ATL: MATTHEW - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
psyclone
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 4762
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:04 pm
Location: palm harbor fl

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#701 Postby psyclone » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:59 am

cycloneye wrote:Those eastward trends are beginning to worry me here in PR.


I recall some of the very first model runs impacted PR from the southeast. Perhaps we've taken the non Euclidean route back there. I'd be more concerned in PR than FL at this point..
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#702 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Sep 26, 2016 11:59 am

What happens if the next Euro solution is in the eastern GOM, here come s some busy times for storm2k
0 likes   

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#703 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:01 pm

Heck, even the euro ensembles don't let the central GOM off the hook
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#704 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:01 pm

gatorcane wrote:Why doesn't the GFS move this system more WSW (ala the UKMET) looking at the ridge? Is it me or does it plow right through it...?

Image


How many times do you need to see the MU drive storms through 500mb ridges before we all realize the model is a flawed piece of dog doodoo?

Or maybe it's bull doodoo
0 likes   

LarryWx
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6305
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2003 2:04 pm
Location: GA

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#705 Postby LarryWx » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:06 pm

Alyono wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Why doesn't the GFS move this system more WSW (ala the UKMET) looking at the ridge? Is it me or does it plow right through it...?

Image


How many times do you need to see the MU drive storms through 500mb ridges before we all realize the model is a flawed piece of dog doodoo?

Or maybe it's bull doodoo


Can't a storm go north through a 500 mb ridge if the steering level is a good bit lower than 500 mb due to being weak and if the steering winds are, say, more SE to S..say on the backside of a high at 700-850 mb?
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#706 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:08 pm

not one as defined as this will be. This should be forced slightly south of due west in the Caribbean
0 likes   

OntarioEggplant
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 312
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:16 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#707 Postby OntarioEggplant » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:12 pm

LarryWx wrote:
Alyono wrote:
gatorcane wrote:Why doesn't the GFS move this system more WSW (ala the UKMET) looking at the ridge? Is it me or does it plow right through it...?

Image


How many times do you need to see the MU drive storms through 500mb ridges before we all realize the model is a flawed piece of dog doodoo?

Or maybe it's bull doodoo


Can't a storm go north through a 500 mb ridge if the steering level is a good bit lower than 500 mb due to being weak and if the steering winds are, say, more SE to S..say on the backside of a high at 700-850 mb?


That would mean that you would have flows in two different directions at different heights which means the storm would get the crap sheared out of it.
0 likes   

User avatar
tropicwatch
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3384
Age: 61
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 10:01 am
Location: Panama City Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#708 Postby tropicwatch » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:13 pm

Is it just me or is this sharp of a recurve when a storm is this far south, somewhat unusual?

Image
1 likes   
Tropicwatch


Agnes 72', Eloise 75, Elena 85', Kate 85', Charley 86', Florence 88', Beryl 94', Dean 95', Erin 95', Opal 95', Earl 98', Georges 98', Ivan 2004', Arlene 2005', Dennis 2005', Ida 2009' Debby 2012' Irma 2017' Michael 2018'

User avatar
Hurricaneman
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 7351
Age: 45
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 3:24 pm
Location: central florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#709 Postby Hurricaneman » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:15 pm

If the GFS is bogus then most of those models will be too
0 likes   

User avatar
centuryv58
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 233
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:24 pm
Location: Southeast Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#710 Postby centuryv58 » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:16 pm

panamatropicwatch wrote:Is it just me or is this sharp of a recurve when a storm is this far south, somewhat unusual?

Image


Its not you, IMO. Something strange, or one for the books.
0 likes   

User avatar
BensonTCwatcher
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 10:11 pm
Location: Southport NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#711 Postby BensonTCwatcher » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:16 pm

Alyono wrote:not one as defined as this will be. This should be forced slightly south of due west in the Caribbean


See, I thought that was the case looking at the height of the ridge and even the depth of the system depicted. Although I am not convinced the storm will be that organized in 60 hrs. It's getting it's act together, but dry air to the south might really hold up convection if it's that far south.

Anyway we'll know later this week. Definitely the most interesting cyclone ( or about to be ) this year.
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#712 Postby TheStormExpert » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:17 pm

12z models recap so far.

12z GFS: Trends further East making an abrupt north turn allowing it to make landfall in Dominican Republic as a strong Cat.4 nearly a Cat.5 before heading Out to Sea just East of Bermuda restrengthening.

12z UKMET: Trends further west and delays development significantly with only subtle gradual development through 144hrs.

12z CMC: Reamins the same as 00z run with an abrupt northward turn just SSE of Jamaica missing Jamaica barely to the East then goes over extrem Eastern Cuba before cutting through the Central Bahamas on it's way Out to Sea as a strengthening hurricane.

What I am currently taking from these latest runs is that a track into the Eastern or even Central Caribbean seems very likely. After that where it takes the abrupt northward turn is key for whichever Caribbean Island(s) gets future Matthew/97L. After that it is likely that the Southeastern or even parts of the Central Bahamas and Turks & Caicos Islands could feel the affects of future Matthew/97L while it passes through or near on it's way Out to Sea. At the moment I'm discounting the Euro until I see future runs of it and what they have to show.
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#713 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:17 pm

BensonTCwatcher wrote:
Alyono wrote:not one as defined as this will be. This should be forced slightly south of due west in the Caribbean


See, I thought that was the case looking at the height of the ridge and even the depth of the system depicted. Although I am not convinced the storm will be that organized in 60 hrs. It's getting it's act together, but dry air to the south might really hold up convection if it's that far south.

Anyway we'll know later this week. Definitely the most interesting cyclone ( or about to be ) this year.


Due to the passage of the Kelvin wave, there should not be any dry air issues from this
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#714 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:17 pm

12Z NAVGEM heading north through Bahamas very close to SE Florida:

Image
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#715 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:18 pm

TheStormExpert wrote:12z models recap so far.

12z GFS: Trends further East making an abrupt north turn allowing it to make landfall in Dominican Republic as a strong Cat.4 nearly a Cat.5 before heading Out to Sea just East of Bermuda restrengthening.

12z UKMET: Trends further west and delays development significantly with only subtle gradual development through 144hrs.

12z CMC: Reamins the same as 00z run with an abrupt northward turn just SSE of Jamaica missing Jamaica barely to the East then goes over extrem Eastern Cuba before cutting through the Central Bahamas on it's way Out to Sea as a strengthening hurricane.

What I am currently taking from these latest runs is that a track into the Eastern or even Central Caribbean seems very likely. After that where it takes the abrupt northward turn is key for whichever Caribbean Island(s) gets future Matthew/97L. After that it is likely that the Southeastern or even parts of the Central Bahamas and Turks & Caicos Islands could feel the affects of future Matthew/97L while it passes through or near on it's way Out to Sea. At the moment I'm discounting the Euro until I see future runs of it and what they have to show.


You may want to look at the ENTIRE MU/CMC run. The storm is very close to getting shoved into the coast similar to Sandy in both runs
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#716 Postby Alyono » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:19 pm

gatorcane wrote:12Z NAVGEM heading north through Bahamas very close to SE Florida:

Image


what's the link to that? I don't get NAVGEM at the office (shows how poor the model is)
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#717 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:19 pm

12Z GFS ensembles not shifting west one bit:

Image
0 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23691
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#718 Postby gatorcane » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:20 pm

Alyono wrote:
gatorcane wrote:12Z NAVGEM heading north through Bahamas very close to SE Florida:

http://s10.postimg.org/f4oc9xbyx/nvg10_ ... oplant.gif


what's the link to that? I don't get NAVGEM at the office (shows how poor the model is)


https://www.fnmoc.navy.mil/wxmap_cgi/cg ... t=Tropical
0 likes   

TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#719 Postby TheStormExpert » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:20 pm

Hurricaneman wrote:If the GFS is bogus then most of those models will be too

There is a small chance that the GFS is bogus IMO. Yes it is likely too strong with the peak intensity and we will likely see a Cat.2/Cat.3 at peak IMO. The turn north is due to a strong trough or Cut-off Low very typical for Early October as the pattern is progressing towards a Fall/Winter like pattern.
0 likes   

User avatar
cycloneye
Admin
Admin
Posts: 145327
Age: 68
Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2002 10:54 am
Location: San Juan, Puerto Rico

Re: ATL: INVEST 97L - Models

#720 Postby cycloneye » Mon Sep 26, 2016 12:25 pm

1 likes   
Visit the Caribbean-Central America Weather Thread where you can find at first post web cams,radars
and observations from Caribbean basin members Click Here


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests