ATL: TEN - Post-Tropical - Discussion

Moderator: S2k Moderators

Message
Author
TheStormExpert

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#181 Postby TheStormExpert » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:45 am

gatorcane wrote:looks like some convection is on the increase. This would likely become Irma instead of Harvey. I just don't like the sound of that name..."Irma" :eek:

Image

Neither do I, Irma sounds way more threatening than Irene did. In fact it's probably the most threatening name on this years list of names.
0 likes   

RL3AO
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 16308
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:03 pm
Location: NC

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#182 Postby RL3AO » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:47 am

Conditions don't look unfavorable in the Bahamas when it gets there, but the models don't develop it. On the other hand, the conditions were favorable with Gert too and the models didn't develop it. Watch this one very closely.
1 likes   

User avatar
gatorcane
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 23689
Age: 47
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:54 pm
Location: Boca Raton, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#183 Postby gatorcane » Thu Aug 17, 2017 9:55 am

Another view of the convection blowup - deepest convection we have seen so far:

Image
0 likes   

tgenius
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1159
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 5:31 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#184 Postby tgenius » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:00 am

While it is still way too early I think this one might be the one to worry about for CONUS.. i'm watching it like a hawk; Andrew's 25th anniversary is a week away too!
1 likes   

OuterBanker
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 1728
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 10:53 am
Location: Nags Head, NC
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#185 Postby OuterBanker » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:12 am

gatorcane wrote:The TUTT in the Eastern Bahamas is definitely moving west. The upper-low north of 92L with the shear the models think could severely disruption 92l is slowly moving SSW. Doesn't seem to be making that much progress:

Image


What an excellent example of a TUTT and great instructional moment.
You can see how the Haiti/DR shredding machine doesn’t even phase a TUTT. While it would shred apart a tropical system. Mets, correct me if I’m wrong.
0 likes   

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#186 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:12 am

If you read the discussion on potential tropical cyclone 9 you can see that the NHC isn't putting much faith into the Euro or GFS as far as intensity goes...I would assume we can draw the same conclusions with 92L as well.
0 likes   

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#187 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:15 am

Should have chances go up again at 2 pm and see advisories by tomorrow morning.
2 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#188 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:16 am

Bocadude85 wrote:If you read the discussion on potential tropical cyclone 9 you can see that the NHC isn't putting much faith into the Euro or GFS as far as intensity goes...I would assume we can draw the same conclusions with 92L as well.


From the 11:00AM discussion on PTC 9 in regards to NHC's thinking of the model output currently:

The system is in an area of moderate easterly vertical shear, and
the large-scale models suggest that light/moderate shear should
continue through the forecast period. This seems favorable for
strengthening, and the SHIPS and LGEM models show slow, but steady,
intensification. However, the GFS and ECMWF models forecast the
system to degenerate to an easterly wave over the central Caribbean
Sea, possibly due to dry air entrainment. The intensity forecast
follows the trend of the SHIPS/LGEM models, but it respects the
GFS/ECMWF forecasts by being on the low side of the intensity
guidance envelope.
1 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

sma10
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 1710
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 1:13 pm

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#189 Postby sma10 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:17 am

gatorcane wrote:The TUTT in the Eastern Bahamas is definitely moving west. The upper-low north of 92L with the shear the models think could severely disruption 92l is slowly moving SSW. Doesn't seem to be making that much progress:

Image


Really impressed also with the large blowup of showers that the TUTT is causing in its interaction with a wave. If it holds together, it's going to bring quite a rainy day to the peninsula on Saturday.
0 likes   

User avatar
Blown Away
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 10140
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 6:17 am

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#190 Postby Blown Away » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:18 am

Aric Dunn wrote:Should have chances go up again at 2 pm and see advisories by tomorrow morning.


Lofty goal... :D

91L has no support from GFS and some Euro support near CA, but not in next 72 hours, but NHC still started advisories...
0 likes   
Hurricane Eye Experience: David 79, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05... EYE COMING MY WAY IN 2024…
Hurricane Brush Experience: Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22…

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#191 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:22 am

SouthFLTropics wrote:
Bocadude85 wrote:If you read the discussion on potential tropical cyclone 9 you can see that the NHC isn't putting much faith into the Euro or GFS as far as intensity goes...I would assume we can draw the same conclusions with 92L as well.


From the 11:00AM discussion on PTC 9 in regards to NHC's thinking of the model output currently:

The system is in an area of moderate easterly vertical shear, and
the large-scale models suggest that light/moderate shear should
continue through the forecast period. This seems favorable for
strengthening, and the SHIPS and LGEM models show slow, but steady,
intensification. However, the GFS and ECMWF models forecast the
system to degenerate to an easterly wave over the central Caribbean
Sea, possibly due to dry air entrainment. The intensity forecast
follows the trend of the SHIPS/LGEM models, but it respects the
GFS/ECMWF forecasts by being on the low side of the intensity
guidance envelope.


12Z SHIPS and LGEM have 92L as a strengthening TS at 120 hours.
0 likes   

User avatar
northjaxpro
S2K Supporter
S2K Supporter
Posts: 8900
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 11:21 am
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#192 Postby northjaxpro » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:26 am

Hurricaneman wrote:I wouldn't be surprised to see recon go out to this one by tomorrow if it continues to organize


Yes, I agree.
0 likes   
NEVER, EVER SAY NEVER in the tropics and weather in general, and most importantly, with life itself!!

________________________________________________________________________________________

Fay 2008 Beryl 2012 Debby 2012 Colin 2016 Hermine 2016 Julia 2016 Matthew 2016 Irma 2017 Dorian 2019

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#193 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:27 am

Blown Away wrote:
Aric Dunn wrote:Should have chances go up again at 2 pm and see advisories by tomorrow morning.


Lofty goal... :D

91L has no support from GFS and some Euro support near CA, but not in next 72 hours, but NHC still started advisories...


That is always the problem with models. they are only as good as the quality of the data that is inputed. I have been extremely perplexed with the amount of forecasting made in the short term range from the NHC and many others instead of actually following the trends. Gert is a perfect example. no support from models and they just kept putting it off putting it off when it was clearly classifiable at least 2 days before the forst advisory.

for TC genesis ot is always prudent to do a series of short term analysis and forecast than to strictly look at a model and say "well models do not develop it at all ever so no need to pay attention" or the "next please" mentality will lead to failure.
1 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#194 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:27 am

One problem may be PTC Nine (Harvey-to-be). If we get a strong TS or hurricane passing north of Honduras next Monday while this disturbance is in the Florida Straits, then it will be encountering lots of westerly shear from Harvey's outflow.
4 likes   

User avatar
p1nheadlarry
Category 2
Category 2
Posts: 672
Age: 33
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 2:42 pm
Location: SR County FL

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#195 Postby p1nheadlarry » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:29 am

OuterBanker wrote:
gatorcane wrote:The TUTT in the Eastern Bahamas is definitely moving west. The upper-low north of 92L with the shear the models think could severely disruption 92l is slowly moving SSW. Doesn't seem to be making that much progress:

https://s12.postimg.org/7vg5d2b3h/wv-animated.gif


What an excellent example of a TUTT and great instructional moment.
You can see how the Haiti/DR shredding machine doesn’t even phase a TUTT. While it would shred apart a tropical system. Mets, correct me if I’m wrong.


I'm not a met but they are in the 200mb level, that's up there.
1 likes   
--;->#GoNoles--;->.

Aric Dunn
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 21238
Age: 42
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 9:58 pm
Location: Ready for the Chase.
Contact:

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#196 Postby Aric Dunn » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:41 am

convection has persisted since yesterday and there are clear signs of a closed circ ( quite prevalent actually ). this by definition is classifiable.
0 likes   
Note: If I make a post that is brief. Please refer back to previous posts for the analysis or reasoning. I do not re-write/qoute what my initial post said each time.
If there is nothing before... then just ask :)

Space & Atmospheric Physicist, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University,
I believe the sky is falling...

User avatar
Bocadude85
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 2991
Age: 38
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Honolulu,Hi

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#197 Postby Bocadude85 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:45 am

wxman57 wrote:One problem may be PTC Nine (Harvey-to-be). If we get a strong TS or hurricane passing north of Honduras next Monday while this disturbance is in the Florida Straits, then it will be encountering lots of westerly shear from Harvey's outflow.


What if Harvey is not as strong as expected or moves inland into Honduras? Do you see a tropical storm threat to S.Fla?
Last edited by Bocadude85 on Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
0 likes   

User avatar
SouthFLTropics
Category 5
Category 5
Posts: 4236
Age: 49
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 8:04 am
Location: Port St. Lucie, Florida

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#198 Postby SouthFLTropics » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:45 am

Aric Dunn wrote:convection has persisted since yesterday and there are clear signs of a closed circ ( quite prevalent actually ). this by definition is classifiable.


By the strictest definition yes...it is classifiable. I think they only pulled the trigger on PTC 9 since it will be the first to affect land masses and population centers. 92L currently poses no threat so they feel there is no need to classify as of yet. Just my 2 cents.
1 likes   
Fourth Generation Florida Native

Personal Storm History: David 79, Andrew 92, Erin 95, Floyd 99, Irene 99, Frances 04, Jeanne 04, Wilma 05, Matthew 16, Irma 17, Ian 22, Nicole 22, Milton 24

User avatar
wxman57
Moderator-Pro Met
Moderator-Pro Met
Posts: 22951
Age: 67
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:06 pm
Location: Houston, TX (southwest)

Re: ATL: INVEST 92L - Discussion

#199 Postby wxman57 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:51 am

Bocadude85 wrote:
wxman57 wrote:One problem may be PTC Nine (Harvey-to-be). If we get a strong TS or hurricane passing north of Honduras next Monday while this disturbance is in the Florida Straits, then it will be encountering lots of westerly shear from Harvey's outflow.


What if Harvey is not as strong as expected or moves inland into Honduras? Do you see a tropical storm threat to S.Fla?


That's possible. Most models and ensemble members indicate dissipation east of Florida. Regardless, I don't think this will be a very large storm. More likely a rainfall threat.
0 likes   

CrazyC83
Professional-Met
Professional-Met
Posts: 34001
Joined: Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:57 pm
Location: Deep South, for the first time!

Re: ATL: INVEST 91L - Recon

#200 Postby CrazyC83 » Thu Aug 17, 2017 11:04 am

000
URNT15 KNHC 171557
AF303 0109A INVEST HDOB 04 20170817
154700 1728N 06330W 4095 07450 0433 -136 -206 123016 018 /// /// 03
154730 1728N 06328W 4095 07447 0430 -139 -212 117018 018 /// /// 03
154800 1728N 06326W 4098 07440 0428 -136 -220 118018 018 /// /// 03
154830 1727N 06324W 4098 07439 0427 -140 -272 119018 018 /// /// 03
154900 1727N 06321W 4098 07440 0427 -135 -289 117017 018 /// /// 03
154930 1726N 06319W 4098 07441 0427 -135 -298 118016 017 /// /// 03
155000 1726N 06317W 4100 07439 0429 -135 -303 114019 021 /// /// 03
155030 1725N 06314W 4094 07447 0427 -137 -305 113020 020 /// /// 03
155100 1725N 06312W 4102 07433 0428 -135 -309 115018 019 /// /// 03
155130 1724N 06309W 4098 07441 0428 -135 -311 114018 018 /// /// 03
155200 1724N 06307W 4099 07438 0428 -137 -310 111019 021 /// /// 03
155230 1723N 06305W 4100 07438 0428 -136 -303 109019 020 /// /// 03
155300 1723N 06302W 4098 07442 0430 -139 -309 110020 021 /// /// 03
155330 1722N 06300W 4099 07438 0428 -136 -341 112022 022 /// /// 03
155400 1722N 06257W 4098 07439 0427 -135 -340 113023 023 /// /// 03
155430 1721N 06255W 4098 07440 0428 -138 -341 114022 023 /// /// 03
155500 1721N 06252W 4101 07435 0428 -137 -356 113022 023 /// /// 03
155530 1720N 06250W 4097 07442 0428 -140 -372 115022 023 /// /// 03
155600 1720N 06247W 4099 07438 0427 -140 -369 115023 023 /// /// 03
155630 1719N 06244W 4099 07438 0427 -135 -368 115023 023 /// /// 03
$$
;
0 likes   


Return to “2017”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests