wxman57 wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:interesting the NAM continue to slow the progression of the trough and how far south it gets allowing for the system to stay over water nearly a entire day longer than the 12z and 18z yesterday.
It's a toss-up as far as which model is the absolute worst for tropical cyclones - the NAM, NOGAPS, or Canadian. I think the NOGAPS is still the leader there, with the NAM close on its heels. If my forecast is EVER close to the NOGAPS solution then I know the track is 180 degrees off.
Looking at satellite, my initial impression was "whoa!", then I looped it. I can see a couple of swirls rotating around but I don't think anything is under that convection. Recon should clear that up in a couple of hours.
agreed on the nam. I was not looking for track or intensity just the synoptics. it has over the last 4 runs slowed that trough being much slower.