ConvergenceZone wrote:Do you think they will keep it the same strength on the next advisory in 15 minutes?
Next advisory is in over an hour, not 15 minutes.
Moderator: S2k Moderators
ConvergenceZone wrote:Do you think they will keep it the same strength on the next advisory in 15 minutes?
ConvergenceZone wrote:Gatorcane, are you in the path of this storm at all? Or are you on the west coast of Florida?....Stay safe!
Aric Dunn wrote:ConvergenceZone wrote:Do you think they will keep it the same strength on the next advisory in 15 minutes?
Recon is on its way and will tell us if it has strengthened. From the looks of it I would say 130 maybe and pressure down to 955 ish
lando wrote:@aric - prediction for landfall?? I'm in wpbb
Aric Dunn wrote:lando wrote:@aric - prediction for landfall?? I'm in wpbb
no one can tell you that because of the angle of approach. any little wobble once it starts paralleling the coast would bring it ashore.
anywhere from miami to jax
ronyan wrote:Big flare-up of convection in the NE quad.
KC7NEC wrote:Lost my old login from a few years ago so starting over;
Here is my question: On the scale of actual impacts with damage, casualties, and economic loss at this point wouldn't it actually be more favorable for Matthew to come more west and make full landfall? Yes, wherever that occurs would have devastating impacts but would the land interaction help weaken Matthew enough to lessen impacts of Matthew running just off the coast for hundreds of miles at full steam as a major hurricane?
Michele B wrote:hipshot wrote:JarrodB wrote:My parents have boarded up and will be evacuating Cocoa Beach. I invited them to stay with me in Key West, but not sure if they will take up the offer.
I would like to visit Key West but not right now...LOL.
The good news is it wouldnt' be hard to get there, as ALL traffic would be moving in the opposite direction!
lando wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:lando wrote:@aric - prediction for landfall?? I'm in wpbb
no one can tell you that because of the angle of approach. any little wobble once it starts paralleling the coast would bring it ashore.
anywhere from miami to jax
Of course I would take your answer with a Grain of salt. Like a super bowl prediction. I'm just curious where you have a bunch it'll
Hit
Aric Dunn wrote:lando wrote:@aric - prediction for landfall?? I'm in wpbb
no one can tell you that because of the angle of approach. any little wobble once it starts paralleling the coast would bring it ashore.
anywhere from miami to jax
Aric Dunn wrote:lando wrote:Aric Dunn wrote:
no one can tell you that because of the angle of approach. any little wobble once it starts paralleling the coast would bring it ashore.
anywhere from miami to jax
Of course I would take your answer with a Grain of salt. Like a super bowl prediction. I'm just curious where you have a bunch it'll
Hit
technically it will be close enough to the coast that the western eyewall and thus the higher winds will scrape along the entire coast so everyone will get it lol
Steve wrote:Some of the old pen and marks-a-lot meteorologists of my youth would look toward an angle of lean sometimes for forward motion. Someone might have brought this up earlier, but I skipped a few pages between errands. And it's not foolproof by any means as often quadrants can be suppressed by nearby air masses. But often the way a system is leaning will give you a hint toward it's next general motion. Look at Visible:
http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floater ... imated.gif
Now apply that angle of the system to where it would head. Obviously the center can decide it wants to turn or hook or whatever, but from a general/vague point of view, if you didn't know anything else about hurricanes, you can use this tool for short periods of time when it shows itself. This doesn't work as well with completely round hurricanes for obvious reasons.
Nimbus wrote:Based on the forecast that keeps the eyewall offshore I think Florida may get lucky.
With a forward speed of 20 knots that will effectively reduce the windfield on the west side of the storm.
We should start getting some better windfield analysis soon, except for the exposed beaches, winds reaching the ground may well be 60 knots or more less than the peak predicted winds in the eastern eyewall.
That could make the difference of temporary power outages VS Katrina for a Cat 4 along the east coast of Florida.
KWT wrote:Nimbus wrote:Based on the forecast that keeps the eyewall offshore I think Florida may get lucky.
With a forward speed of 20 knots that will effectively reduce the windfield on the west side of the storm.
We should start getting some better windfield analysis soon, except for the exposed beaches, winds reaching the ground may well be 60 knots or more less than the peak predicted winds in the eastern eyewall.
That could make the difference of temporary power outages VS Katrina for a Cat 4 along the east coast of Florida.
Bare in mind if the forecast is just offshore, the eyewall likely WOULD go onshore, the NHC track probably would put the western part of the eyewall onshore, and obviousy any slight westward hints will spread that inland.
Of course any wobbles will make a big difference!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests