SFLcane wrote:Still no HWRF being run for 92L..

06z HWRF keeps 92L a weak TW/TD, but appears to begin to strengthen starting @126 hrs...
Moderator: S2k Moderators
SFLcane wrote:Still no HWRF being run for 92L..
no worries, hwrf will go to major at some pointBlown Away wrote:SFLcane wrote:Still no HWRF being run for 92L..
http://i.imgur.com/h7ZAHvJ.jpg
06z HWRF keeps 92L a weak TW/TD, but appears to begin to strengthen starting @126 hrs...
Blown Away wrote:06z...
http://i.imgur.com/PjvJ1tr.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/Y1OAjmB.jpg
Slight uptick in intensity compared to previous runs...
Alyono wrote:NEW TROPICAL CYCLONE FORECAST TO DEVELOP AFTER 102 HOURS
FORECAST POSITION AT T+102 : 20.0N 61.1W
LEAD CENTRAL MAXIMUM WIND
VERIFYING TIME TIME POSITION PRESSURE (MB) SPEED (KNOTS)
-------------- ---- -------- ------------- -------------
1200UTC 20.08.2017 108 20.3N 62.3W 1009 33
0000UTC 21.08.2017 120 21.4N 65.2W 1007 38
1200UTC 21.08.2017 132 22.5N 67.9W 1004 41
0000UTC 22.08.2017 144 23.2N 70.2W 1000 44
UKMET saying trouble on the horizon
gatorcane wrote:That would not be a recurve on the UKMET. See 144 hours below 500mb pattern:
jlauderdal wrote:gatorcane wrote:That would not be a recurve on the UKMET. See 144 hours below 500mb pattern:
recurve isnt in the cards so we can take that off the table...too much ridging..issue with this system is survival
SFLcane wrote:Yea UKMET seems interesting but it hasn't done to well this season thus far. On that last frame it looks to probable recurve. Atleast lets hope.![]()
UKMET, CMC, and HWRF all hint at possibly a more favorable environment near bahamas. But that could change with that shear zone close
SFLcane wrote:Yea here is the another look at the NAVGEM ;0) but i think this is not 92L this is future 93L. Looks to have dropped development with 92L.
SFLcane wrote:Yea here is the another look at the NAVGEM ;0) but i think this is not 92L this is future 93L. Looks to have dropped development with 92L.
com/sM1S7Ci.gif[/img]
Bocadude85 wrote:SFLcane wrote:Yea here is the another look at the NAVGEM ;0) but i think this is not 92L this is future 93L. Looks to have dropped development with 92L.
The 6z NAVGEM runs 92L over the Greater Antilles that's why it doesn't show development.
WeatherEmperor wrote:06z NAVGEM has 92L approaching the northern islands in 6 days as a TD/TS:
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201708 ... 92505d.png
Sent from my iPhone 7 using Tapatalk
SFLcane wrote:Sooo 57 based on guidance this one could be a problem " if " it finds favorable conditions after facing that shear zone. Whats your 2 cents?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests