ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1801 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:38 am

Yes the 12z GFS does look quite a bit further north than previous runs. Given we now have a center we will get a much better handle on where it is going.

With that being said, lets wait and see what the rest of the run does!
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

User avatar
chris_fit
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3222
Age: 42
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2003 11:58 pm
Location: Tampa Bay Area, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1802 Postby chris_fit » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:39 am

Like like a Southern component at 42 hours
0 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1803 Postby OntarioEggplant » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:40 am

Uh, SW dip through 42 hours?
0 likes   

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1804 Postby ronyan » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:40 am

It's very slightly further north guys through 36 hrs.
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5478
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1805 Postby chaser1 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:40 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:
Vinnland wrote:12z GFS running now


Is it just me or does it appear that the GFS initialized a hair too far north. Might be splitting hairs here but just looks that way to me.


I hadn't taken a close look to see yet so couldn't say but a couple times where i've seen that happen for a given model run, that same input also seemed to represent an incorrectly initialized forward motion as well. No doubt that accurate direction, speed of forward motion, and initialized COC might together impact that particular run's overall accuracy. That all said, it's possible that this 12Z GFS run might simply appear as a continuation of its past couple of runs. Just means that the 18Z or 0Z tonight might begin to appear slightly different, and possibly more accurately initialized?
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1806 Postby SouthFLTropics » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:41 am

KWT wrote:Yes the 12z GFS does look quite a bit further north than previous runs. Given we now have a center we will get a much better handle on where it is going.

With that being said, lets wait and see what the rest of the run does!


I believe the 12z would have been initialized using the best track and not the actual center that recon found. They wouldn't have had time to use the recon finding I don't think.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

HurrMark
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 769
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:18 pm
Location: Somerville, MA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1807 Postby HurrMark » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:41 am

I don't see this initialized too far north at all. It is virtually initialized at the same spot as 6Z.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1808 Postby gatorcane » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:41 am

12Z GFS back to same 06Z position at 48 hours because it takes a SW dip.
0 likes   

User avatar
KWT
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 31415
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 11:02 am
Location: UK!!!

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1809 Postby KWT » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:42 am

Yeah GFS did start too far north, I'd estimate about 1 degree too far north, about the right speed though.
1 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products

Hamanard
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 6:14 pm
Location: Skidaway Island, GA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1810 Postby Hamanard » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:43 am

gatorcane wrote:12Z GFS back to same 06Z position at 48 hours because it takes a SW dip.


Stronger as well
0 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1811 Postby OntarioEggplant » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:43 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:
KWT wrote:Yes the 12z GFS does look quite a bit further north than previous runs. Given we now have a center we will get a much better handle on where it is going.

With that being said, lets wait and see what the rest of the run does!


I believe the 12z would have been initialized using the best track and not the actual center that recon found. They wouldn't have had time to use the recon finding I don't think.


The correct recon center should be input for the 18Z run.
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1812 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:46 am

0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1813 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:47 am

HurrMark wrote:I don't see this initialized too far north at all. It is virtually initialized at the same spot as 6Z.


There have been recent studies that have shown relocating a model vortex to the NHC initial position DEGRADES the forecast. It is one of the reasons why Joaquin busted by the MU last year. Had they not relocated the vortex, it would have shown an out to sea track
1 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 50
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1814 Postby SouthFLTropics » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:50 am

The track differences on 12z versus 06z so far are probably negligible. I'm more interested in watching the 500mb pattern evolving. At 60 hours it looks like the ridge to the north may be expanding to the west a bit more than it did on 06z. Time will tell. Look for the turn around the 90 to 100 hour time frame.
0 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

srva80
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 38
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 6:58 am
Location: Houma, LA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1815 Postby srva80 » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:50 am

looks a tad slower this run as well
0 likes   

Dean4Storms
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6358
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 31, 2003 1:01 pm
Location: Miramar Bch. FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1816 Postby Dean4Storms » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:52 am

This run might catch Haiti, looks like the turn will be a shade further East.
0 likes   

User avatar
MississippiWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1699
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Hattiesburg, Mississippi

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1817 Postby MississippiWx » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:52 am

GFS a good bit north and east of previous run. Last two runs have done this...eastward trend so far today from GFS. Doesn't mean the end result will be east, but certainly implies it.
1 likes   
This post is not an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of MississippiWx and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org. For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
PTrackerLA
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5277
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 8:40 pm
Location: Lafayette, LA

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1818 Postby PTrackerLA » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:54 am

Yep looks like the GFS west trend might have ended. Wouldn't be surprised to see this run miss the EC we will know soon.
1 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1819 Postby OntarioEggplant » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:57 am

MississippiWx wrote:GFS a good bit north and east of previous run. Last two runs have done this...eastward trend so far today from GFS. Doesn't mean the end result will be east, but certainly implies it.


The "eastward trend" is both due to an incorrect initialization too far north and the slower movement. Otherwise this would be nearly identical to 00z.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Models

#1820 Postby Alyono » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:59 am

OntarioEggplant wrote:
MississippiWx wrote:GFS a good bit north and east of previous run. Last two runs have done this...eastward trend so far today from GFS. Doesn't mean the end result will be east, but certainly implies it.


The "eastward trend" is both due to an incorrect initialization too far north and the slower movement. Otherwise this would be nearly identical to 00z.


see my post before. Do NOT touch the vortex position, you only mess everything up if you shift the vortex to the best track position
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest