ATL: MATTHEW - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
marye45
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 16
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2016 11:51 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7361 Postby marye45 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:30 pm

Alyono wrote:One potential major concern. If this does come inland near Palm Beach, tidal surge over Lake Okeechobee could be very bad

That could be a repeat of the 1928 okeechobee hurricane ☹️️
0 likes   

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7362 Postby stephen23 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:30 pm

Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Matthew still isn't strengthening per latest past. Pressures around 960mb.

960 mb would be a 2mb drop in last pass but I have yet to see a vortex message from this pass. Plotted looks like they missed the center and are making a sharp turn
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7363 Postby northjaxpro » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:30 pm

SouthDadeFish wrote:Low-level structure of Hurricane Matthew looks to be improving. Almost a closed cyan ring (classic cyan ring would be thicker on SW side to my understanding). For those unfamiliar with microwave imagery, a cyan ring around the eye is a harbinger of rapid intensification.

 https://twitter.com/MikeFischerWx/status/783838482233958400




Looking at microwave and IR imagery,it sure looks to me that the eyewall has fully closed. It is just about time for liftoff of rather modest intensification of the cyclone to take place shortly.
1 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7364 Postby Hammy » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:31 pm

Somebody mentioned the ERC and it got me wondering, this was in the middle of one when it made landfall--that may have caused a greater reduction in organization than may have otherwise occurred.
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ThetaE
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 244
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 4:50 pm
Location: Boston

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7365 Postby ThetaE » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:32 pm

Hammy wrote:Somebody mentioned the ERC and it got me wondering, this was in the middle of one when it made landfall--that may have caused a greater reduction in organization than may have otherwise occurred.


I thought Matthew completed his ERC before landfall. The eye was noticably larger before making landfall in Haiti.
Last edited by ThetaE on Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   
I'm a busy grad student, not a professional forecaster. Please refer to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts.

Michele B
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1114
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:08 am
Location: SWFL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7366 Postby Michele B » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:33 pm

johngaltfla wrote:
Michele B wrote:
johngaltfla wrote:
BAD advice. There is no guarantee YET that the storm will not take a more westerly path. Heading to the panhandle region would be the safest area for now. Besides, every room within 60 miles of Sarasota is pretty much booked now per our local news at 6 pm.


Agreed, panhandle is safest if you can get there, and not get caught up in lots and lots of traffic.

We are in a little town west of Lake Okeechobee, but not all the way to Sarasota. Went out earlier and so much traffic coming home - ALL going west, obviously running from the storm.


Okeechobee is under a Hurricane Warning and West of there a Tropical Storm Warning. I would not move anywhere near points from Sarasota south just in case this storm turns hard left (aka, Katrina) at the last minute. Based on the models and forecasts, you're in for a rough ride and those folks who bugged out to Arcadia could have a long night tomorrow also.


Hope you're wrong about THAT!

:wink:
0 likes   
Cleo - 1964, Betsy - 1965, David - 1979, Andrew - 1992, Charlie (Francis, Ivan, Jeanne) - 2004, Irma - 2017, Ian - 2022

DeanDaDream
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:44 pm
Location: Keystone Heights, Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7367 Postby DeanDaDream » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:33 pm

jdray wrote:
delta lady wrote:
northjaxpro wrote:
I am here in Jacksonville and all this is going to depend just how close the eyewall will come and then pass within the Northeast Florida coast. The forecast is for the eyewall to come within 30-40 miles of Jacksonville Beach. Should that manifest, hurrucane conditions willbe experienced from about the I-95 corridor east to the coast with regards to Matthew's closest approach here. I think 40-60. mph sustajned winds will be likely just inland and points to the the St.Johns River .
. I was in Orlando 2004 for Charlie, Frances and Jeanne all in a 31 day time span. Horrendous power outages, even though we had underground utilities. Now that I'm in Jax what scares the bejesus out of me is the fact that you don't have underground utilities. Everything is above ground. A direct hit on this city would be catastrophic for the downed power lines alone. Let's not even talk about the trees.


I live out in Clay County, while my neighborhood has underground utilities, there are still some above ground lines between me and the substation. I lost power with Frances for 3 days.
I also live Clay County what do you think winds will be like here?
0 likes   

User avatar
OverlandHurricane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:50 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7368 Postby OverlandHurricane » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:33 pm

Point of information: In order for this to qualify as a landfall, must the entire eye come onshore, or only the center of circulation?
0 likes   

User avatar
Hammy
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5849
Age: 42
Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7369 Postby Hammy » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:34 pm

ThetaE wrote:
Hammy wrote:Somebody mentioned the ERC and it got me wondering, this was in the middle of one when it made landfall--that may have caused a greater reduction in organization than may have otherwise occurred.


I thought Matthew completed his ERC before landfall. The eye was noticably larger.


Concentric eye walls were visible on radar at the time.

Image
0 likes   
The above post is not official and should not be used as such. It is the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is not endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7370 Postby Exalt » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:34 pm

Hammy wrote:Somebody mentioned the ERC and it got me wondering, this was in the middle of one when it made landfall--that may have caused a greater reduction in organization than may have otherwise occurred.


I don't think so, it's first ERC didn't even seem to be a complete one, and even at that, I thought it had managed to finish itself off before its landfall in Haiti (which explains why the CDO expanded so much, and stability increased wind-wise).
Last edited by Exalt on Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

hurricaneCW
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 am
Location: Toms River, NJ

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7371 Postby hurricaneCW » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:34 pm

You probably want it to intensify and peak now rather than when it's nearing, you don't want another Charley effect along the entire east coast of Florida.
1 likes   

stephen23
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 341
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 10:57 pm
Location: North Fort Worth

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7372 Postby stephen23 » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:34 pm

Hammy wrote:Somebody mentioned the ERC and it got me wondering, this was in the middle of one when it made landfall--that may have caused a greater reduction in organization than may have otherwise occurred.

To me it looked like the MLC got hung up in the mountains a bid last night while the LLC was already over water. Sure that didn't help at all.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

Digital-TC-Chaser

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7373 Postby Digital-TC-Chaser » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:35 pm

northjaxpro wrote:
SouthDadeFish wrote:Low-level structure of Hurricane Matthew looks to be improving. Almost a closed cyan ring (classic cyan ring would be thicker on SW side to my understanding). For those unfamiliar with microwave imagery, a cyan ring around the eye is a harbinger of rapid intensification.

 https://twitter.com/MikeFischerWx/status/783838482233958400




Looking at microwave and IR imagery,it sure looks to me that the eyewall has fully closed. It is just about time for liftoff of rather modest intensification of the cyclone to take place shortly.


cyan ring like that usually indicates intensifying hurricane.
0 likes   

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7374 Postby Exalt » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:35 pm

Hammy wrote:
ThetaE wrote:
Hammy wrote:Somebody mentioned the ERC and it got me wondering, this was in the middle of one when it made landfall--that may have caused a greater reduction in organization than may have otherwise occurred.


I thought Matthew completed his ERC before landfall. The eye was noticably larger.


Concentric eye walls were visible on radar at the time.

http://flhurricane.com/images/mirrors/2 ... 161910.gif


I don't think those are necessarily concentric eyewalls, I think it's the original eyewall attempting to reorganize after taking the hit from Haiti, 95% of that heavy convection is still very much centered around the original eyewall there.
Last edited by Exalt on Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
Hypercane_Kyle
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3355
Joined: Sat Mar 07, 2015 7:58 pm
Location: Cape Canaveral, FL

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7375 Postby Hypercane_Kyle » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:36 pm

stephen23 wrote:
Hypercane_Kyle wrote:Matthew still isn't strengthening per latest past. Pressures around 960mb.

960 mb would be a 2mb drop in last pass but I have yet to see a vortex message from this pass. Plotted looks like they missed the center and are making a sharp turn


Dropsonde shows 961mb.
0 likes   
My posts are my own personal opinion, defer to the National Hurricane Center (NHC) and other NOAA products for decision making during hurricane season.

stormreader

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7376 Postby stormreader » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:36 pm

marye45 wrote:
Alyono wrote:One potential major concern. If this does come inland near Palm Beach, tidal surge over Lake Okeechobee could be very bad

That could be a repeat of the 1928 okeechobee hurricane ☹️️

You know the 1928 Okeechobee Hurricane was the same storm as the San Felipe Hurricane which devastated Puerto Rico. Taking both of those landfalls into account it truly has to be one of the very most important hurricanes of the 20th century. I believe I read where the dike at Okeechobee is much improved from 1928.
0 likes   

ZX12R
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2016 8:09 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7377 Postby ZX12R » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:36 pm

OverlandHurricane wrote:Point of information: In order for this to qualify as a landfall, must the entire eye come onshore, or only the center of circulation?


That's what I was going to ask. What is the exact definition of landfall?
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10154
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7378 Postby Blown Away » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:36 pm

Alyono wrote:One potential major concern. If this does come inland near Palm Beach, tidal surge over Lake Okeechobee could be very bad


How realistic is that? Is there anything in the current situation or modeling that gives you that thought?
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05… Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
JaxGator
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:33 pm
Location: Jacksonville Florida

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7379 Postby JaxGator » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:36 pm

Levi Cowan ‏@TropicalTidbits 41m41 minutes ago
The process of becoming symmetric with a closed eyewall is what could allow Hurricane #Matthew to begin strengthening any time now.
0 likes   
The posts or stuff said are NOT an official forecast. Please look to the NHC and NWS for official forecasts and products.

Floyd-1999, Frances-2004, Jeanne-2004, Fay-2008, Beryl-2012, Debby-2012, Colin-2016, Hermine-2016, Julia-2016, Matthew-2016, Irma-2017, Elsa-2021, Idalia-2023, Debby-2024, Helene-2024.


Go Gators! Go Jags!

Exalt
Category 1
Category 1
Posts: 337
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2015 10:55 pm

Re: ATL: MATTHEW - Hurricane - Discussion

#7380 Postby Exalt » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:37 pm

Blown Away wrote:
Alyono wrote:One potential major concern. If this does come inland near Palm Beach, tidal surge over Lake Okeechobee could be very bad


How realistic is that? Is there anything in the current situation or modeling that gives you that thought?


Well, the NHC's issuance of a hurricane warning to the Okeechobee area while under the threat of a severe Cat 4, is enough to warrant fear of tidal surge alone.
1 likes   


Return to “2016”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests