ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Wow. That is some of the most impressive RI I've seen in the Atlantic in quite some time.
0 likes
- 1900hurricane
- Category 5
- Posts: 6059
- Age: 34
- Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:04 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Not surprised about the lightning. IR temps on some of the overshoots in the NW eyewall are clearing -90*C.

0 likes
Contract Meteorologist. TAMU & MSST. Fiercely authentic, one of a kind. We are all given free will, so choose a life meant to be lived. We are the Masters of our own Stories.
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Opinions expressed are mine alone.
Follow me on Twitter at @1900hurricane : Read blogs at https://1900hurricane.wordpress.com/
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
sponger wrote:Not good for Jamaica!
it was never good for Jamaica. The forecast I issued last evening was 110 kts near eastern Jamaica. While I do not expect much more RI in the short term, as it approaches Jamaica, this may end up quite a bit stronger than the 110 kts I was forecasting
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 2:29 pm
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
How would a stronger system, say a cat 5, effect the ridging and potential track?
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 12:57 pm
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
This might actually be considered explosive deepening... I don't remember what the cutoff is between rapid and explosive. I guess I got my lightning question answered.
Kinda reminding me of Felix right now.

0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 34002
- Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
- Location: Deep South, for the first time!
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
txwatcher91 wrote:How would a stronger system, say a cat 5, effect the ridging and potential track?
Likely would go a bit farther west, more towards western Cuba and the Cayman Islands I would think?
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Alyono wrote:sponger wrote:Not good for Jamaica!
it was never good for Jamaica. The forecast I issued last evening was 110 kts near eastern Jamaica. While I do not expect much more RI in the short term, as it approaches Jamaica, this may end up quite a bit stronger than the 110 kts I was forecasting
Strong 3 0r 4 would be devastating.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- galaxy401
- Category 5
- Posts: 2419
- Age: 30
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 9:04 pm
- Location: Casa Grande, Arizona
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Going to bed, don't know what to expect with Matthew when I wake up. Won't be surprised to see a major then.
1 likes
Got my eyes on moving right into Hurricane Alley: Florida.
-
- Category 2
- Posts: 597
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:09 am
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Alyono wrote:sponger wrote:Not good for Jamaica!
it was never good for Jamaica. The forecast I issued last evening was 110 kts near eastern Jamaica. While I do not expect much more RI in the short term, as it approaches Jamaica, this may end up quite a bit stronger than the 110 kts I was forecasting
Ivan was the worst case scenario ever for Jamaica .. right front quad eyewall across the entire island as a cat 4
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Based on the satellite Matthew may be tapping into the shear to enhance the outflow on the western side. I remember Bertha in 2008 being another storm that did this, headed into 30kt shear, and instead of weakening repelled it and ended up a Cat 3 in a short period of time.


Six hour difference.


Six hour difference.
Last edited by Hammy on Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
1 likes
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:Alyono wrote:sponger wrote:Not good for Jamaica!
it was never good for Jamaica. The forecast I issued last evening was 110 kts near eastern Jamaica. While I do not expect much more RI in the short term, as it approaches Jamaica, this may end up quite a bit stronger than the 110 kts I was forecasting
Ivan was the worst case scenario ever for Jamaica .. right front quad eyewall across the entire island as a cat 4
Seems like yesterday!
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Aric Dunn wrote:Alyono wrote:sponger wrote:Not good for Jamaica!
it was never good for Jamaica. The forecast I issued last evening was 110 kts near eastern Jamaica. While I do not expect much more RI in the short term, as it approaches Jamaica, this may end up quite a bit stronger than the 110 kts I was forecasting
Ivan was the worst case scenario ever for Jamaica .. right front quad eyewall across the entire island as a cat 4
Damage was significantly less in Jamaica from Ivan than it was for Gilbert. The strongest winds stayed offshore an did not affect Kingston. same thing happened with Dean
Jamaica was incredibly lucky with those two storms. They were a combined 40 miles away from 2 cat 4s
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Alyono wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:Alyono wrote:
it was never good for Jamaica. The forecast I issued last evening was 110 kts near eastern Jamaica. While I do not expect much more RI in the short term, as it approaches Jamaica, this may end up quite a bit stronger than the 110 kts I was forecasting
Ivan was the worst case scenario ever for Jamaica .. right front quad eyewall across the entire island as a cat 4
Damage was significantly less in Jamaica from Ivan than it was for Gilbert. The strongest winds stayed offshore an did not affect Kingston. same thing happened with Dean
Jamaica was incredibly lucky with those two storms. They were a combined 40 miles away from 2 cat 4s
Gilbert was enormous! Held the record until Wilma for lowest pressure i believe.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 21238
- Age: 42
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
- Location: Ready for the Chase.
- Contact:
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
Alyono wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:Alyono wrote:
it was never good for Jamaica. The forecast I issued last evening was 110 kts near eastern Jamaica. While I do not expect much more RI in the short term, as it approaches Jamaica, this may end up quite a bit stronger than the 110 kts I was forecasting
Ivan was the worst case scenario ever for Jamaica .. right front quad eyewall across the entire island as a cat 4
Damage was significantly less in Jamaica from Ivan than it was for Gilbert. The strongest winds stayed offshore an did not affect Kingston. same thing happened with Dean
Jamaica was incredibly lucky with those two storms. They were a combined 40 miles away from 2 cat 4s
agreed
was just mentioning that ivans angle was worst case even though it was just far enough from kingston. this system "on present forecast" keeps right front offshore
0 likes
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask
Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
If there is nothing before... then just ask

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
CrazyC83 wrote:txwatcher91 wrote:How would a stronger system, say a cat 5, effect the ridging and potential track?
Likely would go a bit farther west, more towards western Cuba and the Cayman Islands I would think?
That would not be a good thing for Florida unless he turned NE after that
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
1 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
There was such intense convection wrapping around the center throughout the day that I'm not surprised this happened. What a difference 16 hrs makes, and I doubt this is finished intensifying.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion
South Florida may end up the error cone tomorrow. Track will definitely shift West with Euro and GFS in somewhat of a agreement, but they would wait until 5pm to pull SFL inside the dreaded cone at 5pm if future runs are in agreement. Not good at all. Stringer ridge, stronger storm, slower movement. I still think SFL will only be brushed but who knows what the next few days bring.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests