ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15979
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#161 Postby Kingarabian » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:48 am

Early to say, but it looks like the models are indeed trending east. This run by the GFS will not clear Florida though. If the GFS is to follow the Euro, it usually does it in a gradual fashion. So the 12z suite will be very telling.
Last edited by Kingarabian on Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#162 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:48 am

USTropics wrote:Looks like a SW Florida landfall coming up, maybe up the coast? 946 mbs, 264 hours, take it with a grain of salt.

Image

Image


trending east..this thing will avoid the USA on this trend
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#163 Postby KWT » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:48 am

Big hit on the Keys this run!

Florida going to get hard on this run, maybe up the west coast of Florida.

PS, I would NOT call one run a trend....its closer to the ensembles BUT do not get carried away at this stage...especially as models tend to be a little quick on going north this far out....
Last edited by KWT on Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

cajunwx
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 5:52 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#164 Postby cajunwx » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:49 am

One run isn't a trend.
0 likes   

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#165 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:49 am

Landfall near Fort Myers, heading north up the coast:

Image

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15979
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#166 Postby Kingarabian » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:51 am

cajunwx wrote:One run isn't a trend.


The four major global models have shifted east. I would say that's a trend.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#167 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:52 am

Trend at 240 hours and still in the Gulf? Lol
0 likes   
Michael

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#168 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:52 am

A few hundred miles east or west between one run and the next at 10-11 days out is a drop in the bucket, and hardly a trend. For all we know, more of the ensembles could shift west. Remember, this is just ONE member.
0 likes   
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#169 Postby Alyono » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:54 am

looks like a final landfall in Toronto, similar to Hazel in that aspect
0 likes   

cajunwx
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 5:52 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#170 Postby cajunwx » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:55 am

Kingarabian wrote:
cajunwx wrote:One run isn't a trend.


The four major global models have shifted east. I would say that's a trend.


For one run.... 2 weeks away... ok.
0 likes   

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#171 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:58 am

Gfs status quo at 240 hours...Euro Ensembles shifted west...and we are talking trend at 240 plus hours?
0 likes   
Michael

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#172 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:58 am

Ivanhater wrote:Trend at 240 hours and still in the Gulf? Lol


I don't see a trend at all, I see two totally different upper level snyoptics by both models (the operational GFS and ECMWF). The 06z and 00z GFS runs are nearly identical, the position of the high is just further north in the long range, allowing a more northward motion for 97L. The GFS is still kicking that cut off low out. The 00z ECMWF fails to even develop a ridge off the EC, instead is has a blocked cut off low that lingers from 120 hours through 240 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
GCANE
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 11496
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:03 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#173 Postby GCANE » Sun Sep 25, 2016 5:59 am

GFS 355K PV
Continues to show very favorable UL conditions for deep intensification in the GOM.
A trough is forecast to develop to its north and sweep east as it enters the GOM.
It will take the "path of least resistance" and follow into the trough.
So, the way I read it at this point, if it gets anywhere in the mid GOM, it will start a recurve and west coast of FL would be likely landfall.
Will continue to watch the forecast if this feature persists.

Image

Image
Last edited by GCANE on Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

jlauderdal
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 7182
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:46 am
Location: NE Fort Lauderdale
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#174 Postby jlauderdal » Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:01 am

cajunwx wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:
cajunwx wrote:One run isn't a trend.


The four major global models have shifted east. I would say that's a trend.


For one run.... 2 weeks away... ok.


you guys/gals maybe looking at the one run this morning but go back and look where the models were yesterday and the day before...you are correct that one run isnt a trend so dont look at one run, i dont
0 likes   

User avatar
brunota2003
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9476
Age: 34
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2005 9:56 pm
Location: Stanton, KY...formerly Havelock, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#175 Postby brunota2003 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:03 am

I noticed on the TCHP maps that once you get into the GOM, the TCHP is nearly nonexistent. I wonder how that will play into things, and impact the intensity of 97L (assuming it develops and moves into the Gulf). Granted, we are talking ~10 days out, which could allow for some rebuilding of the heat.
0 likes   
Just a small town southern boy helping other humans.

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15979
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#176 Postby Kingarabian » Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:04 am

Ivanhater wrote:Gfs status quo at 240 hours...Euro Ensembles shifted west...and we are talking trend at 240 plus hours?


00z EPS control on weatherbell shows a recurve east of Florida compared to the 12z EPS which shows a landfall over the Yucatan.
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#177 Postby KWT » Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:08 am

Kingarabian wrote:
Ivanhater wrote:Gfs status quo at 240 hours...Euro Ensembles shifted west...and we are talking trend at 240 plus hours?


00z EPS control on weatherbell shows a recurve east of Florida compared to the 12z EPS which shows a landfall over the Yucatan.


Which is crazy and tells you you really shouldn't pay attention to that, to shift 1000 miles in 12hrs of the models says that you may as well not pay it any credence.

Just remember models tend to go north too early and break down ridges too quickly. I give an eastern solution MORE credence than say in August but this thing is WAY south so its going to take a heck of a weakness for it to bend like it does on the CMC.

Also remember the CMC is too far north to start with and develops the wrong area so that may not be a run to pay that much attention to.

Personally I'm liking the 06z GFS guidence, I think that is in the right ballpark.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
Ivanhater
Storm2k Moderator
Storm2k Moderator
Posts: 11160
Age: 38
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 8:25 am
Location: Pensacola

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#178 Postby Ivanhater » Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:09 am

USTropics wrote:Well let's add even more confusion to the models, the ECMWF ensembles look to be significantly SW of the operational.

Image

Ensembles also show ridging off the EC at 240 hours. Totally disagreeing with the operational.

Image


00Z Euro Ensembles. .shift west
0 likes   
Michael

USTropics
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 2649
Joined: Sun Aug 12, 2007 3:45 am
Location: Florida State University

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#179 Postby USTropics » Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:15 am

06z GFS ensembles at 192 hours, pretty good agreement with the operational run so far:

Image
Last edited by USTropics on Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:16 am, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes   

cajunwx
Tropical Wave
Tropical Wave
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2014 5:52 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#180 Postby cajunwx » Sun Sep 25, 2016 6:15 am

jlauderdal wrote:
cajunwx wrote:
Kingarabian wrote:
The four major global models have shifted east. I would say that's a trend.


For one run.... 2 weeks away... ok.


you guys/gals maybe looking at the one run this morning but go back and look where the models were yesterday and the day before...you are correct that one run isnt a trend so dont look at one run, i dont


You can't pick and choose what to look at to fit your narrative of it heading towards you, the fact is there is no trend.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests