ATL: HARVEY - Models

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15982
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1181 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:55 pm

00z GFS at hour 90 has a major hurricane about to make landfall, down to 955mb.

Image
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1182 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:56 pm

I think I said worst case scenario for any MET..we lack good intensity models..going to have a shift in models North..
0 likes   

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1183 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:57 pm

Kingarabian wrote:00z GFS at hour 90 has a major hurricane about to make landfall, down to 955mb.

Image


Yep mid Texas coast
0 likes   

Alyono
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 6961
Joined: Fri Apr 26, 2013 3:52 pm
Location: Texas Coast

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1184 Postby Alyono » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:58 pm

GFS cat 3 into the middle TX coast
0 likes   

hd44

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1185 Postby hd44 » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:58 pm

Models adjusting towards my full blown hurricane idea.
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15982
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1186 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Aug 21, 2017 10:59 pm

00z GFS hrs 72-96

Image
0 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

User avatar
NotSparta
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 1671
Age: 23
Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:24 am
Location: Naples, FL
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1187 Postby NotSparta » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:00 pm

Another run, another shift north it seems with models on this storm
0 likes   
This post was probably an opinion of mine, and in no way is official. Please refer to http://www.hurricanes.gov for official tropical analysis and advisories.

My website, with lots of tropical wx graphics, including satellite and recon: http://cyclonicwx.com

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15982
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1188 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:00 pm

00z GFS is a cat 4 making landfall over middle Texas:

Image
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Stormcenter
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 6684
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 11:27 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1189 Postby Stormcenter » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:00 pm

Now who said LA. was completely in the clear? This is not a good trend for anyone, might be worth staying up for EURO.
1 likes   

User avatar
stormhunter7
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 762
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 3:13 pm
Location: Panama City Beach, Florida
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1190 Postby stormhunter7 » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:02 pm

Image
0 likes   
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products. http://www.nhc.noaa.gov

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1191 Postby SoupBone » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:02 pm

PTrackerLA wrote:GFS further north and depicting a hurricane at 78hrs, yikes.


I don't get it at all, but either one or more of these models will shine and come out king, or will miserably bust.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
ROCK
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 9484
Age: 54
Joined: Tue Aug 17, 2004 7:30 am
Location: Kemah, Texas

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1192 Postby ROCK » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:02 pm

Bad ugly devestating run..not over a major city like Galveston / Houston but any deviation north and wow...
1 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15982
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1193 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:02 pm

The GFS run at 00z takeaways:

1. The GFS continues to shift North meaning the models still have a bad handle on the steering pattern.

2. The GFS continues to only show intensification until the system is 24 hours away from landfall, although it did begin strengthening the system a tad bit earlier.
2 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

sphelps8681
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 785
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:37 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1194 Postby sphelps8681 » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:03 pm

Stormcenter wrote:Now who said LA. was completely in the clear? This is not a good trend for anyone, might be worth staying up for EURO.



I am going to try not sure if I will make it. This is going to be quite a night!!
0 likes   

User avatar
Kingarabian
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 15982
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1195 Postby Kingarabian » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:04 pm

I'll be back after dinner to post the 00z Euro.
1 likes   
RIP Kobe Bryant

Wx_Warrior
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu Aug 03, 2006 3:58 pm
Location: Beaumont, TX

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1196 Postby Wx_Warrior » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:04 pm

Recon scheduled for tomorrow.
0 likes   

User avatar
tarheelprogrammer
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1793
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2016 9:25 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC area (Garner, NC)

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1197 Postby tarheelprogrammer » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:04 pm

The models still going north, and trending stronger. That is not a good sign.
0 likes   
My posts are not official forecasts. They are just my opinion and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

User avatar
SoupBone
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 3111
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 5:24 pm

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1198 Postby SoupBone » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:04 pm

ROCK wrote:Bad ugly devestating run..not over a major city like Galveston / Houston but any deviation north and wow...



looks to go right over Port O'Connor/Matagorda area.
0 likes   
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecast and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.

weatherguy425
Tropical Storm
Tropical Storm
Posts: 180
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX > Lubbock, TX > Savannah, GA
Contact:

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1199 Postby weatherguy425 » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:05 pm

While I think anyone along the northwestern and western Gulf Coast needs to keep an eye on this, it is worth noting the similarities between GFS's 18Z & OZ runs. Shift northward was much more subtle. Must also keep model resolution in mind.
0 likes   

User avatar
Steve
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 9621
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 11:41 pm
Location: Not a state-caster

Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models

#1200 Postby Steve » Mon Aug 21, 2017 11:05 pm

ROCK wrote:Well this is the farthest the NAM has been east and seems plausible IMO. Steering collapses ULL and trof create the weakness. Though it's the NAM it is the trof that it stills showing digging.


It could make sense if there was a time delay. But like I said, it just seems out of range. I admittedly only have my own experiences to go on with NAM and have no idea on its verification down that way. But it seems that when anything is that far down and the NAM is sort of the outlier, you have to mostly discount it. Certainly that could be a different if it was tracking something 250 miles farther north. But with South Texas giving the TVCN and not really all that much time - 4 days max I think - that's the way I'd lean for now. Wilacy or Kenedy Co. would probably be best case because of how sparsely populated those areas are as compared to the major TX coastal cities.
1 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests