ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#281 Postby toad strangler » Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:54 am

12z GFS very Hazelesque
0 likes   

WeatherEmperor
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4806
Age: 41
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#282 Postby WeatherEmperor » Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:56 am

blp wrote:Keep in mind the Euro due North jump happened after 192hr truncation, less reliable portion. The Euro ensembles were further west. I think this run will switch again slightly more toward the ensembles.


What do u mean by 192hr truncation? Is that when the Euro's resolution goes to the lower resolution?


Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
0 likes   

SeGaBob

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#283 Postby SeGaBob » Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:57 am

stormreader wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:Better be careful here. Wild swings in models will burn you every time.

So true!


Except when they lock on to a recurve east of the U.S you can bank on it most of the time.
Last edited by SeGaBob on Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
4 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#284 Postby Bocadude85 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 11:59 am

SeGaBob wrote:
stormreader wrote:
GeneratorPower wrote:Better be careful here. Wild swings in models will burn you every time.

So true!


Except when they lock on to a recurve you can bank on it most of the time.


The models have been showing a recurve for many runs, the only difference is how far west the system gets before recurving.
1 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#285 Postby toad strangler » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:01 pm

Bocadude85 wrote:
SeGaBob wrote:
stormreader wrote:So true!


Except when they lock on to a recurve you can bank on it most of the time.


The models have been showing a recurve for many runs, the only difference is how far west the system gets before recurving.


Exactly.
0 likes   

User avatar
toad strangler
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4543
Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2013 3:09 pm
Location: Earth
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#286 Postby toad strangler » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:01 pm

Although the sudden due N turn is a new wrinkle to the recurve
0 likes   

User avatar
centuryv58
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 233
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:24 pm
Location: Southeast Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#287 Postby centuryv58 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:02 pm

toad strangler wrote:Although the sudden due N turn is a new wrinkle to the recurve


Looks a bit bogus, I agree.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#288 Postby Alyono » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:04 pm

What the models agree on is a hurricane near aruba moving very slowly. Massive flooding coming
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#289 Postby CrazyC83 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:04 pm

centuryv58 wrote:
toad strangler wrote:Although the sudden due N turn is a new wrinkle to the recurve


Looks a bit bogus, I agree.


If you look at the 500mb vorticity map it makes perfect sense though.
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#290 Postby tolakram » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:05 pm

Saying models lock onto something is kind of misunderstanding what's at play in my opinion. This isn't a typical trough situation but rather a cutoff low that the models are just now calculating will stick around for long enough to pull any hurricane north. I do think this is more complex than the typical situation so certainly worth keeping an eye on and not being surprised if there's some back and forth in the next few runs.
2 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#291 Postby OntarioEggplant » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:07 pm

Remember how the models shifted east of Florida with Hermine and how it never happened as Hermine kept moving further and further west?
0 likes   

User avatar
blp
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2840
Age: 46
Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 7:51 pm
Location: Miami, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#292 Postby blp » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:08 pm

That is why I think we should be focusing more on the ensembles than the op run if you are looking past 192hrs.
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

stormreader

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#293 Postby stormreader » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:11 pm

All interesting. But remember a ridge is forecast to be in place over the East US. That's the larger and more reliable part of the model forecast. Erosion of ridge is predicated on smaller scale feature ( cut-off low). Way, way too early to assume the truth of this feature in 5 days. I simply think we should look at this again in about 48 hrs (say Tues afternoon). At that point if models continue to make this forecast, then I think it becomes much more certain.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#294 Postby Bocadude85 » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:13 pm

tolakram wrote:Saying models lock onto something is kind of misunderstanding what's at play in my opinion. This isn't a typical trough situation but rather a cutoff low that the models are just now calculating will stick around for long enough to pull any hurricane north. I do think this is more complex than the typical situation so certainly worth keeping an eye on and not being surprised if there's some back and forth in the next few runs.


I agree completely. I think the models will continue to fluctuate a few hundred miles until settling in on the final outcome in a few days. I do see this as a significant threat to the Caribbean Islands and potentially Florida/Bahamas.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#295 Postby RL3AO » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:19 pm

Cutoff lows are very difficult to forecast in the 5 to 7 day range and that appears to be a major feature for the future track of this system. Probably means we have less confidence than normal in the 5 to 10 day range.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#296 Postby Hurricaneman » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:23 pm

It seems as the OP of the GFS is farthest south at 174 because its slower than the other ensembles

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service.
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#297 Postby gatorcane » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:24 pm

12Z NAVGEM moving WNW to NW at 180 hours:

Image
0 likes   

tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#298 Postby tolakram » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:26 pm

Pretty decent agreement.

Image
0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#299 Postby gatorcane » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:30 pm

at 228 hours way too close for comfort for South Florida, wouldn't take much of a shift west to put most of those ensembles right over South Florida.

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#300 Postby gatorcane » Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:34 pm

Also, note the group of ensembles south of Cuba that are slower and more SW that impact South Florida :uarrow:
Last edited by gatorcane on Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests