ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Yes the 12z GFS does look quite a bit further north than previous runs. Given we now have a center we will get a much better handle on where it is going.
With that being said, lets wait and see what the rest of the run does!
With that being said, lets wait and see what the rest of the run does!
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
SouthFLTropics wrote:Vinnland wrote:12z GFS running now
Is it just me or does it appear that the GFS initialized a hair too far north. Might be splitting hairs here but just looks that way to me.
I hadn't taken a close look to see yet so couldn't say but a couple times where i've seen that happen for a given model run, that same input also seemed to represent an incorrectly initialized forward motion as well. No doubt that accurate direction, speed of forward motion, and initialized COC might together impact that particular run's overall accuracy. That all said, it's possible that this 12Z GFS run might simply appear as a continuation of its past couple of runs. Just means that the 18Z or 0Z tonight might begin to appear slightly different, and possibly more accurately initialized?
0 likes
Andy D
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)
- SouthFLTropics
- Category 5
- Posts: 4236
- Age: 50
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
- Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
KWT wrote:Yes the 12z GFS does look quite a bit further north than previous runs. Given we now have a center we will get a much better handle on where it is going.
With that being said, lets wait and see what the rest of the run does!
I believe the 12z would have been initialized using the best track and not the actual center that recon found. They wouldn't have had time to use the recon finding I don't think.
0 likes
Fourth Generation Florida Native
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
I don't see this initialized too far north at all. It is virtually initialized at the same spot as 6Z.
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23691
- Age: 47
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
12Z GFS back to same 06Z position at 48 hours because it takes a SW dip.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Yeah GFS did start too far north, I'd estimate about 1 degree too far north, about the right speed though.
1 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
gatorcane wrote:12Z GFS back to same 06Z position at 48 hours because it takes a SW dip.
Stronger as well
0 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
SouthFLTropics wrote:KWT wrote:Yes the 12z GFS does look quite a bit further north than previous runs. Given we now have a center we will get a much better handle on where it is going.
With that being said, lets wait and see what the rest of the run does!
I believe the 12z would have been initialized using the best track and not the actual center that recon found. They wouldn't have had time to use the recon finding I don't think.
The correct recon center should be input for the 18Z run.
0 likes
- tarheelprogrammer
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
- Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Slightly further NE of 06z run at hour 54.
See here:
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=atl&pkg=z500a&runtime=2016092812&fh=54&xpos=0&ypos=200
See here:
http://www.tropicaltidbits.com/analysis/models/?model=gfs®ion=atl&pkg=z500a&runtime=2016092812&fh=54&xpos=0&ypos=200
0 likes
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
HurrMark wrote:I don't see this initialized too far north at all. It is virtually initialized at the same spot as 6Z.
There have been recent studies that have shown relocating a model vortex to the NHC initial position DEGRADES the forecast. It is one of the reasons why Joaquin busted by the MU last year. Had they not relocated the vortex, it would have shown an out to sea track
1 likes
- SouthFLTropics
- Category 5
- Posts: 4236
- Age: 50
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
- Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
The track differences on 12z versus 06z so far are probably negligible. I'm more interested in watching the 500mb pattern evolving. At 60 hours it looks like the ridge to the north may be expanding to the west a bit more than it did on 06z. Time will tell. Look for the turn around the 90 to 100 hour time frame.
0 likes
Fourth Generation Florida Native
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 6358
- Age: 62
- Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
- Location: Miramar Bch. FL
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
This run might catch Haiti, looks like the turn will be a shade further East.
0 likes
- MississippiWx
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 1699
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
GFS a good bit north and east of previous run. Last two runs have done this...eastward trend so far today from GFS. Doesn't mean the end result will be east, but certainly implies it.
1 likes
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- PTrackerLA
- Category 5
- Posts: 5277
- Age: 41
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
- Location: Lafayette, LA
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
Yep looks like the GFS west trend might have ended. Wouldn't be surprised to see this run miss the EC we will know soon.
1 likes
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
MississippiWx wrote:GFS a good bit north and east of previous run. Last two runs have done this...eastward trend so far today from GFS. Doesn't mean the end result will be east, but certainly implies it.
The "eastward trend" is both due to an incorrect initialization too far north and the slower movement. Otherwise this would be nearly identical to 00z.
0 likes
Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models
OntarioEggplant wrote:MississippiWx wrote:GFS a good bit north and east of previous run. Last two runs have done this...eastward trend so far today from GFS. Doesn't mean the end result will be east, but certainly implies it.
The "eastward trend" is both due to an incorrect initialization too far north and the slower movement. Otherwise this would be nearly identical to 00z.
see my post before. Do NOT touch the vortex position, you only mess everything up if you shift the vortex to the best track position
0 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest