
ATL: HARVEY - Models
Moderator: S2k Moderators
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16012
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16012
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
South Texas Storms wrote:Almost the exact same position as the 12z run for the GFS. It is weaker this run though.
Yeah, just east.
0 likes
RIP Kobe Bryant
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Gfs shows favorable conditons from hour 48 to hour 72. Key is what shape can it get to before then. Lets say this a tropical storm before then... then it can landfall much stronger. Key take away is slow formation through 48 hours... then quick ramp up.
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
1 likes
-
- Category 5
- Posts: 1753
- Age: 25
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:14 am
- Location: Jupiter, FL
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
Similar to my thoughts. A well defined vortex is likely by tomorrow.
1 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
So that could make a huge difference in how strong the GFS makes it?
0 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16012
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
TheStormExpert wrote:Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
So that could make a huge difference in how strong the GFS makes it?
yeah. Could be by as much a 40 mb
0 likes
-
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 2776
- Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2003 10:52 am
- Location: Biloxi Beach, Ms
- Contact:
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
[quote="Kingarabian"]18z GFS through hour 84:
and pressure still falling over land albeit not much...
and pressure still falling over land albeit not much...

0 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16012
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
I think the GFS has been developing the same vortex for the past couple of runs now. Just that the previous were more north and in turn the system had more time over very warm waters and that's why we would see a Cat.3 - Cat.4 landfall.
0 likes
RIP Kobe Bryant
-
- Category 1
- Posts: 279
- Age: 34
- Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2017 6:53 pm
- Location: Corpus christi
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:TheStormExpert wrote:Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
So that could make a huge difference in how strong the GFS makes it?
yeah. Could be by as much a 40 mb
Exactly and that's what draws it further north is the broad spin if you watch it and thanks for pointing that out
0 likes
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
I think the GFS has been developing the same vortex for the past couple of runs now. Just that the previous were more north and in turn the system had more time over very warm waters and that's why we would see a Cat.3 - Cat.4 landfall.
it's too broad. If it were tighter, it would intensify quicker given that upper environment
0 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16012
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16012
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Alyono wrote:Kingarabian wrote:Alyono wrote:GFS appears to have the wrong initial vortex. I am seeing the ONLY reason this run is weaker is the vortex is too broad. Simply takes a little too long to spin up
I think the GFS has been developing the same vortex for the past couple of runs now. Just that the previous were more north and in turn the system had more time over very warm waters and that's why we would see a Cat.3 - Cat.4 landfall.
it's too broad. If it were tighter, it would intensify quicker given that upper environment
On satellite the vort we're tracking seems considerably smaller. The models including the Euro for some reason think the whole system is one large circulation.
1 likes
RIP Kobe Bryant
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
Keep this thread on topic and avoid back and forths with other users.
2 likes
- Kingarabian
- S2K Supporter
- Posts: 16012
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 3:06 am
- Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
18z GFS through hour 120. Now just looping and meandering:

Bad flooding event.

Bad flooding event.
2 likes
RIP Kobe Bryant
- South Texas Storms
- Professional-Met
- Posts: 4231
- Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 12:28 am
- Location: Houston, TX
Re: ATL: HARVEY - Models
18z GFS looks more similar to the 12z Euro Ensemble with it tracking back south across TX after stalling in central TX.
2 likes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests