ATL: PHILIPPE - Remnants - Discussion
Moderator: S2k Moderators
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
The TWO was worded the way it was because the front is moving quickly into the GOM (already clearly visible west of 85W) and will move the Caribbean weather eastward with it...
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/gulfvs.html
http://www.goes.noaa.gov/HURRLOOPS/gulfvs.html
0 likes
- wxman57
- Moderator-Pro Met
- Posts: 22505
- Age: 66
- Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
- Location: Houston, TX (southwest)
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
joey wrote:gatorcane wrote:interesting how South Florida / Keys are not mentioned as getting watches but the NW Bahamas and Western Cuba are? Guess NHC is pretty confident it goes far enough SE of Florida to not be an issue.
dont want to cause a alarm they will wait for recon data then decide but something should be up at 5pm for some one
No, the reason the NHC forecasters aren't mentioning the Keys or South Florida is because the low will likely track far enough east of south Florida so as to have little impact there.
2 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
Plenty of tropical force winds found south of the broad COC.
91830 1634N 08455W 9596 00421 0079 +216 +216 263034 035 049 029 00
191900 1632N 08454W 9593 00430 0083 +214 +214 261035 037 046 024 00
191930 1631N 08452W 9593 00430 0083 +213 +213 266034 036 036 015 00
192000 1630N 08451W 9594 00428 0081 +213 +213 266038 040 038 009 00
192030 1629N 08450W 9594 00427 0082 +206 //// 265040 041 038 006 01
192100 1628N 08449W 9593 00430 0083 +212 //// 261039 040 034 008 01
192130 1626N 08447W 9597 00427 0084 +211 //// 258039 040 033 006 01
$$
91830 1634N 08455W 9596 00421 0079 +216 +216 263034 035 049 029 00
191900 1632N 08454W 9593 00430 0083 +214 +214 261035 037 046 024 00
191930 1631N 08452W 9593 00430 0083 +213 +213 266034 036 036 015 00
192000 1630N 08451W 9594 00428 0081 +213 +213 266038 040 038 009 00
192030 1629N 08450W 9594 00427 0082 +206 //// 265040 041 038 006 01
192100 1628N 08449W 9593 00430 0083 +212 //// 261039 040 034 008 01
192130 1626N 08447W 9597 00427 0084 +211 //// 258039 040 033 006 01
$$
0 likes
- SFLcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9626
- Age: 46
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Lake Worth Florida
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
The Keys and SFL are indeed mentioned in the 2pm TWO not sure what you guys are talking about.
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
So the fat lady sings another song for So Fla after much ado about little or nothing?
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 7300
- Age: 38
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2017 1:51 am
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
Likely closed and with tropical storm forced winds...Expect upgrade at 5pm.
0 likes
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23499
- Age: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
Looks like spiral "banding" is starting to take shape on the east side looking at the vis floater loop, looks to be moving WNW:
Last edited by gatorcane on Fri Oct 27, 2017 2:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
0 likes
- AdamFirst
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2488
- Age: 35
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 10:54 am
- Location: Port Saint Lucie, FL
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
We are we dismissing any impact for South Florida? Even the NHC says the Keys & South Florida should keep watch. It never was gonna be more than a rain event anyway, it just may be a bit windier than expected.
0 likes
Dolphins Marlins Canes Golden Panthers HEAT
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022
Andrew 1992 - Irene 1999 - Frances 2004 - Jeanne 2004 - Wilma 2005 - Fay 2008 - Isaac 2012 - Matthew 2016 - Irma 2017 - Dorian 2019 - Ian 2022 - Nicole 2022
- SFLcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 9626
- Age: 46
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 1:44 pm
- Location: Lake Worth Florida
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
This should’ve be at minimal a TD enough westerly winds found on recon but could go straight to a TS
0 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 3950
- Age: 27
- Joined: Mon Aug 17, 2015 4:16 pm
- Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Florida
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
sunnyday wrote:So the fat lady sings another song for So Fla after much ado about little or nothing?
Umm no.
NHC is mentioning this now on their TWO.
0 likes
The posts in this forum are NOT official forecasts and should not be used as such. They are just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or STORM2K. For official information, please refer to products from the NHC and NWS.
Model Runs Cheat Sheet:
GFS (5:30 AM/PM, 11:30 AM/PM)
HWRF, GFDL, UKMET, NAVGEM (6:30-8:00 AM/PM, 12:30-2:00 AM/PM)
ECMWF (1:45 AM/PM)
TCVN is a weighted averaged
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23499
- Age: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
93L position and track are very reminiscent of Wilma in 2005 which tracked through this area and turned NE ahead of a strong cold front int South Florida just a few days prior in October
The big difference of course is that this system is nowhere near the strength of Wilma in its current position.
What I am wondering though is when this interacts with the cold front over or near South FL / Keys, could the system be baroclinically enhanced similar to Wilma but on a less severe scale or will the shear be able to rip it apart sufficiently north of Cuba?
The big difference of course is that this system is nowhere near the strength of Wilma in its current position.
What I am wondering though is when this interacts with the cold front over or near South FL / Keys, could the system be baroclinically enhanced similar to Wilma but on a less severe scale or will the shear be able to rip it apart sufficiently north of Cuba?
0 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
Looks like we got something.
0 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
- gatorcane
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 23499
- Age: 46
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
- Location: Boca Raton, FL
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
wide shot visible animation, looks like a storm to me and it is on the move too.
Yesterday at this time it didn't look like much, amazing what the NW Caribbean waters can do to these things.
Yesterday at this time it didn't look like much, amazing what the NW Caribbean waters can do to these things.
2 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
IMO I think they are going to go ahead with posting tropical storm warnings because of all of the tropical storm force winds found south and east of the broad center of circulation.
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 4806
- Age: 40
- Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2003 2:54 pm
- Location: South Florida
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
NHC will initiate advisories at 5 PM EDT on Potential Tropcial Cyclone Eighteen, currently located over the Northwestern Caribbean Sea.
Source: http://nhc.noaa.gov
Source: http://nhc.noaa.gov
2 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
gatorcane wrote:93L position and track are very reminiscent of Wilma in 2005 which tracked through this area and turned NE ahead of a strong cold front int South Florida just a few days prior in October
The big difference of course is that this system is nowhere near the strength of Wilma in its current position.
What I am wondering though is when this interacts with the cold front over or near South FL / Keys, could the system be baroclinically enhanced similar to Wilma but on a less severe scale or will the shear be able to rip it apart sufficiently north of Cuba?
With all due respect, Wilma’s track was quite different.
She crossed the Yucatán Peninsula before getting pushed ENE towards Southwest Florida as a Cat 3.
This system won’t touch Yucatán and will cross Cuba south of the Florida Peninsula as a Tropical Storm at most
0 likes
Personal Forecast Disclaimer:
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!
My posts are just my opinion and are most likely not backed by sound meteorological data. They are NOT endorsed by any professional institution or storm2k.org. For official information, please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Bottom line is that I am just expressing my opinion!!!
-
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2005 7:49 pm
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
i am not a fan of these PTC. Either it is. Or it isn't. The public has no clue on what it means. It is only surpassed by slight, marginal, moderate, high risk. ....NWS just doesn't have a handle on how important it is to classify a threat risk in a way the public can easily understand...
5 likes
Re: ATL: Invest 93L - Discussion
fox13weather wrote:i am not a fan of these PTC. Either it is. Or it isn't. The public has no clue on what it means. It is only surpassed by slight, marginal, moderate, high risk. ....NWS just doesn't have a handle on how important it is to classify a threat risk in a way the public can easily understand...
I agree see no use for the PTC with the general public.
1 likes
The following post is NOT an official forecast and should not be used as such. It is just the opinion of the poster and may or may not be backed by sound meteorological data. It is NOT endorsed by any professional institution including storm2k.org For Official Information please refer to the NHC and NWS products.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests