Chief Meteorologist Steve Weagle of WPTV in W. Palm Beach is reporting that samplings indicate the Bermuda High is stronger than indicated by the models and the high northeast of Cuba is also stronger.

WFTV (Orlando) Chief Met. Tom Terry said the same exact thing but said it may only potentially result in a slight west shift. In my opinion this storm will stay well east of Florida and the rest of the CONUS.
0 likes   

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1550 Postby fci » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:45 pm

CourierPR wrote:
ThetaE wrote:The timing complexities Mark and Levi were hinting at have to do with a number of things. Most importantly, it's not just about how quickly Matthew moves but how quickly the ridge builds back in. If the ridge builds in quickly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go more westward. If the ridge builds in slowly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go further east. The G-IV plane was collecting data on exactly this ridge, so hopefully the 00z models will resolve its evolution better, and reduce the modeling issue to simply one of a variance in Matthew's speed.


Someone posted on another forum that Chief Meteorologist Steve Weagle of WPTV in W. Palm Beach is reporting that samplings indicate the Bermuda High is stronger than indicated by the models and the high northeast of Cuba is also stronger.


I saw his report and he said that the track might nudge just a little bit West but not enough to make a big difference for us here in South Florida.
Of course he added the correct caveat to follow the advisories.
The work he does and his associates do; is excellent. Facebook live updates........ he is a good one.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1551 Postby fci » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:46 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:
CourierPR wrote:
ThetaE wrote:The timing complexities Mark and Levi were hinting at have to do with a number of things. Most importantly, it's not just about how quickly Matthew moves but how quickly the ridge builds back in. If the ridge builds in quickly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go more westward. If the ridge builds in slowly compared to Matthew's location/speed, he will go further east. The G-IV plane was collecting data on exactly this ridge, so hopefully the 00z models will resolve its evolution better, and reduce the modeling issue to simply one of a variance in Matthew's speed.


Someone posted on another forum that Chief Meteorologist Steve Weagle of WPTV in W. Palm Beach is reporting that samplings indicate the Bermuda High is stronger than indicated by the models and the high northeast of Cuba is also stronger.


Interesting...curious how he would know this information ?


He referred to data from the Gulfstreams
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

User avatar
Yellow Evan
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 16166
Age: 27
Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Henderson, Nevada/Honolulu, HI
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1552 Postby Yellow Evan » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:55 pm

Seems to be quickly transitioning from a shear pattern to a CDO-dominant hurricane.
1 likes   

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1553 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Sep 29, 2016 10:56 pm

Yellow Evan wrote:Seems to be quickly transitioning from a shear pattern to a CDO-dominant hurricane.

Was just about to say pretty much this. The convection is no longer pulsing and is now clearly wrapping up into the center.

Image
0 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

User avatar
fci
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 3324
Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2004 10:29 am
Location: Lake Worth, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1554 Postby fci » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:00 pm

1900hurricane wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:Seems to be quickly transitioning from a shear pattern to a CDO-dominant hurricane.

Was just about to say pretty much this. The convection is no longer pulsing and is now clearly wrapping up into the center.

Image


What is that area southeast of the actual storm separated by a little alleyway?
Is that normal?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1555 Postby sponger » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:01 pm

Banding coming on.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
1900hurricane
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 6059
Age: 34
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
Location: Houston, TX
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1556 Postby 1900hurricane » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:01 pm

fci wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:
Yellow Evan wrote:Seems to be quickly transitioning from a shear pattern to a CDO-dominant hurricane.

Was just about to say pretty much this. The convection is no longer pulsing and is now clearly wrapping up into the center.

Image


What is that area southeast of the actual storm separated by a little alleyway?
Is that normal?

It's just a convective burst in a confluent band, nothing unusual.
2 likes   
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.

Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/

NotoSans
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1380
Age: 25
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2015 1:15 am
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1557 Postby NotoSans » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:01 pm

I am still not leaning towards the NHC intensity forecast, which shows only a 5-kt intensification within the next 24 hours. With an inner core established I would expect at least gradual development in the near term.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to RSMC and NWS products.

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1558 Postby sponger » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 pm

Certainly appears to continue to gradually strengthen.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1559 Postby Hurricaneman » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:04 pm

1900hurricane wrote:
fci wrote:
1900hurricane wrote:Was just about to say pretty much this. The convection is no longer pulsing and is now clearly wrapping up into the center.

Image


What is that area southeast of the actual storm separated by a little alleyway?
Is that normal?

It's just a convective burst in a confluent band, nothing unusual.


looks like an eye is trying to show up
0 likes   

User avatar
sponger
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1620
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 11:26 am
Location: St Augustine

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#1560 Postby sponger » Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:06 pm

Sure is!
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests