ATL: HERMINE - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4773
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3521 Postby psyclone » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:24 pm

BobHarlem wrote:Not aimed at anyone in particular, but whenever I see terms like "will do this", "clearly", and "definitely" used with broad unorganized systems, I tend to immediately take them with a grain of salt.


Great point. Enthusiasm has a tendency to get the better of us. This system has tricked a lot of very good people. daily for multiple days
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3522 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:24 pm

weak but likely there..
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3523 Postby HurriGuy » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:27 pm

Image

Here is the GFS 18Z at 250mb. We are very likely going to see more vertical sheer tomorrow instead of the west to east sheer we have been seeing today. So the further south, closer to Cuba the vorticity stays, the lesser the effects will be. There will very likely be sheer regardless.

Image

You can see how this is all going to play out. There will basically be a ULL to the west, north and east of the southeast Gulf. This will cause the anti-cyclonic flow in that region and you see on latest GFS, come Monday during the day, a much more favorable environment forms as that upper high is keeping it protected.

Everything will depend on the EXACT location of the center of circulation for the remainder of 99L.
Last edited by HurriGuy on Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:32 pm, edited 2 times in total.
1 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4773
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3524 Postby psyclone » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:28 pm

I don't want any extra watches/warnings. No cyclone, no deal. a potential need for immediate watches/warnings is sufficient... should development occur and that's not hard to verbalize in outlooks.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3525 Postby Alyono » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:30 pm

psyclone wrote:I don't want any extra watches/warnings. No cyclone, no deal. a potential need for immediate watches/warnings is sufficient... should development occur and that's not hard to verbalize in outlooks.


and that is going to get people killed one day, which is why the private sector already does watches and warnings pre genesis and the NHC will be going in that direction
3 likes   

User avatar
GeneratorPower
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1648
Age: 45
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 11:48 pm
Location: Huntsville, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3526 Postby GeneratorPower » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:32 pm

Does SPC wait until a tornado is on the ground before issuing a watch or warning? No.
0 likes   

drewschmaltz
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 350
Joined: Thu Aug 27, 2015 8:19 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3527 Postby drewschmaltz » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:32 pm

drewschmaltz wrote:I've ran some unconventional analysis and I'm absolutely certain that MLC and LLC will stack when Discussion page count > Model page count.


Some say an LLC is forming under the MLC, but it looks like we still have about 2 pages to go.
3 likes   
I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. PLEASE CONSULT SOMEONE WHO DOES. START WITH THE NHC. ALL POSTS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY.

HurriGuy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 734
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 8:43 pm
Location: Prairieville, LA

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3528 Postby HurriGuy » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:38 pm

Guess what!

We get another shot at having an ASCAT scan. Maybe it will just clip 99L this time
2 likes   
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3529 Postby Aric Dunn » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:39 pm

drewschmaltz wrote:
drewschmaltz wrote:I've ran some unconventional analysis and I'm absolutely certain that MLC and LLC will stack when Discussion page count > Model page count.


Some say an LLC is forming under the MLC, but it looks like we still have about 2 pages to go.


Lol nothing under the mlc
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
robbielyn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1299
Joined: Wed May 07, 2003 9:45 am
Location: brooksville, fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3530 Postby robbielyn » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:45 pm

GeneratorPower wrote:Does SPC wait until a tornado is on the ground before issuing a watch or warning? No.

Unfair comparisons, theres very minute lead time with tornadoes, 20 minutes tops compared to Hurricanes or TS's which have at least 24 hours to 36 hours. Tornado watches are no guarantee of touchdown but watches have very favorable atmospheric chances of a tornado in the watch areas. 99L has up til now failed to have favorable chances for development. I think up til now it would be crying wolf with no closed low and convection being torn apart by shear. Its need some concrete consistant organization due to conditions being favorable.
0 likes   
Robbielyn McCrary
I know just about enough to sound like I know what I'm talking about sometimes. But for your safety please follow the nhc for truly professional forecasting. :D

psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4773
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3531 Postby psyclone » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:48 pm

Alyono wrote:
psyclone wrote:I don't want any extra watches/warnings. No cyclone, no deal. a potential need for immediate watches/warnings is sufficient... should development occur and that's not hard to verbalize in outlooks.


and that is going to get people killed one day, which is why the private sector already does watches and warnings pre genesis and the NHC will be going in that direction

I know they are. But I need not like it. Stateside I'd really like to see excess warning areas cleared faster when it becomes apparent a given stretch of coastline is in the clear.
0 likes   

bamajammer4eva
Category 4
Category 4
Posts: 907
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 3:21 am
Location: Ozark, AL

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3532 Postby bamajammer4eva » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:54 pm

Looks like 2 spins one between the 2 big areas of convection and the other under the one on the left. Is the LLC where I put the L and the MLC where I put the M here??

Image
0 likes   

hipshot
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 591
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2010 9:18 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3533 Postby hipshot » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:56 pm

I've been watching this thing for days and I can't figure out if it is moving or not. If it is, it has to be crawling.
2 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2777
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3534 Postby Frank P » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:57 pm

There sure looks like a definite rotation on the Miami long range radar loop..... speed it up and watch

http://radar.weather.gov/ridge/radar.ph ... 1&loop=yes
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9623
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Gulf of Gavin Newsom

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion - 8 PM TWO-40%-50%

#3535 Postby Steve » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:57 pm

Michele B wrote:
Steve wrote:
ronjon wrote:
Yeah GP after the three hurricanes in 2004 I had the accordion shutters installed on our three story home in Hernando Beach. Haven't had to close them yet thankfully. But if I had too, all the windows could be done within an hour. :D


Y'all adopting old people? :)

You've been around for a while and know what to do. Biggest threat is some rapid deepening early in the week. I doubt it would be able to hook east after 3 or 4 days unless the ridge building back in from the SE is just behind it. I think a peninsula hit from the west is 20/30% with it being more likely to kick out farther into the Gulf before heading up and in - say somewhere between 85/86.5W or so. No call either way, but I think after SFL somewhere else in the state is likely followed by maybe South AL the way things look now ow the globals. It will probably change.


I hope you're right about this. I'd hate for it to pull a "Charley" and come straight up our way!


Oddly enough, the early 00z models are indicating the possibility. :shrug:
0 likes   

Frank P
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 2777
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3536 Postby Frank P » Sat Aug 27, 2016 9:58 pm

hipshot wrote:I've been watching this thing for days and I can't figure out if it is moving or not. If it is, it has to be crawling.

Its moving, you can see that on the link I just posted referring to the Miami radar..
0 likes   

BobHarlem
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2341
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:11 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3537 Postby BobHarlem » Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:01 pm

A bit easier to see here http://flhurricane.com/imageanimator.php?217

But don't be looking for a center, look for the large overall circulation
3 likes   

rickybobby
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 174
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2015 11:11 am
Location: Central Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3538 Postby rickybobby » Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:05 pm

Per wesh 2 it looks sloppy and have no idea where it's going but should have a better idea tomorrow afternoon.
0 likes   

User avatar
chaser1
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5509
Age: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 15, 2005 5:59 pm
Location: Longwood, Fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3539 Postby chaser1 » Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:09 pm

rickybobby wrote:Per wesh 2 it looks sloppy and have no idea where it's going but should have a better idea tomorrow afternoon.


You get to that point where hopeless honesty is actually refreshing lol!
0 likes   
Andy D

(For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.)

User avatar
TheAustinMan
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1047
Age: 25
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 4:26 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 99L - Discussion

#3540 Postby TheAustinMan » Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:12 pm

METOP-B ASCAT pass at around 2 UTC or so. Looks closed, albeit broad, to my untrained eyes.

Image
Source: http://manati.star.nesdis.noaa.gov/datasets/ASCATBData.php

Edit: Would probably be helpful to contextualize the scatterometer data with satellite imagery, so I overlaid the two -
Image
Last edited by TheAustinMan on Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
ImageImageImage
Treat my opinions with a grain of salt. For official information see your local weather service.


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests