ATL: HERMINE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
tolakram
Admin
Admin
Posts: 20009
Age: 62
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 8:23 pm
Location: Florence, KY (name is Mark)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#341 Postby tolakram » Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:41 am

0 likes   
M a r k
- - - - -
Join us in chat: Storm2K Chatroom Invite. Android and IOS apps also available.

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. Posts are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K.org. For official information and forecasts, please refer to NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#342 Postby GeneratorPower » Mon Aug 22, 2016 6:44 am

ouragans wrote:
Blown Away wrote:Nice convection this morning... Maybe NHC raises short term development percentages at 8??

I think they will, and same for 5 days. This system has a nice circulation that maintained itself when there was no convection. 99L might even be classified before reaching the islands


For 99L to impact Florida with significant winds, it's going to have to reach TD or TS status before the southeastern Bahamas. If it waits to get a good foundation until the central Bahamas it will not have time before it hits land.
0 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1731
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion - 8 AM TWO=20%-50%

#343 Postby OuterBanker » Mon Aug 22, 2016 7:15 am

I think that the answer will be this.
Weaker and later development will mean the gulf scenario.
Earlier development and a stronger storm in the Bahamas will mean a southeast coast or out to sea.
Worse case will be a stall off the southeast coast in all that bathwater.

Jmho.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion - 8 AM TWO=20%-50%

#344 Postby Alyono » Mon Aug 22, 2016 7:26 am

OuterBanker wrote:I think that the answer will be this.
Weaker and later development will mean the gulf scenario.
Earlier development and a stronger storm in the Bahamas will mean a southeast coast or out to sea.
Worse case will be a stall off the southeast coast in all that bathwater.

Jmho.


Maybe not

Stronger may mean Gulf. Depends upon how deep the ridge is
0 likes   

User avatar
srainhoutx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6919
Age: 67
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Haywood County, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion - 8 AM TWO=20%-50%

#345 Postby srainhoutx » Mon Aug 22, 2016 7:46 am

Alyono wrote:
Maybe not

Stronger may mean Gulf. Depends upon how deep the ridge is


I tend to agree. The ECMWF and GFS Ensembles remain in fairly good agreement that the SE Ridge will be well established later this week throughout the weekend into early next week.
0 likes   
Carla/Alicia/Jerry(In The Eye)/Michelle/Charley/Ivan/Dennis/Katrina/Rita/Wilma/Ike/Harvey

Member: National Weather Association
Wx Infinity Forums
http://wxinfinity.com/index.php

Facebook.com/WeatherInfinity
Twitter @WeatherInfinity

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#346 Postby LarryWx » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:20 am

Note that 99L is getting more convection at around 50W (due to higher SST's?), which is where those runs of the GFS/GEFS of a couple of days ago that had it developing by the Lesser Antilles first had it start to develop. Of course, we know they now wait til near the Bahamas for development.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#347 Postby Weatherboy1 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:25 am

GeneratorPower wrote:
ouragans wrote:
Blown Away wrote:Nice convection this morning... Maybe NHC raises short term development percentages at 8??

I think they will, and same for 5 days. This system has a nice circulation that maintained itself when there was no convection. 99L might even be classified before reaching the islands


For 99L to impact Florida with significant winds, it's going to have to reach TD or TS status before the southeastern Bahamas. If it waits to get a good foundation until the central Bahamas it will not have time before it hits land.


I don't know. Some of the models seem to suggest 99 will have time to linger in the Bahamas - over some of the warmest water in the entire Atlantic basin. Upper-level winds are a key factor in terms of potential strength, too. But a system approaching from the SE, slowing and strengthening, then getting turned to the W/WNW and hitting the FL east coast is a potentially worrisome scenario. We haven't really seen anything like that here since Frances and Jeanne in 2004. Still plenty of time to watch, though, and see what unfolds in the modelling.
0 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#348 Postby Weatherboy1 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:26 am

LarryWx wrote:Note that 99L is getting more convection at around 50W (due to higher SST's?), which is where those runs of the GFS/GEFS of a couple of days ago that had it developing by the Lesser Antilles first had it start to develop. Of course, we know they now wait til near the Bahamas for development.


This is definitely a noteworthy development. We've gone from a "naked swirl" to a system that is firing off rather significant convection - though it still lacks organization. Plus, that convection has persisted for many, many hours, also something we haven't seen up until this point. Hmmm.
0 likes   

User avatar
Emmett_Brown
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1432
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:10 pm
Location: Sarasota FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#349 Postby Emmett_Brown » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:31 am

Weatherboy1 wrote:
LarryWx wrote:Note that 99L is getting more convection at around 50W (due to higher SST's?), which is where those runs of the GFS/GEFS of a couple of days ago that had it developing by the Lesser Antilles first had it start to develop. Of course, we know they now wait til near the Bahamas for development.


This is definitely a noteworthy development. We've gone from a "naked swirl" to a system that is firing off rather significant convection - though it still lacks organization. Plus, that convection has persisted for many, many hours, also something we haven't seen up until this point. Hmmm.


Yep, starting to look like a more classic area of disturbed weather now. And, it is a couple of days away from the islands, so still some time to develop, assuming it doesn't go poof today.
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#350 Postby LarryWx » Mon Aug 22, 2016 8:40 am

Weatherboy1 wrote:
LarryWx wrote:Note that 99L is getting more convection at around 50W (due to higher SST's?), which is where those runs of the GFS/GEFS of a couple of days ago that had it developing by the Lesser Antilles first had it start to develop. Of course, we know they now wait til near the Bahamas for development.


This is definitely a noteworthy development. We've gone from a "naked swirl" to a system that is firing off rather significant convection - though it still lacks organization. Plus, that convection has persisted for many, many hours, also something we haven't seen up until this point. Hmmm.


This was what the 6Z GEFS was showing three days ago: Note that it has actually made it to 50W about a day earlier than projected (Mon vs Tue). I wonder if the faster speed than then progged is why they no longer develop it between 50W and the Lesser Antilles:

"Looking at the 20 6Z GEFS members, virtually all of them wait til about Tuesday, when it is near 50W, to develop at all. Subsequently, nearly all 20 of them develop between 50W and the Lesser Antilles Tue-Wed."
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#351 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:05 am

Honestly this is the best this has looked since around 35W and seems to be following the development pattern that the GFS had about 3 to 4 days ago

The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the National Hurricane Center and National Weather Service
0 likes   

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22978
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#352 Postby wxman57 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:18 am

I think it's behaving just as had been forecast. Never expected it to develop any convection until it got closer to the eastern Caribbean. The NHC shouldn't have begun doubting development yesterday because it lacked convection. Take a look at the MIMIC-TPW loop (as I've said). Quite a lot of moisture & energy, and quite a circulation. It could potentially be a Gulf threat, but I'm thinking it has a better chance of tracking into the Bahamas then turning north.
3 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145308
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Recon

#353 Postby cycloneye » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:21 am

The squadron will be very active starting on Tuesday afternoon.Plane departs at 9 AM EDT.

Code: Select all

WEATHER RECONNAISSANCE FLIGHTS
CARCAH, NATIONAL HURRICANE CENTER, MIAMI, FL.
1015 AM EDT MON 22 AUGUST 2016
SUBJECT: TROPICAL CYCLONE PLAN OF THE DAY (TCPOD)
         VALID 23/1100Z TO 24/1100Z AUGUST 2016
         TCPOD NUMBER.....16-088

I.  ATLANTIC REQUIREMENTS
    1. SUSPECT AREA (NEAR LESSER ANTILLES)
       FLIGHT ONE - TEAL 70           FLIGHT TWO - TEAL 71
       A. 23/1500Z                    A. 23/2330Z,24/0530Z
       B. AFXXX 01EEA INVEST          B. AFXXX 0208A CYCLONE
       C. 23/1300Z                    C. 23/2200Z
       D. 16.0N 56.5W                 D. 16.5N 59.0W
       E. 23/1445Z TO 23/1800Z        E. 23/2300Z TO 24/0530Z
       F. SFC TO 10,000 FT            F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

       FLIGHT THREE - TEAL 72
       A. 24/1130Z,1730Z
       B. AFXXX 0308A CYCLONE
       C. 24/1030Z
       D. 17.5N 62.0W
       E. 24/1100Z TO 24/1730Z
       F. SFC TO 10,000 FT

    2. SUCCEEDING DAY OUTLOOK: CONTINUE 6-HRLY FIXES IF SYSTEM
       DEVELOPS AND IS A THREAT.
1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#354 Postby Frank2 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:24 am

This is a good view of now sheared Fiona and the boundary that might be causing the 99L flare:

http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/huirloop.html
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#355 Postby Bocadude85 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:24 am

wxman57 wrote:I think it's behaving just as had been forecast. Never expected it to develop any convection until it got closer to the eastern Caribbean. The NHC shouldn't have begun doubting development yesterday because it lacked convection. Take a look at the MIMIC-TPW loop (as I've said). Quite a lot of moisture & energy, and quite a circulation. It could potentially be a Gulf threat, but I'm thinking it has a better chance of tracking into the Bahamas then turning north.


Any thoughts on a potential Florida/SE Coast threat or are you thinking out to sea after the Bahamas?
0 likes   

SueOrleans
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2015 11:48 am
Location: New Orleans

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#356 Postby SueOrleans » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:29 am

wxman57 wrote: It could potentially be a Gulf threat, but I'm thinking it has a better chance of tracking into the Bahamas then turning north.


I always appreciate your measured approach.

Hopefully it stays out of the Gulf, or at least away from Louisiana. I don't think anybody here wants to see rain again for a while.
2 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5464
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#357 Postby chaser1 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:32 am

Bocadude85 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I think it's behaving just as had been forecast. Never expected it to develop any convection until it got closer to the eastern Caribbean. The NHC shouldn't have begun doubting development yesterday because it lacked convection. Take a look at the MIMIC-TPW loop (as I've said). Quite a lot of moisture & energy, and quite a circulation. It could potentially be a Gulf threat, but I'm thinking it has a better chance of tracking into the Bahamas then turning north.


Any thoughts on a potential Florida/SE Coast threat or are you thinking out to sea after the Bahamas?


my thought: :rarrow: West Palm Beach to Vero (977mb)
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#358 Postby Weatherboy1 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:34 am

Last couple of frames on the visible satellite appear (to me anyway) to be showing some consolidation of a potential center of circulation around 16.5/50.5. Will be interesting to see if that persists ... and whether or not I'm just seeing things after watching too many loops :wink:
0 likes   

Frank2
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4061
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 12:47 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#359 Postby Frank2 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:39 am

This is a good map graphic - hopefully the series of fronts will leave enough of a trough to force it northward...

http://www.nws.noaa.gov/outlook_tab.php
1 likes   

User avatar
Weatherboy1
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1189
Age: 49
Joined: Mon Jul 05, 2004 1:50 pm
Location: Jupiter/Sarasota, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#360 Postby Weatherboy1 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 9:43 am

chaser1 wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:I think it's behaving just as had been forecast. Never expected it to develop any convection until it got closer to the eastern Caribbean. The NHC shouldn't have begun doubting development yesterday because it lacked convection. Take a look at the MIMIC-TPW loop (as I've said). Quite a lot of moisture & energy, and quite a circulation. It could potentially be a Gulf threat, but I'm thinking it has a better chance of tracking into the Bahamas then turning north.


Any thoughts on a potential Florida/SE Coast threat or are you thinking out to sea after the Bahamas?


my thought: :rarrow: West Palm Beach to Vero (977mb)


Some kind of hybrid of the tracks for Erin (1995)/Frances (2004)/Jeanne (2004) is definitely a possibility. But we are still talking about several days out, so the "windshield wiper" model pattern needs to resolve before getting too definitive, in my opinion.
0 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests