ATL: IRMA - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Evenstar
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:11 pm
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10521 Postby Evenstar » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:13 pm

eastcoastFL wrote:
Alyono wrote:I have to disagree with the NHC in the strongest possible terms about this striking as a category 3 and not a category 4 hurricane. One cannot ignore the signal from the global models or the pressure falls we have seen. I strongly believe this will be a 4 or maybe even a 5 at landfall


Wow that's a bold statement. I have no reason to disagree. I actually agree with you 100% but I'm not a pro...you are.


When one of our Pro Mets makes a bold statement, I become alarmed. The reason I become alarmed is because our Pro Mets are not alarmists.
4 likes   
I never received my Hogwarts letter, so I'm leaving the Shire and becoming a Sith Lord.

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34002
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10522 Postby CrazyC83 » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:14 pm

meriland29 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
meriland29 wrote:Doesn't sound like the NHC thinks she is going to strengthen unless she completes another ERC..


it completed already. Plus, the global models show the most intensification AFTER Key West. SHIPS/LGE are being given far too much weight. We saw this last year with Matthew in the Caribbean. You cannot use global models for precise intensity, but you can for the trends



Then why does the NHC confirm it still has a double eyewall structure?


Radar right now suggests the eyewall is nearly back to whole? The inner eyewall is largely gone in the W side, and the E side is merging in.
0 likes   

User avatar
ConvergenceZone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 5194
Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 1:40 am
Location: Northern California

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10523 Postby ConvergenceZone » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:14 pm

Wow. If this track shifts anymore west, Florida may really be dodging a bullet compared to what was thought previously, that is, if it does start to weaken in 24 to 36 hours as the NHC says it will
1 likes   

bonjourno
Tropical Depression
Tropical Depression
Posts: 69
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 12:59 am
Location: Central Florida

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10524 Postby bonjourno » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:15 pm

TJRE wrote:https://goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/goescolor/goeseast/hurricane2/color_med/latest.jpg



Weather noob here. What's that big line of clouds emanating northeast from Irma? Is that a front of some kind, or related to the tropical system?
0 likes   

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10525 Postby meriland29 » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:15 pm

Not sure what to think, especially since this is recon confirmed and they are the ones actually there, we are basing this off of a radar...
0 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10526 Postby eastcoastFL » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:16 pm

Not sure if I missed this on another advisory but he TS windfield is now 205 miles from the center. So even if she's on the west coast it will bring sustained TS winds to much of the state.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
wx247
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 14279
Age: 41
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 10:35 pm
Location: Monett, Missouri
Contact:

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10527 Postby wx247 » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:16 pm

WINK meteorologist is on air saying that the wind representation that the NHC is putting out is overestimated. He does this by showing Key West only having 37 mph sustained winds although his "model" shows they should already be seeing hurricane force gusts. This is very irresponsible.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
HurricaneBelle
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1180
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 6:12 pm
Location: Clearwater, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10528 Postby HurricaneBelle » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:16 pm

I'm a bit confused by NHC's reasoning in the discussion. They stated because it's slowing down they had to shift the track westward. Wouldn't that give the trof more time to advance east and pick it up before it gets further west?
1 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10529 Postby RL3AO » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:16 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:Wow. If this track shifts anymore west, Florida may really be dodging a bullet compared to what was thought previously, that is, if it does start to weaken in 24 to 36 hours as the NHC says it will


If you want Florida to dodge a bullet, then you should want an east shift. A west shift puts Tampa east of the eyewall opening up the possibility of seeing one of America's greatest potential disasters coming to fruition.
5 likes   

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10530 Postby eastcoastFL » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:16 pm

meriland29 wrote:Not sure what to think, especially since this is recon confirmed and they are the ones actually there, we are basing this off of a radar...


I don't think it's recon confirmed. The nhc is saying they are still waiting on recon data.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

ronyan
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 791
Age: 39
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Lake Jackson, TX

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10531 Postby ronyan » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:17 pm

meriland29 wrote:Not sure what to think, especially since this is recon confirmed and they are the ones actually there, we are basing this off of a radar...


They caught the tail end of the cycle...
0 likes   

ApproximateKnowledge
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:01 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10532 Postby ApproximateKnowledge » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:17 pm

bonjourno wrote:
TJRE wrote:https://goes.gsfc.nasa.gov/goescolor/goeseast/hurricane2/color_med/latest.jpg



Weather noob here. What's that big line of clouds emanating northeast from Irma? Is that a front of some kind, or related to the tropical system?


That's the trough is punching a hole for her northward turn. What you're seeing is powerful southwest-to-northeast winds in the upper levels pulling Irma's outflow northeast. For now, it's venting the storm, which could permit strengthening, but she shouldn't survive running headlong into that kind of shear with her core.
1 likes   

User avatar
Evil Jeremy
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 5463
Age: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 10, 2006 2:10 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10533 Postby Evil Jeremy » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:18 pm

AutoPenalti wrote:Friend down in Coconut Creek says it's pretty quiet.


There was a solid hour long window around 8ish where heavy bands moved through the area, with half a dozen tornado warnings issued across SE FL in that span, including a couple in central Broward. It's calm now, but looking at the radar it should pick up again in an hour or so.
1 likes   
Frances 04 / Jeanne 04 / Katrina 05 / Wilma 05 / Fay 08 / Debby 12 / Andrea 13 / Colin 16 / Hermine 16 / Matthew 16 / Irma 17

User avatar
eastcoastFL
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3900
Age: 43
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 12:29 pm
Location: Palm City, FL

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10534 Postby eastcoastFL » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:18 pm

HurricaneBelle wrote:I'm a bit confused by NHC's reasoning in the discussion. They stated because it's slowing down they had to shift the track westward. Wouldn't that give the trof more time to advance east and pick it up before it gets further west?


I think if it slows down the ridge could build back in pushing her further west. I think.
2 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
meriland29
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 770
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2017 11:05 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10535 Postby meriland29 » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:18 pm

eastcoastFL wrote:
meriland29 wrote:Not sure what to think, especially since this is recon confirmed and they are the ones actually there, we are basing this off of a radar...


I don't think it's recon confirmed. The nhc is saying they are still waiting on recon data.



"Irma's nearly 24-hour traversal of the north coast of Cuba appears
to have affected the hurricane's structure and intensity. An
earlier NOAA Hurricane Hunter aircraft and a more recent Air Force
reconnaissance flight both measured maximum flight-level winds near
105 kt and surface winds near 95 kt. The planes have reported
a double eyewall structure
, which has also been observed in WSR-88D
Doppler radar data from Miami and Key West. Irma's intensity has
been conservatively lowered to 105 kt, and I'd rather wait to lower
the winds further until we've seen the full data set from the Air
Force mission."
0 likes   

User avatar
weathaguyry
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1272
Age: 22
Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2016 5:16 am
Location: Long Island, NY

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10536 Postby weathaguyry » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:19 pm

On people's Snapchat videos, you can see that people cracked open a beer when the storm started, one thing leads to another and now there are intoxicated people roaming the streets of Miami at 11:18PM during a hurricane :(
2 likes   
My posts are only my opinions and NOT official forecasts. For official forecasts, consult the National Hurricane Center or the National Weather Service.

Irene 11', Sandy 12', Fay 20’, Isaias 20’, Elsa 21’, Henri 21’, Ida 21’

User avatar
PTPatrick
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 8:38 am

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10537 Postby PTPatrick » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:19 pm

I could see it becoming a 4 again before landfall and still getting some cheat and dropping back before...it'll be a moot point. The trade off a further west path is more time to strengthen but also more time to weaken.

Edit: and all the more reason why the saffir Simpson scale has probably outlasted its usefulness. I think at this point nhc's move toward breaking up warnings for threat is probably not a bad one but I know saffir isn't going away.
Last edited by PTPatrick on Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
1 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10538 Postby Alyono » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:19 pm

meriland29 wrote:
Alyono wrote:
meriland29 wrote:Doesn't sound like the NHC thinks she is going to strengthen unless she completes another ERC..


it completed already. Plus, the global models show the most intensification AFTER Key West. SHIPS/LGE are being given far too much weight. We saw this last year with Matthew in the Caribbean. You cannot use global models for precise intensity, but you can for the trends



Then why does the NHC confirm it still has a double eyewall structure?



they see a rainband well outside of the eye that has a wind maximum. I'd argue that is NOT a secondary eyewall. It's simply a rainband with hurricane force winds
2 likes   

ApproximateKnowledge
Tropical Low
Tropical Low
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 9:01 pm

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10539 Postby ApproximateKnowledge » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:20 pm

ConvergenceZone wrote:Wow. If this track shifts anymore west, Florida may really be dodging a bullet compared to what was thought previously, that is, if it does start to weaken in 24 to 36 hours as the NHC says it will


Not even close. Tampa on the right front of a large, low-pressure Cat 3 would produce extreme storm surge levels in Tampa Bay. Some of the area is vulnerable to 20+ ft surges if the storm comes in at the right angle and, as a former Tampa resident, I can tell you that *nothing* in Tampa is much above 20 feet up.
1 likes   

Raebie
Category 3
Category 3
Posts: 822
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2003 8:00 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Re: ATL: IRMA - Hurricane - Discussion

#10540 Postby Raebie » Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:21 pm

RL3AO wrote:
ConvergenceZone wrote:Wow. If this track shifts anymore west, Florida may really be dodging a bullet compared to what was thought previously, that is, if it does start to weaken in 24 to 36 hours as the NHC says it will


If you want Florida to dodge a bullet, then you should want an east shift. A west shift puts Tampa east of the eyewall opening up the possibility of seeing one of America's greatest potential disasters coming to fruition.


This. I tried to state earlier.
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests