


Moderator: S2k Moderators
Alyono wrote:Chris_in_Tampa wrote:Alyono wrote:I've seen no evidence at all that shows 55 kt winds
I guess they thought this was representative:
https://i.imgur.com/UEwcmrx.jpg
that SFMR was clearly invalid. It spiked from 35 kt the previous ob to 55 kt. Winds quickly decreased.
I suspect Berg went with the 700mb flight level to surface ratio using 90%. That despite SFMR showing that is clearly invalid in this case. It's running closer to 70%
GCANE wrote:
gatorcane wrote:I find it hard to believe all the models including the reliable GFS and ECMWF will have greatly underestimated the eventual strength at landfall. Even the CMC is only 998MB and usually it is too intense. They clearly are seeing something that would prevent RI.
NDG wrote:Hot off the press.
NDG wrote:Hot off the press.
Alyono wrote:for the first time, I am now seeing evidence of 55 kt surface winds
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests