latitude_20 wrote:Steve wrote:It's probably fruitless to ask since I've been at this online since the mid 90s. It's been a long, long time since there was a threat of a major with a wide spread in possible landfalls. That inevitably leads to -removed- and model wars. Please consider that model x isn't better than model y because it's closer to you. There are long time posters that I'm not going to name who almost never miss the opportunity to wishcast based on the models that show a storm coming to them. Many of them would argue for the Clipper model if it showed it going near to them. Models hitting anything over 10 days out are rare. The GFS being one of them is rarer. Please consider that probably at least a few hundred people or more will read your post. For instance, if you are in Louisiana, try to consider why the North Carolina or Florida model may be right. Hundreds of people thank you in advance.
One of the best posts I've seen in this thread. Thank you.
Very wise words from Steve! Something I learned long ago when I first joined this site is to avoid letting how one “feels” decide how you interpret the model data. Instead, using things such as climo, the pattern tendencies, analogs, models, and what makes the most sense to determine where it could go.